Topic: Open Government (268)

Ranked Choice Voting Always Beats Winner-Take-All

Voting on a karaoke song contest offers an opportunity for a clear view of Ranked Choice Voting

Voting on a karaoke song contest offers an opportunity for a clear view of Ranked Choice Voting

RCV Always Beats Winner-Take-All

On a recent weeknight there was yet another demonstration of why we should start using ranked choice voting as soon as we can. The event was billed as Karaoke with the Candidates. It was held at Boundary Bay Brewery and had been organized as a campaign event by three of our local candidates (Eve Smason-Marcus, Kristina Michele Martens, and Eddy Ury). FairVote Washington had been invited to conduct the ranked choice election of best singer. We’ll get to that in a moment.

We’ll Conduct an Election for Any Group

Right after the end of the candidate filing period in May, FairVote Washington sent a questionnaire to 2,600 candidates around the state (all those who had supplied email addresses when filing their candidacies) asking them their views about ranked choice voting (RCV) and offering to send an information packet or to have a meeting with FairVote workers if they needed more information. Among the Whatcom candidates 16 have returned the questionnaire. The inset shows the significant support for ranked choice voting among local candidates.

I want to make it clear that our conducting the karaoke election was not an endorsement of these three candidates. FairVote Washington is a nonpartisan nonprofit. We have offered all 16 our services if they want to hold an event in which there would be some kind of election. Could be Karaoke singers, could be deserts, could be favorite Whatcom parks. The offer is open to any group at all: business groups, unions, neighborhood groups, clubs of any kind, service clubs. The list is long. If any of these groups used RCV for their internal elections they would achieve election results more reflective of the views of their members.

During the 2019 election season we conducted a favorite picnic foods election for a Garrett O’Brien event. Barry Buchanan asked us to run an election in October for one of his fund raisers. What people will be voting on is not yet specified.

But now back to the karaoke.

RCV: Majority Support for Those Elected

In the karaoke challenge, there were nine individual contestants and a group. There were 33 audience members/voters. The singers entertained us with their enthusiastic performances and we really appreciate their support in agreeing to participate in the demonstration. 

As you probably know, voters in a ranked choice election can express their support for as many candidates as they like – and then rank their choices. Right there, a ranked choice election reflects the views of voters better than the method that we currently use where you are forced to pick just one candidate when you may like several. The counting then proceeds in rounds until someone gets a majority. If someone gets a majority in the first round, they are elected and that’s all there is to it. If no one has a majority at that point, the person with the fewest votes is eliminated and the ballots on which that person was the first choice are transferred to the next choice on those ballots. There’s a new tally to see if someone now has a majority. If yes, they’re in. If no, you remove the candidate with the fewest votes – and so on around the circle until someone has a majority. 

The tabulation for the karaoke election was done by people physically moving around the room. The voters all kept their ballots as a guide for where they should move next. Each contestant had a sign with his or her name on it. They arranged themselves around the room. Then each voter moved to the sign of the contestant who was the voter’s first choice. Everyone could physically see what the tally was for each contestant. (We also kept a tally on a whiteboard.) So as not to single out contestants, in the rest of this article we’ll be using the names of the songs instead of those of the singers. 

In the first round, the song with the most votes was “A Big Yellow Taxi” – with seven – and here’s where it becomes very clear how ranked choice voting is superior to winner-take-all. And in this article we won’t even go into how as a structural matter winner-take-all elections bring with them the vote-splitting and gerrymandering blights.

Winner-Take-All Elections Misrepresent the Views of the Voters

If we had been conducting a winner-take-all election, “A Big Yellow Taxi” would have won right then and there – with less than a quarter of the vote! That song would have won when three-quarters of the voters had expressed preferences for other songs.

Here’s another aspect. Suppose the election had been one of Washington’s top two primaries. The number two song in the first round received six votes, so the top two between them had 13, and these two candidates – with less than 40 percent of the total vote – would be the ones that the voters got to choose between in November. 

[The Details of the Tabulation of the song voting rounds can be found below this article under Attached Files.]

This doesn’t sound like representative government to me!

Incidentally, it was that number two song that pulled through in the next to last round and won.  

If you want to find out more about ranked choice voting,

  • go to www.fairvote.org or www.fairvotewa.org. Both websites are full of useful information.
  • register for a one-hour FairVote Washington Zoom session on “Why RCV Works” by going here. It’s conducted by Bellingham’s own Kit Muehlman. There is plenty of time for questions and discussion.

To get involved, 

Downtown Bellingham Art Walk

Friday, October 1

6:00 PM – 8:00 PM

Corner of Holly and Cornwall

Please let us know you are coming, so we can organize the necessary supplies.

Attached Files

About Stoney Bird

Citizen Journalist • Member since Mar 15, 2012

Comments by Readers

Jon Humphrey

Oct 06, 2021

Yes, this is a fantastic idea that should have always been the system that we used. It is definately the system we need going forward. It is necessary for a democracy. I remember for the brief time that I lived in the mid-west that people always classified us as a “red state” but almost everyone I worked with was more “blue” or more accurately “purple.” Most voters simply don’t align with either major party on every item. In fact, they’re not even close. So all voters end up choosing a candidate they don’t really like.

Besides, as far as I can tell right now we only have 2 parties anyway that could easily be argued to be 1. The super constant consumption anti-environment perpetual warfare pro-business party and the super constant consumption anti-environment perpetual warfare bat-shit crazy pro-business party. In essence, for most voters, our system has degraded into 1 party. Take broadband for example. Public broadband is well supported by voters. 3 out of 3 PUD commissioners support it. Some were elected because of their stance on it. Yet the PUD, Port, and COB all fold to special interests and let corrupt staff push them around in the end at the expense of voters. So, from a functional standpoint, both parties accomplish nothing for most voters, even during a pandemic when the need is obvious. 

Read More...
To comment, Log In or Register

Ranked Choice Voting Always Beats Winner-Take-All

By Stoney BirdOn Sep 29, 2021

Voting on a karaoke song contest offers an opportunity for a clear view of Ranked Choice Voting

1 comment, most recent 1 week ago

What’s the BAG Been Up To?

By Jon HumphreyOn Sep 24, 2021

Under Eric Johnston, they’ve been stalling, dragging it out, and protecting big telecom.

Council Public Comment Period Of September 21st Now Belongs To The Ages

By Dick ConoboyOn Sep 21, 2021

The first iteration of public comments, separated from City Council meetings, went off in relative calm.

9 comments, most recent 2 weeks ago

Douglas Ave. Trail vs. the American Disability Act

By Elisabeth BrittOn Sep 11, 2021

Despite ADA requirements, proposed trail has no provisions for people with disabilities.

3 comments, most recent 1 month ago

City Throws Down the Gauntlet

By Tip JohnsonOn Aug 09, 2021

But ever so s_l_o_w_l_y

2 comments, most recent 2 months ago

YouTube’s Subversion Of The Bellingham City Council

By Dick ConoboyOn Aug 04, 2021

Playing along with YouTube is a losing game for Bellingham. It is time to break the ties that bind … and blind.

5 comments, most recent 2 months ago

The Monumentally Moronic Mindlessness Of YouTube

By Dick ConoboyOn Jul 24, 2021

It is time for Bellingham City Hall to take control by dumping YouTube for having taken down a video of a City Council meeting.

8 comments, most recent 2 months ago

City Hall is Third World

By John ServaisOn Jul 13, 2021

Bellingham website goes dead with one person taking a few days off. So much for an administration and a system. Third world government.

4 comments, most recent 3 months ago

Aliens Return Fairhaven’s Mail Collection Box

By Dick ConoboyOn Jul 07, 2021

Bellingham continues to have its mail dropoff options changed willy-nilly.

3 comments, most recent 2 months ago

Aliens Abduct Bellingham Mail Collection Box

By Dick ConoboyOn Jun 26, 2021

Mail collection boxes seem to be a thing of the past. Why have one postal vehicle collect from the boxes when hundreds of people can drive to the post office to mail a letter?

3 comments, most recent 3 months ago

Bellingham Council Starts Process to Abolish Municipal Court

By John ServaisOn Jun 21, 2021

Tonight the Bellingham City Council - with no agenda notice - authorized the mayor to begin process to abolish the Bellingham Municipal Court

4 comments, most recent 3 months ago

Bellingham Municipal Court Judge Lev Sues the City

By John ServaisOn May 28, 2021

Debra Lev, Bellingham’s municipal court judge, is suing Mayor Seth Fleetwood and the city

7 comments, most recent 4 months ago

WAVEing at Problems on the BAG

By Jon HumphreyOn May 11, 2021

BAG - the Bellingham city hall Broadband Advisory Group is stacked in favor of mega corporations and against local public Internet service.

12 comments, most recent 3 months ago

Boulevard Park And Infrastructure: Another COB Missed Opportunity

By Jon HumphreyOn Apr 05, 2021

Broken promises, bad administration, and still NO access to our publicly-owned resources

4 comments, most recent 6 months ago

COB: Go Ahead, Discuss All You Want…

By Jon HumphreyOn Mar 23, 2021

The advantage of an “advisory” group, (as in Broadband Advisory Group,) is that you don’t have to listen to them.

3 comments, most recent 6 months ago

The Reality Of Zoom And Citizen Participation

By Dick ConoboyOn Feb 21, 2021

City council and planning commission meetings were poor arrangements to begin with, and with Zoom it is very much worse.

4 comments, most recent 4 months ago

COB Puts The BAG In A Box

By Jon HumphreyOn Feb 07, 2021

The city has instituted unnecessary restrictions on the Broadband Advisory Group’s discussion and outside input.

3 comments, most recent 8 months ago

City Hall Clutches its Pearls

By John ServaisOn Jan 26, 2021

Mayor Fleetwood and outgoing council members could not handle the truth at last night’s Bellingham City Council meeting. Homeless people and their advocates spoke truth to power.

25 comments, most recent 8 months ago

New Public Banking Bill Introduced in Olympia - Hearing On January 28th

By Dick ConoboyOn Jan 21, 2021

A public bank in Washington is sorely needed for infrastructure projects and more especially with COVID-19 and the resultant severe economic downturn.

5 comments, most recent 8 months ago