Who is the commander-in-chief when the president’s brain is addled by steroids?

 Randy,

The unfortunate reality is that the president, in his role as commander in chief, remains there until he relinquishes his duties under the 25th amendment or if he is declared mentally or physically incompentent under the 25th amendment.  Not very tidy but them’s the rules.

I agree, Dick. What stirs my anger is when I see him try to pull off crisp salutes as he gets on and off aircraft. His dangling thumb spoils his effort to appear “soldier-like,” and nothing can wipe away the bone-spur stain that kept him outta Vietnam, where you and I first met.

Doug,

Yes, my friend, you and I can get out of the military but we can’t get the military out of ourselves.  It is there, pinned forever,  as are our reactions to it.  This president is a pitiful human being who lives in constant fear of failure and humiliation.   The irony is that his actions bring on both.  Under the present conditions, to call him commander in chief is, essentially, to mock him. 

Education about the reality of the military should begin as early as possible:

https://nnomy.org/en/

National Organization Opposing the Militarization of Youth.

The spin begins early in our culture… I was a Conscientious Objector when Nixon “called me up” and in many long, sincere conversations with my dear friend who did suffer the consequences of his so-called service I always come back to my early access to better information/education.

By age 18 I knew The American War (as the Vietnamese called it) was based on sociopathic B.S. but my good friend did not. As a member of the working class he did not have available to him all the tricks that the Trumps and Cheneys of the elite used to avoid conscription into the maw of the military.

Christopher,

Thanks for your thoughtful comment. 

In the late 70s as a US Army major, I wrote a letter to Time Magazine supporting then President Carter’s executive order that  pardoned “draft dodgers”.  I learned shortly that the commanding general’s wife was furious and demanded that her husband court martial me.  For what offense, I still don’t know (conduct unbecoming an officer?) but I learned that the Army was probably not going to be my lifetime career.  I had orders in hand reassigning me to NATO headquarters in Mons, Belgium, considered a plum assignement, but I chose instead to resign.

This was the culmination of years of growing disenchantment mostly fueled by incompenent commanders to whom subordinates had to toady up lest a bad efficiency report tank a career.  There was also the lingering thoughts of the futility of the war in Viet Nam that hung over the military like the cloud over Joe Btfsplk.

So, in a way, I  understand your decision as a CO.  I was nowhere near that in the mid-60s as I graduated college with a much sought after Regular Army commission.  The Army was exciting, interesting, eye opening and finally disappointing as the years went by.  I know  you already read about my further thoughts in my article entitled DEROS + 50 years.

I can be supportive of organization such as NNOMY. Youth needs to be presented a balance picture of the realities of military service. 

We need good soldiers as we also need good police officers. How wonderful if we needed neither. But that is not the reality. 

Dick,

I’ve enjoyed reading of your personal Army experience… I do agree we need good soldiers but do we need a regular and gigantic standing army and all the rest of the vast bureaucracy and bloat that grows out of control? The authors of the Constitution were deeply fearful of a standing army, hence the 2nd amendment, wherein a well-trained militia might be called up in defense…. that is “defense” of the country. Maybe we need a system more like the Israelis…https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_Israel

It’s always useful to re-read the famous Smedley Butler speech (below). I don’t think a lot has changed, our military is joined at the hip to our corporatocracy.

“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer; a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902–1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.”

 Christopher,

Of course we do not need this boated Jabba-the-Hutt we call our armed forces. 

However, I will disagree about the origin of the 2nd Amendment.  It was actually a sop to the southern states to get them to sign on to the Constitution by allowing them to have slave patrols (militia) in the event of slave rebellions.  Read Thom Hartmann’s take on the 2nd Amendment entitled “The Second Amendment was ratified to preserve slavery”

 Dick,

I’ve listened to, read and respect Thom Hartman but this was news to me! So much of the wheeling and dealing around the Constitution seems to have been around slavery. Thanks for the clarification….

BTW, what happens if Jabba-the-Hutt keeps growing larger, does he explode like the diner in the famous Monte Python episode? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aczPDGC3f8U

 Christopher,

No, I understand he morphs into Pizza-the-Hutt.