Topic: Lake Whatcom (53)

Fixing Lake Whatcom: A New Approach

Enoch J. Ledet guest writes, advocating for a better method of cleaning Lake Whatcom of the phosphorus. The phosphorus that our drinking water must not contain.

Enoch J. Ledet guest writes, advocating for a better method of cleaning Lake Whatcom of the phosphorus. The phosphorus that our drinking water must not contain.

By

Enoch J. Ledet guest writes. Enoch is retired from a career in petrochemical research and marketing. He has lived the past 16 years in Sudden Valley, on Lake Whatcom.

- - -

Note to reader: This article is a summary of his full report. The full report is a pdf and is linked at the bottom of this summary article.

- - -

Lake Whatcom water users, tax payers, and new storm water district customers are being required to fund the construction of Best Management Practice (BMP) storm water filters to trap and remove external phosphorous before it enters the lake. BMP filter construction is an integral part of the Department of Ecology’s Total Mass Daily Load (TMDL) on phosphorous (P) and bacteria. DOE estimates it will have to filter/remove 3,140 lbs. of phosphorous from stormwater runoff to bring the lake back to 2002-3 Dissolved Oxygen (DO) concentrations. DOE has used data from WWU researchers stating that phosphorous is the main cause for low dissolved oxygen in the lake. In 1998, due to Low DO in Basins 1 and 2, the EPA placed Lake Whatcom on its 303d list of polluted waters.

Tax and fee payers are being assessed a total of $100 million over the next 50 years to pay for implementation and maintenance of these BMP storm water filters. The new storm water district fee will collect an estimated $41 million ($820,000 x 50 years) of the total $100 million from Lake Whatcom water users outside the City of Bellingham. Bellingham tax payers have already been assessed a stormwater tax/fee. However, data from 2019 shows that in the last 12 years of operation, BMP filters have only prevented 436 lbs. of phosphorous, (out of 3,140 lbs.,) from entering the lake. This is an average of 36.3 lbs. of phosphorous per year. If we are able to capture the anticipated 3,140 lbs. of phosphorous, it will have been at a cost of $32,000 per pound.

Research indicates that the best BMP filters remove only 50% of external phosphorous (EP) and don’t address the internal phosphorous (IP) already present in lake sediment at all. This internal phosphorous recycles annually, causing algae and blue-green bacteria. The bacterial degradation of the algae is one cause of oxygen depletion, enabling anaerobic biochemical reactions to occur. This repeating cycle of “bloom and bust” negatively impacts lake water quality and increases drinking water treatment costs.

Currently, we are only addressing the external phosphorous input into Lake Whatcom. There are two problems with this approach. 1) Not all “EP pathways” into the lake have been identified; i.e., point sources such as streams, creeks, ditches, etc., and non-point sources such as developed or undeveloped land near the lake; and 2) even the best BMP filters for removing EP can not be used to treat all EP pathways into the lake. Naturally, filtering will not address the Internal Phosphorous (IP) already present in lake sediment.

Since all EP pathways (point source and non-point source) flow into the lake, and BMPs have to be fortified with alum/aluminum salts to increase BMP filter efficiencies, why not save money (operations and maintenance construction costs), as well as implementation time, and add alum directly to lake waters to bind EP inflow pathways into the lake? Alum will also bind IP in the water column and sediments already in the lake. Numerous case studies show that in-lake treatment of internal phosphorus (IP), using alum (aluminum sulfate) is 50 times more effective/efficient than using external BMPs and is one-tenth the cost.

Wisconsin studies on alum addition to lakes to control phosphorus and mitigate algae/phytoplankton growth also show that it is both cost effective and safe to use. Alum is and has been safely used in drinking water treatment plants, including Bellingham’s water treatment plant, all over the United States, and in Europe.

Bellingham’s Public Works Department could run a three-year beta test in Basin 1 to evaluate whether alum-addition removes enough phosphorus and algae to restore sufficient oxygen to provide healthy fish habitat and remove DOE’s determination of “polluted waters” for our lake. WWU and a third party environmental lab would provide analysis on: alum-addition effectiveness and efficiency of binding and removing TP, control and management of phytoplankton growth/reproduction, and verify or refute the DOE/WWU statement that phosphorus is the main cause of low DO in Basin 1

My causal analysis of low dispersed oxygen in Lake Whatcom, and research over the last 15 years into solutions for DO-impaired lakes and drinking water reservoirs, has led to the conclusion/proposal that DOE and CoB will need a combination of solutions to manage not only Total Phosphorous (external stormwater phosphorus and internal water column and sediment phosphorus) as well as phytoplankton, and supplemental Oxygen. Using a combined, holistic, in-lake solution can save local taxpayers $50 – $80 million over the next 50 years and be implemented within two years. Measurable improvements in Lake Whatcom water quality will be realized in 10 years vs. the 50-year implementation time for current Total Mass Daily Load phosphorus solution focused on managing EP only.

Related Links

About Guest Writer

Citizen Journalist • Member since Jun 15, 2008

Comments by Readers

Dianne Foster

Aug 22, 2020

What most of us have been working for is stopping development on the lake -  that would be the most effective.  But of course after decades of county council doing nothing (except a few purchase of development rights),   now it is overdeveloped,  and we the taxpayers have to clean it up…..

Read More...
To comment, Log In or Register

Fixing Lake Whatcom: A New Approach

By Guest WriterOn Aug 18, 2020

Enoch J. Ledet guest writes, advocating for a better method of cleaning Lake Whatcom of the phosphorus. The phosphorus that our drinking water must not contain.

1 comment, most recent 1 year ago

Water Well Drilling Moratorium is Bad Idea

By Elisabeth BrittOn Nov 25, 2016

A counter to the Eric Hirst inspired decision of the county council to clamp a total moratorium on drilling new water wells in Whatcom County - and thus a home building ban.

1 comment, most recent 4 years ago

Unregulated vacation rentals on Lake Whatcom

By Tani SutleyOn Dec 21, 2015

Tani Sutley writes on the continuing issue of houses in residential zones that are used essentially as hotels and disrupt quiet neighborhoods.

Whatcom Farmers and Eric Hirst Dialog

By Eric HirstOn Dec 19, 2015

Statement by Whatcom Family Farmers on “Eric Hirst and his water ideas” and Hirst’s Reply

1 comment, most recent 5 years ago

Whatcom Co.: 90 Million Gallons of Water a Day

By Eric HirstOn Jul 22, 2015

Eric Hirst provides us all with a well researched report on Whatcom County water issues - rights, Lake Whatcom, ground water and more.

10 comments, most recent 6 years ago

County proposes free pass for vacation rentals

By Tani SutleyOn Apr 26, 2015

Tani Sutley writes a second article on the increasing number of vacation rentals - and the County Council bill to let them expand dramatically.

4 comments, most recent 6 years ago

Lodging Goals for Whatcom County

By Tani SutleyOn Jan 08, 2015

Tani Sutley guest writes about the vacation rentals situation and presents goals for the county council to consider for improving our rural neighborhoods.

1 comment, most recent 6 years ago

Whatcom County and the New Sharing Economy

By Tani SutleyOn Dec 09, 2014

Tani Sutley writes of how unregulated vacation rentals are invading the Lake Whatcom watershed. She urges action before the Planning Commission meeting on 11 December.

4 comments, most recent 6 years ago

Water, Water Everywhere, but ...

By Terry WechslerOn Apr 19, 2014

or How Not to Plan for Future Generations’ Water Needs

12 comments, most recent 7 years ago

Lecture on County Water Issues Draws Crowd

By Wendy HarrisOn Dec 06, 2013

The county will be required to consider water quality and water quantity when planning rural growth.

3 comments, most recent 7 years ago

Our Water - War or Pieces?

By Guest WriterOn May 24, 2013

Marian Beddill provides a general guide for the public, with a look at the history of water rights in Washington state.

4 comments, most recent 8 years ago

Closing Arguments in Defense of the Reconveyance

By Guest WriterOn Mar 11, 2013

Guest writer Shane Roth writes in favor of the reconveyance of Lake Whatcom land back to the county.

1 comment, most recent 8 years ago

Aquatic Invasive Species Plan for Lake Whatcom

By Wendy HarrisOn Jan 28, 2013

Improving ecosystem functions holistically is the best form of protection for the Lake Whatcom.

1 comment, most recent 8 years ago

Is Noncompliance Addicting?

By Wendy HarrisOn Jan 11, 2013

A proposed amendment to the Lake Whatcom watershed moratorium will increase water quality degradation

1 comment, most recent 8 years ago

Noncompliance 2013: The Game

By Wendy HarrisOn Jan 06, 2013

Watch the Whatcom County Council wiggle its way out of the latest round of GMA compliance requirements for Lake Whatcom

1 comment, most recent 8 years ago

City Staff Lacks Impartiality On Dock Closure

By Wendy HarrisOn May 15, 2012

A City staff memo on the Bloedel dock closure reads more like an advocacy brief

Squalicum Mountain development gets favors from county

By Guest WriterOn Feb 18, 2012

No EIS - no real county planning concern about developing Squalicum Mountain and degrading Lake Whatcom water even further.

Lake regulations will increase development

By Wendy HarrisOn Nov 14, 2011

Proposed new storm water regulations will increase Lake Whatcom development. Hearing this Thursday.

1 comment, most recent 9 years ago

Lake Whatcom Issues Ignored During Elections

By Wendy HarrisOn Nov 06, 2011

Important events concerning the Lake occurred during the election with little comment from the public, the candidates or the media.

16 comments, most recent 9 years ago

Loss of trust in Washington Conservation Voters

By Guest WriterOn Oct 19, 2011

Sue Taylor guest writes this perspective on WCV and their alliance with the Dan Pike for mayor campaign.

16 comments, most recent 10 years ago