Topic: Planning & Development (339)

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

The good? We are no longer spewing forty+ pounds of mercury vapor every day into the local atmosphere. We are no longer dumping 20 to 40 tons of polluted solid waste into our bay, ravines and gravel p

The good? We are no longer spewing forty+ pounds of mercury vapor every day into the local atmosphere. We are no longer dumping 20 to 40 tons of polluted solid waste into our bay, ravines and gravel p

The good? We are no longer spewing forty+ pounds of mercury vapor every day into the local atmosphere. We are no longer dumping 20 to 40 tons of polluted solid waste into our bay, ravines and gravel pits every day.

The bad? Georgia Pacific is never going to clean up the toxic legacy their profits externalized, leaving them all over our home to wreck the neural networks of our children (9MB .mov). Public officials gave G.P. a "get-out-of-jail-free" card, saddling the public with the costs. Now clean-up is too expensive, so a cover-up, or capping, has become our cost-effective alternative. Everybody agrees, or at least all the government agencies that colluded to allow it to happen in the first place.

The ugly? The public has already incurred the health risk of G.P. operating for three decades after environmental officials with any pretense of professional credibility had to know that the mercury-cell chlor-alkali facility was a threat to food and water supplies, human health and the environment. Remember Minimata? That was 1957. By the early sixties, when this plant was being permitted, everyone knew it would be a mess, and did it anyway.

Uglier? Public waterfront land, built at public expense to support water-dependent commerce and industry, will be lost forever as it is sold off for private residences - private residences that have been administratively assumed from the beginning to eventually constitute about 60% of the "New Whatcom" "mixed-use" master plan. Administratively assumed? That means that nobody's opinion has really meant one whit otherwise. That's public process! That steals hundreds of millions from the public.

Ugliest? Stealing further untold hundreds of millions from the public - also without the slightest discussion. Huh? That's right! The New Whatcom fiasco is likely the biggest rip-off of Whatcom County ever. You'd think it would make the news. hah!

The biggest rip-off has also been assumed from the beginning. It is the conversion of G.P.'s treatment lagoon into a marina. Marinas are not the most environmentally benign facilities. Boats are actually real stinkers, sloughing copper, tin and zinc into the water and leaking oily wastes, detergents, waxes and other products. Don't get me wrong. I like boats and I like marinas. So what's the problem?

The problem is that we will need to replace that treatment capacity. Our growing community will require more treatment capacity in several different categories. We can expect to need additional sanitary treatment. That's just a matter of so many more dwelling units, and nobody seems willing to regulate growth.

Then there are the mandates. We already expect to be required to provide treatment for our urban run-off. Governor Gregoire just announced ambitious plans to restore the Puget Sound near-shore habitat. It's a billions of dollars, never-ending initiative that will never get off square one without treating polluted stormwater. Besides, do we want to restore our bay just to re-pollute it? No. We will want to protect our public expenditures for shoreline and bay restoration by preventing future pollution. That requires treatment.

Finally, G.P. is gone, but does that mean we will never want jobs again? Probably not. The public already owns a large industrial water supply to the central waterfront. Without treatment capacity, it cannot be used. If the lagoon is converted to a marina, we will need to provide additional treatment capacity before we can deliver water to any new industrial process on the waterfront. How valuable is water supply and treatment capacity for recruiting business? Whether semi-conductor production or anything else, it will never happen once these resources are gone. Well, they are almost gone.

It is possible that we could keep the treatment capacity AND have three times the marina (150kb .pdf), while completing the Bay Trail from Boulevard to the foot of Cornwall. The basic premise was already approved by our state legislature at this very site. But that has never since been discussed, either. That's public process!

Buyers (taxpayers) beware. Your government is ripping you off, making their short-term revenues look really good while knowing - but not telling - that it will cost you hundreds and hundreds of millions later. That's ugly!

About Tip Johnson

Citizen Journalist and Editor • Member since Jan 11, 2008

To comment, Log In or Register

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

By Tip JohnsonOn Nov 26, 2006

The good? We are no longer spewing forty+ pounds of mercury vapor every day into the local atmosphere. We are no longer dumping 20 to 40 tons of polluted solid waste into our bay, ravines and gravel p

I love a good library system

By John ServaisOn Oct 14, 2006

Nice little slanted piece in today’s Bellingham Herald by Sam Taylor. He says “Some in the community have clamored for (library) branches…”. Clamor. Apparently we are not requesting or petitioning o

Branches vs main library

By John ServaisOn Sep 20, 2006

For the record, the library administration reacted to the post below by shifting the argument from branches to drive times and looking to give us crumbs from the main library bond issue in the form of

Meeting in the middle of a business day

By John ServaisOn Sep 18, 2006

The Bellingham Library Board of Trustees will meet Tue, Sep 19 at 2:30 pm in the basement meeting room of the downtown library - the room across the hall from the Children’s Library. The public

We need branch libraries - not a new main library

By John ServaisOn Sep 17, 2006

This coming Tuesday, our Bellingham Library Board of Trustees may make a decision on where to locate a new, huge, downtown library building. The plan is to ask voters to pass a bond issue of several t

Mercury in Lake Whatcom

By John ServaisOn Jun 03, 2004

Today the Washington Department of Ecology released a report that says, basically, that mercury in the lake is less now than in the past. “Decreasing” is the operative word.

Local conservatives

Re: Chamber of Commerce insert in today’s Bellingham Herald

By John ServaisOn May 24, 2004

The initiative is ‘remove motor boats’, notremove boats’ from Lake Whatcom. Our Chamber of Commerce just lies in print to achieve their goal of defeating the initiative.

Benzene in Lake Whatcom water

By John ServaisOn Feb 13, 2004

We see 1/100 of one part per billion or less of benzene to water during most of the year 2000 and into the spring of 2001. Then in the summer we see the amount rise by ten fold to over 1/10 of one par

Not political conservative but real conservative

By John ServaisOn Feb 12, 2004

Motor boats off Lake Whatcom? What was that apology from City Senior Planner Chris Spens at the city council on Monday? El-bull-in-china-shop Chris got the word from el mayor that the motor-boat initi

Mercury, anyone?

By John ServaisOn Feb 09, 2004

We have mercury contamination all over our county. That we know. Lake Whatcom and Bellingham Bay. Georgia Pacific’s chlorine plant leaked mercury for about 35 years and neither GP nor our environmenta

Lack of environmental enforcement

By John ServaisOn Nov 23, 2003

of some local developers is plain to see in this photo essay at the Lake Whatcom website. The WA Dept of Ecology has enforcement folks tooling around in their spiffy pickups, but no enforcement for th

Very quietly, more and more liberals are

By John ServaisOn Oct 13, 2003

telling me they are voting for Brett Bonner for mayor. Some very prominent ones - but they are not going public. Why not? Fear of retaliation.

Why are they against Mark? Two reasons in general.

Mayoral Debate

By John ServaisOn Oct 08, 2003

The two differed strongly on several issues. The differences between them are becoming more apparent and this should continue for the next two weeks.

Brett continues to develop his Lake Whatcom

Remember the ‘Truth Squad’?

By John ServaisOn Oct 05, 2003

We need one to follow Asmundson during the next three weeks - and to nudge the Herald to do minimal checking of facts before publishing. I’m referring to Friday’s post below, where it was noted how St

Election Forums

By John ServaisOn Sep 30, 2003

The first of three Bellingham Herald Election Forums is taking place this evening at the County Council chambers.

The forums are being broadcast live on KGMI radio, 790 AM. You can see the vide

A stand must be taken to protect water quality

By John ServaisOn Jun 25, 2003

Posted here because the Bellingham Herald has now ignored this for two days. Of very high importance to Bellingham - and with significant developments.

The system does not work when there are no checks on state agencies

By John ServaisOn Jun 13, 2003

St. Joe’s Hospital will probably be facing fines for venting toxic gas into the construction area of their new addition. Our Bellingham Herald has not reported a bit of this. Rumor has it that one or

City Council support for Clean Water Alliance

By John ServaisOn May 13, 2003

The Bellingham City Council last night voted 5-2 to support the Clean Water Alliance legal action against Whatcom County’s designation of Sudden Valley as an Urban Growth Area (UGA). Grant Deger and B

Very first PFD meeting finally scheduled

By John ServaisOn May 12, 2003

The Bellingham City Council will finally hold its very first public hearing of the Public Facilities District (PFD) proposals next Monday, May 19, 7 pm at city hall. Really - the