About Jon Humphrey

Jon Humphrey is currently a music educator in Bellingham and very active in the community. He also has decades of professional IT experience including everything from support to development. He considers Bellingham to be the best place he has ever lived and has been here for over 8 years now. He has been interested in technology, music, and science since he was very young and holds a degree in Music Production/Technology from the prestigious Hartt School. He started writing for his high school newspaper and has even published a sci-fi novel on Amazon. Aside from his above interests, Jon spends his time repairing electronics, cars, hiking, diving, and motorcycling. He is a well known figure in the Open Source and Retro Gaming communities and does what he can to support them. He also cares very much about the environment, homelessness, and digital divide issues and does what he can on those fronts too.

By: Jon Humphrey (82)

A Resolution to Make Sure Nothing Gets Done

Broadband-Washing: Greenwashing the Internet

Broadband-Washing: Greenwashing the Internet


Recently, Whatcom County Council member Kaylee Galloway presented a Resolution on broadband policy to the council for approval. It’s worthless.

Several years ago when I spoke with new County Council member Kaylee Galloway, I got the sense she was about to get sucked into Whatcom County’s political machine. While she had seen the truth about the need for public fiber-optics from me, and the book “Fiber” by Susan Crawford, and the cities of Anacortes, Mount Vernon, Hillsboro, OR, Chattanooga, TN and many other sources, I knew the corporate interests in both the Democrat and Republican parties were about to wine and dine her. They would tell her sob stories about how they were “stake holders” and just couldn’t afford to do the right thing with their investment dollars. They would lie to her about other technologies, telling her they were as good as fiber, knowing full well that they were not. 

I had hoped Kaylee was smart enough to see through the lies. After all, every network that works well, has lots of fiber in it, and the best of them, from both a cost and reliability standpoint, are public. However, I know how the corporate wing of her party works, so I assumed that after her wining and dining she would be swayed, and give us some virtually worthless, half-assed solution…and make sure big telecom got a seat at the table.  

As expected, Galloway responded just like our “savior” PUD Commissioner Christine Grant did when she hired Chris Heimgartner, a pro-big-telecom guy as our PUD manager, and folded to special interests to protect big telecom. Remember, the PUD did a nationwide search and could have hired literally anyone, but they hired a guy who refers you to big telecom if you ask a question, and prioritizes big oil in everything he does. You may pay his salary, but he doesn’t work for you, he works for them, and Christine Grant made sure he would.

How do I know? The pretend-progressives in the Democratic Party contacted me to “check out Kaylee’s broadband resolution.” I figured, at best, it would be similar to the COB’s big-telecom-filled Broadband Advisory Group. Sadly, the reality in the county is even worse. 

A lot of the language in this Resolution is ripped off from the TAGNW document I wrote about here. The TAGNW document is the one Andrew Redding, Jamie Douglass, and special interests killed at about the same time they put internal pressure on TAGNW to fire Director Michael Gan for doing his job. In this Resolution presented to the County Council, all the teeth were taken out of the original document and any actual commitments were carefully avoided.

 I’ll explain each promise (?), point by point. Please use the “resolution” as a reference. You can jump over all the “WHEREAS-s” and go to, “NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED”:

 1. We resolve to notify interested parties that work is being done. This is known as an “inform only” policy. It doesn’t require any of the utilities to do anything useful, and doesn’t guarantee the installation of conduit or fiber. So it’s worthless. This policy was inspired by the city of Pasco’s worthless “inform only” policy. It is the greenwashing of the broadband world. It’s just here to make us think progress is taking place. It’s not. 

2. We resolve to spend lots of money developing a “notification system” to aid with useless point  Number 1, so big telecom can ignore these “opportunities to coordinate construction activities,” just as they always have.

3. The wording here says they will consider internet a needed utility if they feel like it. They will, however, continue to base connectivity on the virtually worthless federal and state standards, and use inaccurate testing (as I’ve written about before). Bottom line, this means if you can get some connectivity from a potato you’ve stuck two wires in, and big telecom says it’s adequate with their inaccurate testers, no action will be necessary. So, Number 3 is also a commitment to do either next to nothing, or in most cases, nothing at all. It is the intentional illusion of progress. Just like the way they’re approaching climate change.

4. They will use state Equity, Diversity, Accessibility and Inclusion (EDI) funds for broadband, but again the funding is based on inaccurate testing and considers non-fiber broadband to be equivalent to fiber in most cases. In short, most of the money goes to big telecom, (who overcharge for their services). Instead, money that could have been spent building real infrastructure disappears into the pockets of special interests and no robust infrastructure is built. Big telecom dictates how everything happens and we spend a bunch of money on next to nothing. 

5. This is the most laughable part. The county says it will partner with the Port and PUD, who have intentionally missed opportunities to build out robust public fiber. They again only commit to notification of work, aka, the inform-only policy, and generally agree that it is a good idea to talk to each other. Not take real action, just talk. Maybe. The PUD manager’s letter included in these documents says basically that he just thinks it’s a good idea, probably.

6. This section commits the county to working with established entities, some of them big telecom, to provide Third World Level access to the internet for those Whatcom County residents who aren’t connected. Maybe. No commitments to build a robust public fiber network are made. Hell, they don’t even commit to supporting small community fiber projects, which they could easily do. 

In the end, this document is broadband-washing—the broadband equivalent of greenwashing. Kaylee Galloway is a fake progressive, like all the establishment Democrats have proven themselves to be. Granted, I’m sure the Republicans twisted their arms to get to this point, but when are we going to get anyone in government who has a spine and will push back?!

A county-wide public fiber network was originally conceived of at less than $100 million dollars. A Dig Once Policy reduces the cost of fiber installation by 90%. Fiber and conduit are the least expensive parts of the process with excavation being the grand majority of the cost. Fiber then pays for its own installation cost via leasing and many other economic opportunities like attracting next-generation businesses. So, how did we end up with a resolution that doesn’t require at least the installation of some conduit and fiber when we’re already doing an excavation?? We need a Dig Once Policy with real commitments. Not whatever bullshit this is. This document is shameful.

I wonder where Whatcom County/Bellingham would be if our elected officials spent half as much time protecting our interests as they do their big donors in special interest groups? Care to give us an answer Kaylee? Nevermind, I know you won’t. Like Christine Grant, now you only talk to people approved of by the party, not the citizens you’re taking advantage of.

Oh yeah, one final laughable thing. The documents talk about creating another “advisory panel.” By this point we all know that panel will be filled with big telecom reps and their sympathizers, right? Just like the COB did with their big-telecom-filled Broadband Advisory Group. So get ready for CBAG, or the Countywide Big-telecom Ass-kissing Group. You’ll recognize it because we’ve seen it before.

Boy, do I hate being right all the time.

About Jon Humphrey

Citizen Journalist • Bellingham • Member since May 23, 2017

Jon Humphrey is currently a music educator in Bellingham and very active in the community. He also has decades of professional IT experience including everything from support to development. He [...]

Brian McNitt

Apr 09, 2024

Meanwhile, The FCC just quadrupled the download speed required to market internet as ‘broadband’. Says Engaget, “ISPs now have to offer 100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up to slap the coveted label on their services.” So where does Bellingham and Whatcom County stand?


Richard Verbree

Apr 09, 2024

Have you heard about tmobile 5g gateway?, it’s $50/month unlimited data. I have one, it works great. It handles 6-7 devises with ease…..and if you don’t have cell service there is starlink. It is more $ but works anywhere you can see the sky…...so…...public fiber is not as important as it was a few years ago


Jon Humphrey

Apr 10, 2024

Both of these comments are nonsensical and ignore real data.
Comment #1 - Ignores the need for upload speeds to support modern video conferencing. It’s not just about download speeds. It also ignroes the fact that FCC, and WA state, speed tests are based on inaccurate browser based tests that are virtually worthless. Stated ISP speeds are always “up to” meaning the real performance in Whatcom County, and everywhere, is far below the “FCC standard.” That’s why we need load testing. Here is a link to the RRUL documentation for load testing.
Comment #2 - All services require lots of fiber to work correctly. Even Elon Musk is out there talking about how he needs more fiber on the ground for Starlink to work correctly. None of these services are equivalent to fiber. You are comparing apples and oranges. Also, we’ve load tested T-Mobile sevices, they suck. High latency, lots of drop outs, speeds of 2 Mbits. In Hillsboro, OR $50 a month gets you 1,000 Mbit download and upload speeds with fiber to the home on their public network. Trying to build anynetwork without fiber is like saying you can build a high speed road without asphalt.
Both comments ignore the fact that we are way behind the rest of the developed world when it comes to broadband. 1,000 Mbit (aka Gigiabit) fiber to the home is $25/month in South Korea and Japan, for example. We pay the highest prices, for the worst service, in the developed world in the US. Whatcom County is in awful shape compared to places with public fiber like Mount Venron, Anacortes, Hillsboro, OR, Chatanooga, TN and more. Our infrastructure is made out of silly putty.


Richard Verbree

Apr 10, 2024

The authors attitude in the article and response to the comments are very abrasive and “my way or the highway” style polarizing. Not helpful to civil public discourse or lack thereof. I do aggree that the county council is largely a do nothing group. They virtue signal alot, say nice sounding stuff and do nothing


John Servais

Apr 10, 2024

Actually, Jon’s comment is within the guidelines for comments on NW Citizen.  He does not make any personal insults but rather sticks to the issue and facts.  Yes, his writing is sharp, concise and does not waste words on courtesies.

I founded NW Citizen 30 years ago and am now one of the three owners.  Sharp discussion is something that we accept here.  Indeed, in my 5 decades of political civic activism in this county, I have foound that if the ‘powers that be’ do not like what a critic says or writes, no matter how politely, they will find some reason to  marginalize that person.  I am not suggesting that Mr. Verbree is part of that practice, but I think his comment and concern is incorrect in that Jon sticks to the issue.  And that is what is needed for civic dialog.

For NW Citizen, the line is at personal insults, with the exception of elected public officials.  We have cancelled commenters for violating that and we have at times removed the comments.  Jon is a serious researcher of the facts around Internet and broadband access in our county and we embrace his writing here on NW Citizen.


Jon Humphrey

Apr 11, 2024

Thanks John, we see comments that try to move us away from the core issues and exclude numbers and facts when no good counterargument can be made. For example, Cat 7 cable can be run for about 100 meters with no loss. Fiber 100 Kilometers. Millimeter wave, like in 5G, claims about 91 meters, but they are easily disrupted. These differences matter, a lot Kaylee, etc.

To comment, Log In or Register

A Resolution to Make Sure Nothing Gets Done

By Jon HumphreyOn Apr 09, 2024

Broadband-Washing: Greenwashing the Internet

6 comments, most recent 1 month ago

COB - Your Interests vs. Corporate Interests

By Jon HumphreyOn Mar 18, 2024

No public fiber means we can’t compete with big telecom. EVER.

4 comments, most recent 1 month ago

Thanks to the City of Bellingham

By Jon HumphreyOn Nov 09, 2023

The city comes through on public wi-fi hotspots

1 comment, most recent 6 months ago

Is Hydrogen the Answer?

By Jon HumphreyOn Oct 26, 2023

The truth is out there; Jon Humphrey has researched the issues and concisely compiled the results.

5 comments, most recent 6 months ago

Getting What You Pay For

By Jon HumphreyOn Aug 28, 2023

$3.5 million Point Roberts Broadband project: is it worth it?

1 comment, most recent 7 months ago

Whatcom Democrats Are Pro-Jail?!

By Jon HumphreyOn Apr 19, 2023

Moreover, is a new jail of any size necessary?

2 comments, most recent 1 year ago

TAGNW Recaptured By Big Telecom

By Jon HumphreyOn Feb 22, 2023

With the loss of Michael Gan, TAGNW has become a puppet organization of big telecom that is aggressively working against the public interest.

4 comments, most recent 1 year ago

Secret Conversations

By Jon HumphreyOn Feb 08, 2023

How Democratic Party Leaders and Elected Officials Are Abusing “Signal” to Have Secret Conversations about Public Topics

5 comments, most recent 1 year ago

The Impression of Progress on F-Street

By Jon HumphreyOn Jan 23, 2023

Public Works successfully gave the impression of progress, without actually having to bother

Hillsboro’s Public Fiber Success Could Be Ours, If We Push

By Jon HumphreyOn Jan 05, 2023

Hillsboro Oregon’s higher median income and lower cost of living could be ours if we push our public officials into public fiber internet.

No Responses

By Jon HumphreyOn Nov 20, 2022

A running Record of the Zero Transparency Policies of the PUD, Port, County and City Councils From 1/12/2022 Onward

6 comments, most recent 1 year ago

The Dark Side of Sharon Shewmake

By Jon HumphreyOn Oct 19, 2022

This article was inspired by a Letter to the Editor on NWCitizen on 10/08/22

What Cascadia Daily News Should Have Said

By Jon HumphreyOn Sep 30, 2022

CDN did a report on a report. Where was the investigative journalism?

5 comments, most recent 1 year ago

Northern Light Reprints County Council Broadband Lies, and I can’t figure out why they’re lying…

By Jon HumphreyOn Sep 11, 2022

The author outlines definitional problems in our broadband efforts

Council Advised Against Talking to the Public

By Jon HumphreyOn Jul 27, 2022

County attorneys advise elected officials NOT to talk to us.

10 comments, most recent 1 year ago

Paying More to Get Less

By Jon HumphreyOn Jul 21, 2022

Whatcom County will not attract business or talent without fiber.

Sharon Shewmake: Corporate Democrat, Riveter, Tied to Big Telecom

By Jon HumphreyOn Jun 13, 2022

Still No Dig Once Policy? Here’s Why

22 comments, most recent 1 year ago

Greenwashing: The Filter on a Cigarette

By Jon HumphreyOn Jun 09, 2022

Green Ribbon Schools, clean hydrogen, and recyclable plastics are propaganda campaigns

1 comment, most recent 1 year ago

Geneva Cell Tower Protest

By Jon HumphreyOn May 18, 2022

Board member acknowledges illegal contract

3 comments, most recent 2 years ago

130 Foot Cell Tower Approved for Geneva, Neighbors Blindsided

By Jon HumphreyOn May 16, 2022

Tower to be built in residential neighborhood, near two elementary schools

5 comments, most recent 2 years ago