Pitbull with Lipstick?

Sarah Palin made her big splash to a receptive crowd last night at the Republican National Convention. We’ll see how well it plays with those not already so predisposed.

One thing is for sure:

Sarah Palin made her big splash to a receptive crowd last night at the Republican National Convention. We’ll see how well it plays with those not already so predisposed.

One thing is for sure:

By
• Topics:
Sarah Palin made her big splash to a receptive crowd last night at the Republican National Convention. We'll see how well it plays with those not already so predisposed.

One thing is for sure: McCain's choice was clearly more deliberate than pundits originally imagined.

She started her political career at her local PTA, served as a city council member, a small town mayor and then governor of her state. That is, indeed, relevant experience that will resonate with small town America - even if it doesn't impress beltway lifers.

She has a big family that has its problems. Deal with it, she is.

She's a hockey mom. She joked that the difference between a pit bull and a hockey mom was the lipstick. Then, with a charming smile, she demonstrated that she didn't have to bark before biting.

Before she was done, we learned that Obama is an irresponsible, inexperienced, prevaricating community organizer and the Republican party is the champion of farm and factory workers and small business like, presumably, oil companies.

According to Palin, Obama will tax the bujeezuz out of everyone, bloat government with new, expensive programs, gut our national defense, pussyfoot around with our enemies and sit on his hands when it comes to keeping energy flowing to American (US) interests.

Palin's team meanwhile promises to commence drilling our wilderness and coastlines for oil and gas, start up more coal-fired and nuclear generation, creating more energy and jobs for Americans. They will reduce taxes, reduce spending and shrink government, maybe even distributing surpluses to the people like she did in Alaska. They are the true reformers, promoting not just change, but "change Americans can understand". Somehow, they will also bolster our defense and win our wars.

She slapped Obama silly and proudly plucked the suspenders of both McCain and herself. And it will be very difficult for Obama to strike back.

The timing was a matter of Rovian perfection. As soon as it was revealed that Palin's unwed daughter is pregnant, whole delegations of Republican women came striding forward to defend her against a host of "sexist" pundit detractors, "elite" media vultures and professional politicians. With this defensive phalanx firmly in place, she immediately went on the offensive.

McCain now has the luxury of sticking to issues and falling back on his superior experience and military heroism. He can attack Obama's platform, stealing what he likes, and seize the intellectual high road.

Palin, protected by a well-conceived shroud of symbolic chivalry, is free to snipe away at Obama's integrity without fear of reprisal. Obama will need to deal with a constant barrage of distractions as Republicans take a page from the American Revolution - firing at Democratic ranks from the forest cover.

Nothing really changed in what Republicans - or Democrats - represent. It's the rules of engagement that were warped in McCain's favor. Obama will need to tread lightly.

There's a pit bull on the loose, and it's wearing lipstick.

About Tip Johnson

Citizen Journalist and Editor • Member since Jan 11, 2008

Tip Johnson is a longtime citizen interest advocate with a record of public achievement projects for good government and the environment. A lifelong student of government, Tip served two terms [...]

Comments by Readers

Doug Karlberg

Sep 04, 2008

Tip,

Nice piece. I have to disagree and correct your statement as to Palin’s support of Big Oil.

She has been a pitbull with big oil, while most of Alaska politicians in Alaska were bought off, she took them on.

Currently Exxon and Conoco want a gas pipeline on their terms, which have never been very advantageous, as Alaska’s elected officials were bought off.

Palin told them no way. Alaska will control the pipeline process and we are going to be bringing in pipeline operator, Trans-Canada. This really pissed off Exxon. The nerve.

Exxon is quietly refusing to put gas in the pipeline.

One of Exxon’s major gas fields has been untapped and Exxon by contract, was required to drill as a term of the lease. Exxon refused to drill.

Palin sued Exxon and is now taking the lease away from Exxon.

I can’t think of a single politician that Exxon fears more, than a pitbull with lipstick.

There is a lot that we don’t know about her, which is why I needed to correct this record.

No offence meant.

~

Read More...

Tip Johnson

Sep 04, 2008

None taken!

Just seems that the position on drilling is big oil.

But I agree.  Lots to learn.

Read More...

Doug Karlberg

Sep 04, 2008

If Alaska cannot access their natural resources, the state would dry up and blow away.

You can’t blame them for wanting to drill for oil.

If our state only had oil, we might want to drill it too, especially when you have to provide for schools and such, from somewhere.
~

Read More...

Scott Wicklund

Sep 04, 2008

If Alaska has all the oil, and gives the residents a healthy share of the profits each year, why did Sarah Palin hire an associate of Jack Abramoff to bring 9k population Wasilla 27 million in earmarks from us that could have been better used in States that need it?

Horsesass.org - for John Stewart comments

This is pretty funny and thought provoking!  Now if John Stewart would be on the ticket the debate would be elevated….

Read More...

Scott Wicklund

Sep 05, 2008

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/The_antiPalin_email.html

This Wasilla resident has some very good insights into McCain’s VP wannabee….
A read of the whole email shows a much different person than Craig Mayberry talked up.

Read More...

Scott Wicklund

Sep 05, 2008

http://www.politicalbase.com/profile/Mark%20Nickolas/blog/&blogId=3591

This worth checking out.  McCain’s campaign says Sarah Palin will not answer questions from the press during the campaign!  What a piece of work….

Read More...

Doug Karlberg

Sep 05, 2008

Scott,

Who could possibly argue with horsesass.com.

I won’t, which means that there may be nobody left to argue with.

~

Read More...

Tip Johnson

Sep 05, 2008

Doug,

Listening to McCain’s speech, I got the distinct impression that the Republican position on new offshore drilling extends well beyond the state of Alaska’s natural resource base.

How do fishers feel about that?

Read More...

Craig Mayberry

Sep 05, 2008

Many years ago a young women in England married a prince.  She was a commoner (not of royal blood) and suddenly appeared on the scene.  The press was always brutal, watching her every move and providing a fair amount of criticism.  She quickly grew to be one of the most popular of any of the royal family, drawing even more ire from the “old-boy royal blood network”.  The more the press vilified her, the more popular she became.  You can make many arguments as to why, Diana certainly made her fair share of mistakes, but in the end the people loved her because she was truly one of them and the British royal elite hated her because she was not one of them.  Despite the treatment by the press, and ultimately the royal family, she always acted with dignity and grace.

We have yet to see if Sarah will handle the elite fury with the same class and dignity that Princess Diana handled the British elite, but based on what I have sen, I think we can start printing the figurative “Princess Sarah” signs. 

Obama wants us to believe he is one of us, but there is that whole Harvard Law Degree and all those celebrities that follow him around, drolling with every word.  Gov. Palin is one of us.  I seriously doubt much is going to change in Washington no matter who gets elected, but frankly, I would rather have a “commoner” try than someone from the political and educational elite. 

It will be an interesting few weeks, but I have a feeling that by early November we will not be talking about whether Obama will win the election, but whether Obama will even win a state.

Read More...

Scott Wicklund

Sep 05, 2008

http://www.blueoregon.com/2008/09/on-sarah-palin.html

A good discussion of Pallin and family values…

Read More...
To comment, Log In or Register