About Guest Writer

Since 2007, this moniker has been used over 150 times on articles written by guest writers who may write once or very occasionally for Northwest Citizen, but not regularly. Some guest writers later became regular writers and we changed the author of their articles from guest to their actual names. For info, click on the 'About' menu tab and see 'Guest Writer Articles.'

By: Guest Writer (148)

The Long History of Corporate Fraud and Abuse in Medicare


[The following is reprinted from The Retiree Advocate, monthly newsletter of Puget Sound Advocates for Retirement Action (PSARA).  Guest Writer is Ana M. Malinow, MD, a member of PSARA. She is a retired pediatrician, a past president of Physicians for a National Health Program, and a lead organizer for National Single Payer www.nationalsinglepayer.com]

The passage of Medicare in 1965 was historic for covering the medical needs of seniors. But it also created conditions highly attractive for the providers of health care, who the government desperately wanted to accommodate. This arrangement resulted in the federal government surrendering the terms of the program and its costs to private health insurance companies, hospitals, and doctors, who would shape Medicare to maximize their profits at the expense of taxpayers from 1965 until today. A program originally designed to protect seniors from financial ruin due to medical costs, financed by the government and delivered through private doctors and hospitals, Medicare became a trough for corporations free to gorge themselves through sanctioned fraud and abuse. 

In the five decades since the passage of Medicare, the federal government has continued to accommodate health insurance companies, hospitals, and doctors. From the get-go, Medicare agreed to pay hospitals according to their costs instead of a negotiated rate. Doctors were paid according to “usual, customary, and reasonable” charges, which contributed to unchecked costs. Unrestrained accommodation to hospitals and doctors skyrocketed costs and resulted in many of the financial “reforms” that started a decade after the passage of Medicare, and which have persisted to this day.

The following three decades saw a series of attempts to control costs of Medicare. The 70s saw the rise of Health Maintenance Organizations, responsible for introducing for-profit corporations into the US health care system, which until then, had been dominated by the “non-profit” Blues. The 80s gave us diagnosis-related group hospital reimbursement, which incentivized hospitals to shorten hospital stays to increase profits. The 90s introduced Medicare Plus Choice, which resulted in the creation of mostly for-profit middlemen to manage the care of beneficiaries on Medicare. 

In 2003, with the passage of the Medicare Modernization Act, the floodgates to private insurance plans, now called Medicare Advantage (MA), were flung open. Enrollment in these plans grew steadily and aggressively, from about 5 million beneficiaries in 2003, to 28 million beneficiaries today, or half of all beneficiaries. Reasons for its popularity are obvious: no or low premium for Part B (outpatient costs) and Part D (prescription drug plans) and extra benefits prohibited in Traditional Medicare (TM) – the non-MA part of Medicare – such as some vision, hearing, dental, fitness, telehealth, over-the-counter items, meals, gym memberships, and transportation benefits. 

But the real reason why these plans are so popular has less to do with enrollee benefits and more to do with industry benefits – all fraudulent, all legal. Medicare sets rates for MA enrollees above those for TM – meaning Medicare pays MA plans more for enrollees than for enrollees in TM. There are bogus quality bonuses and rebates, again all fraudulent, all legal. MA plans game risk scores (making healthy patients look sicker, increasing the payment rate, but not increasing the amount of health care provided), engage in favorable selection (selecting for the healthiest patients and dropping the sickest ones), create narrow networks that often exclude cancer centers of excellence, and impose prior authorization delays and outright denials of care for millions of beneficiaries despite meeting Medicare coverage rules. A recent New York Times article revealed that 8 out of 10 of the largest MA plans submitted inflated bills to Medicare. Overpayments to MA plans from 2010 to 2019 totaled $106 billion – fraud the government has little appetite to recoup. 

This waste and fraud threaten to deplete the Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund by 2028. In the same New York Times article, journalists Abelson and Sanger-Katz write, "additional [upcoding] diagnoses led to $12 billion in overpayments in 2020 – enough to cover hearing and vision care for every American over 65." For the industry, it’s a sweet deal, made sweeter by incessant and often misleading ads during the annual Open Enrollment period, many featuring former NFL or aging Hollywood stars. 

The industry, not content with just half of the Medicare pie, has already gobbled up more. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), tasked with the responsible stewardship of Medicare, has been secretly privatizing TM through schemes such as the Medicare Shared Savings Program, Accountable Care Organizations, and most recently, through ACO REACH. Some ACO REACH participants have a history of Medicare fraud, but Medicare continues to sign contracts with them.

These schemes are developed by the Innovation Center, whose mandate is to develop payment models that lower costs while not worsening care. Models, including ACO REACH, are given “safe harbor” from certain fraud and abuse laws, including the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which makes it unlawful for a person to refer government-paid patients for medical services in exchange for payment. It seems like Innovation models cannot lower costs or improve patient care without fraud and abuse.

The aim of the Innovation Center is to have 100 percent of TM beneficiaries in a “care relationship with accountability for quality and total cost of care by 2030.”

“Accountability for quality and cost of care” is how Medicare gets privatized – by inserting private equity, venture capitalists, and for-profit insurance plans into a public program. In 1965, Medicare was threatened by the financial interests of insurance companies, hospitals, and doctors. Today, we are faced with the final iteration of this threat, where corporations take over Medicare completely for their own profit, sanctioned by the government. And all by 2030.

About Guest Writer

Citizen Journalist • Member since Jun 15, 2008

Since 2007, this moniker has been used over 150 times on articles written by guest writers who may write once or very occasionally for Northwest Citizen, but not regularly. Some guest writers [...]

M. Lynda Hanscome

May 05, 2023

I agree with Dr. Malinow completely.  The PeaceHealth ACO-REACH scam stole my health file and enrolled me in the first iteration of this for-profit without my knowledge or consent.  It is all about MONEY.  I have TM and an excellent supplementary insurance (Tri-Care-for-Life).  But now PH is nothing more than and HMO that is that is defrauding Medicare out of millions of dollars and severely limiting patient care.

I have caught PH upcoding my occasional high blood pressure to put me in a higher risk group for more money from Medicare.  The Mayo Clinic calls HBP as “common condition.”  PH ignored that logic and have since put me in a category called “chronic disease.”  The “fix” that was presented in writing to me was that I agree to a one-on-one counselling session with a nurse practitioner.  Yes, really.  I agree with the writer of the article and that this corporate greed is the kiss of death to Traditional Medicare.

And PH is busy eliminating competition in the Bellingham area.  They are disgusting.  I have been fighting with PH for well over a year to be removed from the secret list of ‘participants.’  Maybe strength in numbers is a better option and it is pitiful that seniors who have given and given more to others and their communities in their lifetimes now have to scramble to fight a system that is corrput from the top down.  Very sad.  Thanks for your article, Dr. Malinow.


To comment, Log In or Register

The Long History of Corporate Fraud and Abuse in Medicare

By Guest WriterOn May 05, 2023

[The following is reprinted from The Retiree Advocate, monthly newsletter of Puget Sound Advocates for Retirement Action (PSARA). &...

1 comment, most recent 3 weeks ago


By Guest WriterOn Apr 03, 2023

Including others when developing solutions is a hallmark of leadership. It was not evident at the March 13th City Council meeting regarding new drug use sanctions.

7 comments, most recent 1 month ago

Wildflowers in Santa Ynez

By Guest WriterOn Mar 15, 2023

Garrett O’Brien guest writes. And just how do we get out of this housing mess?

21 comments, most recent 2 months ago

Rise of Medicare Advantage – Creation of a Myth

By Guest WriterOn Mar 06, 2023

Millions of Medicare recipients have already been schnookered into Medicare Advantage. Don’t be a victim. Fight back.

6 comments, most recent 2 months ago

Atul Explains Vote Against Jail Recommendations

By Guest WriterOn Feb 24, 2023

Atul Deshmane explains his dissenting vote on the new jail recommendation report of the Stakeholder Advisory Committee to the County Council

9 comments, most recent 2 months ago

Traditional Medicare - The Promise Is In Peril

By Guest WriterOn Jan 31, 2023

Excellent and succinct overview of Traditional Medicare, now under a very real threat. People are now waking up!

4 comments, most recent 3 months ago

Did Proposition 5 “Cure” Its Way to a Win?

By Guest WriterOn Dec 05, 2022

Is the passing of Prop 5 a genuine reflection of the will of the people of Whatcom County? John Marshall guest writes.

9 comments, most recent 5 months ago

Here We Go Again

By Guest WriterOn Nov 02, 2022

A lifetime dealing with abortion, an account by a lifelong advocate.

6 comments, most recent 6 months ago

How Our Government Has Used Nuclear Weapons since 1945

By Guest WriterOn Oct 24, 2022

John Repp writes how the flexing of the U.S. nuclear muscle was done, at various times, behind the scenes.

6 comments, most recent 2 months ago

An Obligation to Speak Up

By Guest WriterOn Jun 13, 2022

Satpal Sidhu writes on sensible gun laws. This is not freedom that we love, this is anarchy.

5 comments, most recent 10 months ago

Fiber vs. Cable vs. Wireless

By Guest WriterOn May 23, 2022

We know internet access is a big deal. We know about the digital divide. 5G is rolling out. Do you understand what’s going on? Leslie Shankman explains beautifully.

Death of the Golden Goose

By Guest WriterOn May 13, 2022

Taimi Gorman guest writes a Grim Fairhaven Fairy Tale

15 comments, most recent 1 year ago

A New Non-Defeatist Narrative

By Guest WriterOn Feb 02, 2022

“We either win big this November by defeating the coup and its Republican enablers — or we kiss our democracy goodbye.” Michael Moore

1 comment, most recent 1 year ago

Half of the Homeless Have Mental Issues

By Guest WriterOn Nov 12, 2021

Why People with Mental & Drug Addiction Issues are on the Streets: A Brief History and Solution

7 comments, most recent 1 year ago

Don’t Confuse Housing Affordability with Housing Choice

By Guest WriterOn Oct 14, 2021

We have an opportunity to assure affordable housing in Bellingham; let’s not squander it!

14 comments, most recent 1 year ago

Covid Vaccine Booster Shots: Immoral or Necessary?

By Guest WriterOn Sep 28, 2021

Is it boosting* from the world’s poor to get a booster in the U.S.?

4 comments, most recent 1 year ago

Bellingham: Beware!

By Guest WriterOn Aug 11, 2021

Guest Writer David Donohue explains Sunnyland’s experience with City Hall’s promises, code enforcement, and follow-thru.

7 comments, most recent 1 year ago

North State Street Dormitory Open for Business Fall 2021

By Guest WriterOn Jul 17, 2021

Yet another eyesore bunker-like building for bunking students at market rental rates.

3 comments, most recent 1 year ago

An Anniversary…or an End Date?

By Guest WriterOn May 23, 2021

Douglas Gustafson guest writes. Our two tiny home villages, and the possibility of a third, are in jeopardy. Do we need them?

3 comments, most recent 1 year ago

The Battle for Bellingham’s Tiny Homes

By Guest WriterOn Mar 20, 2021

Doug Gustafson offers a point/counterpoint account of opposing strategies for tiny homes

27 comments, most recent 2 years ago