Topic: Waterfront (74)

Last Chance - Steal this Waterfront!

Byy On

In a Bellingham Herald article dated May 4, Interim Mayor Tim Douglas “said it’s too soon to make assumptions about the exact relationship between parks acreage and the intensity of development on the rest of the waterfront.” According to Douglas, the waterfront Master Plan, as well as the Port/City development agreement will get “intense public review.”

Well, it’s not working yet. According to another Herald article on May 7, about a dozen people testified at each of two public hearings on the scope of the project’s Environmental Impact Statement. That’s 0.014% of the estimated 166,814 population of Whatcom County, which the Port soaked for almost $7 million in property taxes this year. That’s over $41 per man, woman and child. It’s been happening every year - since 1920. Probably more than half of those in attendance at the hearings were Port staff or shills.

Now it’s your last chance to say what you think is important to study. Comments will be accepted through tomorrow (Fri, May 11). Comments can be emailed to .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address), or snailmailed to SEPA Responsible Official, Port of Bellingham, P.O. Box 1677, Bellingham, WA 98227-1677.

Meanwhile, letters to editors and spoken comments around town are increasingly expressing a sense that the Port is ramrodding an attempt to rip off our public waterfront for their development buddies. In the Port’s most recently contrived presentations, they have begun enforcing the notion that if the public wants waterfront parks, they will need to endure a blockade of buildings taller than Bellingham has ever seen. Poppycock!

The “public” is already paying the health costs of G-P’s toxic legacy. Bellingham already suffered 40 years of lost opportunity while G-P hogged the waterfront with its acrid spume. The bay, once a rich oyster farm, is now a toxic dead zone - a mercury dump the Port wishes to leave in place for the neurologic disadvantage of our children’s developing brains (see Related Links: How Mercury Causes Brain Neuron Degeneration [9MB .mov]). The public will pay to clean up the mess because the Port, in it’s public-service wisdom, let G-P totally off the hook. We will also pay for the infrastructure to support any development - and the maintenance, in perpetuity. We already pay the Port to “manage” our waterfront resources. Ha!

Some management! Waterfront lands, which in Bellingham were also constructed at public expense, should be managed for what they are - a scarce and valuable resource. In most planning contexts, scarce resources are carefully marshalled for their best use. Waterfronts ought to be reserved for water-dependent, water-related and public uses - not sold off for a one-time shot in the arm for the Port bureaucracy.

But the Port has more grandiose dreams of filling their coffers with development cash while choking the public off the shoreline - or at best, leaving the public with the withering threads and scraps of lawn between parking lots and building entrances. A social and economic assessment of the potential benefits to our county-wide population of public space versus intensive development on the waterfront would make a very good starting place. But it is not likely to happen.

Mayor Douglas, in the May 4 article, also says that agreement on the development scheme is not likely to happen in this calendar year. How many concerned citizens will still have the energy to attend hearings after another year of meetings? Probably we should just vote on it.

For a glimpse of what the Port is thinking will emerge through their protracted exhaustion of interested citizens, please watch a new promotional film being presented on Government TV, channel 10. You can get the schedule here. I haven’t seen it yet, but will predict it is, again, full of whopping doozers. See what you think and send your thoughts to your elected representatives at the .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) and .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address). And don’t forget the Port’s new SEPA official!

Last chance!

About Tip Johnson

Citizen Journalist and Editor • Member since Jan 11, 2008

To comment, Log In or Register

Last Chance - Steal this Waterfront!

By Tip JohnsonOn May 10, 2007

In a Bellingham Herald article dated May 4, Interim Mayor Tim Douglas “said it’s too soon to make assumptions about the exact relationship between parks acreage and the intensity of [...]

The Port’s Plan to Poison

By Tip JohnsonOn Apr 26, 2007

Why the Log Pond cap won’t workAn article in a recent Bellingham Business Journal detailed the debate over whether the toxic muck in the Whatcom Waterway ought to be [...]

The So-called News

By Tip JohnsonOn Apr 23, 2007

Independent media? Freedom of the press? Peoples friend, tyrants foe? It was a good idea while it lasted, educating the electorate and forming a mainstay of our democracy. Now, we’[...]

Poisoning the Public - A treacherous legacy

By Tip JohnsonOn Apr 18, 2007

According to the Bellingham Herald, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources has recently approved leaving tons of mercury buried in Bellingham Bay. The documents are not yet readily available [...]

Your Waterfront - Up for grabs

By Tip JohnsonOn Apr 18, 2007

New Whatcom Redevelopment Project - The City and Port of Bellingham will hold public information a meeting. Bellingham Cruise Terminal. 355 Harris Ave., Bellingham. WA Times: 6:00 PM.Also, the Port has [...]

Response to Bellingham Herald editorial

By John ServaisOn Jan 25, 2007

Today’s Bellingham Herald editorial invites an answer. The editorial is good in that it reflects on past bad practices, like allowing GP to dump mercury into Bellingham Bay, and [...]

Moving Target

By Tip JohnsonOn Dec 11, 2006

One of the more momentous public hearings in Bellingham’s history appears to be ready to pass with more than the ordinary confusion. We wrote about some of the mis/[...]

Public meeting & hearing rescheduled

By John ServaisOn Nov 30, 2006

Notice:Relative to the last post:Ecology has rescheduled the public meeting for:December 7th, 6:30 p.m. ñ 8:30 p.m., Bellingham Cruise Terminal, 355 Harris Avenue, Bellingham, WAEcology has rescheduled the public [...]

Public Process - Lots of it (kind of),

By Tip JohnsonOn Nov 27, 2006

or I lied (sort of!)In the previous post I complained that the biggest rip-off in Whatcom County history was happening without even being discussed or making it into the [...]

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

By Tip JohnsonOn Nov 26, 2006

The good? We are no longer spewing forty+ pounds of mercury vapor every day into the local atmosphere. We are no longer dumping 20 to 40 tons of polluted solid waste into [...]

Traffic and Western Washington University

By John ServaisOn Mar 01, 2004

If WWU gets their way, $20 million in state taxes will be spent on jack-hammering out good roads and building new ones a hundred yards away. No increase in safety nor [...]

The Port Commissioner campaign is getting hot

By John ServaisOn Aug 27, 2003

Ginny Benton, seeking her third term as commissioner, stated this evening at the Rome Grange that she will not respond to the “mud slinging” being done against her. She will “[...]

Web site to check out

By John ServaisOn May 12, 2003

Waterfront Futures for Bellingham - nothing here. This is one of those processes that is supposedly open to public comment. However, speaking to a meeting seems a challenge. Getting on [...]

Tis time to focus on local issues

By John ServaisOn May 01, 2003

Elections this fall could bring positive change to Whatcom County and Bellingham. In particular, we need a new Mayor and we need a new Port Commissioner. The challenge is not [...]