Whatcom Co.: Voting and Vote-Counting with IntegrityPermalink +
Sun, Nov 08, 2015, 9:25 pm // Guest writer
This guest article is a group effort of the 15-year-old non-partisan "Whatcom Fair Voting" group. Comments to the article can be addressed to Marian Beddill.
- - - -
Trustworthy elections require a voting system with solid integrity, protected from tampering or corruption of the tallies of votes cast. This review does not deal with WHO can cast a ballot (registration issues, etc.) – which is a valid concern. This analysis starts at the point where a paper ballot is received in the elections system from a drop-box or postal delivery to the auditor’s office. Whatcom County in Washington state has a vote counting system that meets a strongly procedural, high integrity standard of checks and balances.
We have official “observers,” usually representing the political parties and other distinct interest groups like the League of Women Voters, but anyone may take a brief training by the elections staff, sign an oath to do the task, and be permitted to “observe.” These observers are allowed in the rooms where any of the ballot and vote management activities are taking place. They are not allowed to touch any materials and may only ask questions of a supervisor.
The general sequential process begins when the ballots are mailed to voters. The voter marks their paper ballot with an inked line in the read-area for their intended votes, puts it into the secrecy envelope, and puts the secrecy envelope containing the ballot into a slightly larger outer envelope. The voter signs his or her name on the back flap of the outer envelope. They then either mail the ballot or deposit it in a drop-box at one of the locations established and advertised by the auditor’s office.
Two staff members from the auditor’s office regularly gather the envelopes containing the ballots from the official drop-boxes and the U.S. Post Office. Once in the office, they are placed in random batches of about a hundred ballots and each batch is put into a large plastic tray. Each tray has a unique identification number that is noted on a log-sheet created for each batch. The trays and ballots - pictured above - are then stored in a safe.
The auditor’s office has a database with a copy of every voter’s signature. Before the ballots are removed from their return-envelopes, they are processed by people trained to compare the signature on the still-sealed outer envelope against the signature on record. For the purposes of this discussion of integrity, we now know that the signature has been visually verified and declared to be from a registered voter. This is registered in the database so only one ballot from that voter will be processed.
In order to process the ballots, they need to be removed from the outer and secrecy envelopes and separated. At this point, the ballot cannot be identified as to which voter cast it.
To pre-determine that the ballots are readable by the scanners, every ballot is visually inspected and reviewed by staffers. Any marks other than a proper vote requires the ballot to be duplicated by two staff members, one marking, the other checking. Log sheets are kept and signed by both staff members, and the voter-marked ballots are moved to a different storage place. Both log-sheets are numbered for cross-referencing so at any time the voter-marked ballots may be retrieved for verification.
Washington state law requires effort be made to count the vote according to “voter intent,” and there are 24 different “voter intent” scenarios which are recognized as guides for the staff. So, there is an initial visual inspection of every ballot and where irregular marks are seen, the ballot is duplicated following that guide. In instances where a voter’s intent cannot be determined, a duplicate ballot is made, leaving out that item. The same will happen if the computer-scanner spots an irregularity – the ballot is removed and a duplicate made and re-inserted in the process.
BATCHES of BALLOTS
Ballots and their digital twins are handled and stored in “batches,” arbitrary bunches of about 100 ballots placed and managed together. Several batches may be placed in a storage box and a unique number is assigned to each batch and box. All activities for managing the ballots are registered in a logging-system. If ballots are withdrawn from a batch for some kind of verification, they are re-registered in a new batch and the record of the batch they were taken from is edited to show the reduced count. Every movement is checked by staff and a supervisor, and signed by each. The boxed batches are kept in a secured room except when being processed.
SECURITY of the COMPUTERS
Ah! The processing!
The computer system is in a locked and secure room. The industrial-quality, high-speed scanners make and save a digital copy of the votes that were marked on the paper ballot by the voter. They are directly connected to the processing computers, and it takes only seconds to read a batch.
At predetermined and announced times, so that observers may be present, the ballots in batches are ‘read’ into the computer system by a high-speed scanner, one batch at a time. The batch numbers are registered on the log sheets of each scanner. (see scanner photo below article)
For security, the scanners and computers that read the ballots, count the votes and store that information, have NO communication connection to the outside world. Data cannot be sent directly to or from these computers and they have features that would block any attempt to send/receive information through electric power lines. Programs are loaded onto the computers from certified copies on digital media.
All vote-total digital output from these computers is transferred out ONLY by manual transport of a removable external disc drive. The data is copied onto such a disc, which is carried by two people, for integrity, to an administrative room to be incorporated into the permanent storage systems. It’s called a “sneaker-net,” referring to their shoes. For verification, those vote totals are also printed in both locations, the computer room before they go out and again in the administrative office, so there can be a double-check. Then the results will be made ready to go public. But wait; there is another step!
AUDITS and OBSERVERS
The computerized results are subjected to a final inspection - a manual double-check/mini-audit.
A prime function of the observers is to randomly select batches for integrity verification. While the paper-ballot batches are being scan-read by the computer system, the observers designate random batches to be verified by a hand-count. Those batches are sealed in special boxes, tagged, registered, and stored in a separate place. The double-check hand-count usually takes place the following morning and any observers may be present.
The randomly selected batches of paper ballots are taken to a room, opened by staff and selected races are hand-counted; they are counted a second time by another team. If the two hand counts agree, the computerized counts, which were printed but not disclosed, are announced for the first time. This basic, independent double check allows everyone to know whether the computer-count numbers match the hand-counts – or are different.
If the vote-tally numbers differ between the computer-count and the hand-count, an investigation is started right then, in the same room. The paper ballots are scrutinized for any irregularity that may have been understood one way by the computer system and another way by the staff. The most common reason for a difference has been that a pen-mark by the voter on a paper ballot wasn’t dark enough – which led the staff to see it as “a vote,” but the more-sensitive computer-system to call it “a non-vote – a blank.”
When managers and staff find such a ballot, it is removed from the batch. Once a substitute ballot has been duplicated to coincide with the presumed voter-intent, it will be re-inserted into the batch. That “repaired” batch is then again run through the scanner/computer system, and the new results are brought to the review team while public observers are still there. Over about a dozen years, almost without exception, the computer tally including the properly marked vote has matched the hand count first found by the verify-staff. No errors, and no corruption.
The batches of paper ballots are then archived, under a management system of coded identification of each batch.
COMPUTERS and SOFTWARE
Computer software is a fundamental part of the system and the programs could be subject to corruption. Federal and state law requires that all such systems be reviewed and certified as reliable and free of features that could corrupt the reported vote-tallies. Our system in Whatcom County met that certification requirement when it was purchased.
But all such systems are subject to eventual failure so there must be new, certified management programs to replace them. We believe any new equipment, both hardware and software, MUST be carefully reviewed and found reliable – i.e. certified.
Unfortunately, the federal office tasked with doing this certification had nearly drifted out of existence. It has recently been re-activated and new programs are now beginning to obtain federal certification. Hopefully, they will be available to states and counties in the near future.
But Washington state’s certification process is still idle. The public needs to push to re-start our efforts to adequately review new computer systems. Producing Certification Reports on them will allow us to begin acquiring them. Certification MUST be done before our “old” systems begin to fail, which some experts suggest will be within the next three years.
INSIST on HAND COUNTABLE PAPER BALLOTS
In order to retain the integrity of our voting system, votes must be delivered to the elections office marked on paper ballots by the voters. We currently have the ability to use those paper ballots to do hand-counts to double-check the machine counts. The paper ballot is physical, thus verifiable, whereas electronic records are not. Other than a few exceptions for special cases such as military voters overseas, or voters who are blind or have other disabilities, we must say no to electronic/digital voting. No touchscreen voting. No internet voting. All those systems can be hacked and corrupted. With the process steps outlined above, we can have confidence that our votes are correctly counted and reported.
Well, yes. There are the questions of who may have a ballot and who will mark it. But those are for another report.
= = = =
This is a public education article by Whatcom Fair Voting, which has been in operation for over a decade.
Whatcom Fair Voting (WFV) is a non-partisan ad-hoc grassroots citizen’s group working to promote electoral process integrity by:
- Researching voting improvements
- Encouraging full citizen participation
- Informing the public and elected officials on voting issues
- Supporting safeguards to ensure fair & accurate voting, accountability & process transparency
- Monitoring elections legislation
Sun, Nov 08, 2015, 9:25 pm // Guest writerAn overview of Whatcom County's method of processing ballots and counting votes.
2 comments; last on Nov 14, 2015
Fri, Nov 06, 2015, 4:37 pm // John ServaisSatpal Sidhu wins council seat. Virtually all the ballots are now counted. Challenges and a few special are left.
1 comments; last on Nov 06, 2015
Thu, Nov 05, 2015, 9:17 pm // John ServaisJail sales tax is being rejected - and the NO vote is increasing. Sidhu - Kerschner still undecided. Props 2, 3, 9 and 10 all should pass.
1 comments; last on Nov 06, 2015
Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 6:45 pm // John ServaisSecond tally of 10,000 more ballots is in. Jail sales tax is now being rejected. Probably 15,000 or more ballots to go.
2 comments; last on Nov 05, 2015
Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 12:05 am // John ServaisThe first returns - probably 60% of the final vote - shows contradictory propositions passing and most candidate races decided.
7 comments; last on Nov 04, 2015
Sun, Nov 01, 2015, 9:31 am // John ServaisWhere more substantial evidence is presented against proposition 9 - and why you should vote REJECTED on it.
24 comments; last on Nov 04, 2015
Sat, Oct 31, 2015, 2:02 am // John ServaisAs an independent citizen and political junkie, here is how I am voting - with brief reasons for my choices.
8 comments; last on Nov 03, 2015
Tue, Oct 20, 2015, 9:25 am // John ServaisCounty Executive - and candidate for reelection -Jack Louws has written county officials with his regrets over jail mailer.
8 comments; last on Oct 24, 2015
Sun, Oct 18, 2015, 11:37 am // John ServaisThe jail sales tax proposition is a road to perdition for our county. It is a waste and has been deceptively promoted.
4 comments; last on Oct 20, 2015
Fri, Oct 16, 2015, 4:52 pm // Tip JohnsonWith a smarmy October Surprise
9 comments; last on Oct 19, 2015
Thu, Oct 08, 2015, 7:14 am // John LesowA Canadian radio station is trying to install huge radio towers in Point Roberts for a Canadian audience. Citizen movement has fought them.
Fri, Oct 02, 2015, 10:48 am // David CampThe "... new jail just doesn't pencil out", writes a well qualified accountant. A look at the future costs of the proposed jail.
11 comments; last on Oct 09, 2015
Tue, Sep 22, 2015, 4:54 pm // John ServaisThere is a good alternative for a decent jail - but we first must vote down the jail sales tax proposal in November.
5 comments; last on Sep 24, 2015
Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 4:11 am // Guest writerChristopher Brown guest writes how traditional communal warrior reintegration practices could help our returning combat veterans.
Wed, Aug 19, 2015, 6:55 pm // Whatcom CitizenA Whatcom Citizen writes of protest movements and how our proposed county mega jail is related to them.
15 comments; last on Sep 04, 2015
Sun, Aug 09, 2015, 10:52 am // Guest writerBarbara Perry has been researching the secretive election processes of the Whatcom Conservation District. Really secretive. Probably fraudulent.
1 comments; last on Aug 12, 2015
Tue, Aug 04, 2015, 7:09 pm // John Servais9:52 - final post for tonight. A running blog about the election results on this August evening. Feel free to comment.
8 comments; last on Aug 06, 2015
Tue, Jul 21, 2015, 11:42 pm // Guest writerEric Hirst provides us all with a well researched report on Whatcom County water issues - rights, Lake Whatcom, ground water and more.
10 comments; last on Aug 12, 2015
Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 3:13 pm // John LesowThe fight to keep Point Roberts from becoming a Radio Tower Farm is not over.
3 comments; last on Jul 22, 2015
Wed, Jul 08, 2015, 8:27 am // John ServaisLast minute political maneuvering by liberal council seeks to counter conservative review commission ballot proposals.
1 comments; last on Aug 12, 2015
Mon, Jul 06, 2015, 3:30 pm // John ServaisTwo dirty tricks by the uber-conservative minority on the Charter Review Commission aimed to put their agenda before the council.
3 comments; last on Jul 07, 2015
Thu, Jun 25, 2015, 5:00 pm // John ServaisUpdated at 6 pm. Our county justice system has spent 6 years trying to teach Luba Pekisheva that she should not defend herself. Justice denied and miscarried.
8 comments; last on Jul 22, 2015
Mon, May 18, 2015, 10:17 pm // John ServaisJoy Gilfilen is challenging incumbent Jack Louws for County Executive.
4 comments; last on May 20, 2015
Sun, Apr 26, 2015, 1:05 pm // Guest writerTani Sutley writes a second article on the increasing number of vacation rentals - and the County Council bill to let them expand dramatically.
4 comments; last on May 02, 2015
Thu, Mar 12, 2015, 12:06 pm // John ServaisAdd your thoughts and remembrances. Robyn du Pre` was a stalwart and true environmental advocate for Bellingham and Whatcom County. She died this week.
9 comments; last on Mar 23, 2015
Mon, Feb 02, 2015, 8:34 am // Guest writerNo ballot mailed to you. You must request a ballot for voting in the Whatcom Conservation District election. Deadline to apply is Feb 9. By Barbara Perry
Sun, Jan 25, 2015, 11:32 am // Guest writerAdventures of George Pickett in the Pacific Northwest Wilderness
5 comments; last on Jan 28, 2015
Tue, Jan 20, 2015, 2:07 am // Guest writerGuest article by Sandra Alfers. Water and sewer connections drive unwanted annexation. Trickle Creek homeowners are muzzled by a "no protest zone."
1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2015
Thu, Jan 08, 2015, 1:54 pm // Guest writerTani Sutley guest writes about the vacation rentals situation and presents goals for the county council to consider for improving our rural neighborhoods.
1 comments; last on Jan 10, 2015
Wed, Dec 31, 2014, 12:16 am // Guest writerDuuhhh! Try doing without it. Marian Beddill provides an overview of our rural Whatcom County water situation and the efforts to find fair solutions.
3 comments; last on Jan 08, 2015
Wed, Dec 24, 2014, 12:23 pm // Riley SweeneyThe Herald gave us their top 10 stories, Riley gives you his top 5
Thu, Dec 18, 2014, 4:04 pm // John ServaisOne part of the environmental study for the proposed Cherry Point mega coal terminal has been completed and released. It deals with ship collisions - they call it…
2 comments; last on Dec 22, 2014
Tue, Dec 09, 2014, 1:25 am // Guest writerTani Sutley writes of how unregulated vacation rentals are invading the Lake Whatcom watershed. She urges action before the Planning Commission meeting on 11 December.
4 comments; last on Jan 03, 2015
Sat, Nov 22, 2014, 2:48 pm // Riley SweeneyRiley dives into the data with precinct maps and historical perspectives
Tue, Nov 04, 2014, 11:28 am // John ServaisWhile smearing Seth Fleetwood over a common tax arrangement, we discover Doug Ericksen also has a benign tax lien - one he denied.
6 comments; last on Nov 11, 2014
Thu, Oct 30, 2014, 1:18 am // John ServaisA link to Riley's Political Junkie for excellent recommendations - and a few thoughts of my own.
1 comments; last on Oct 30, 2014
Wed, Oct 22, 2014, 1:44 pm // John LesowUpdate Oct 22: John Lesow has posted a comment with considerable more information on this issue.
1 comments; last on Oct 22, 2014
Tue, Oct 14, 2014, 5:36 am // Riley SweeneyRiley does a local political comedy show
1 comments; last on Oct 15, 2014
Thu, Oct 02, 2014, 1:33 pm // Riley SweeneyRiley files a full report of the Tea Party debate for State Leg candidates
1 comments; last on Oct 04, 2014
Tue, Sep 30, 2014, 7:00 am // Guest writerWherein a Fulbright scholar, professional engineer and successful business owner files for public office
4 comments; last on Oct 02, 2014
Thu, Aug 14, 2014, 2:13 pm // Guest writerSandy Robson guest writes of the need for real prosperity at Cherry Point, not a destructive short term coal port that destroys the fishing grounds.
5 comments; last on Oct 02, 2014
Tue, Aug 12, 2014, 9:52 am // Riley SweeneySome Context for the Primary Results
Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 10:40 am // Riley SweeneyNorthwest Citizen has conducted a phone poll of likely voters, with some surprising results!
9 comments; last on Jul 29, 2014
Mon, Jul 07, 2014, 4:04 am // Guest writerGuest writer Sandy Robson breaks the story of officials from Washington treated to a coal-promoting junket to Wyoming.
2 comments; last on Jul 13, 2014
Fri, Jul 04, 2014, 4:00 am // Guest writerFerndale's most famous landmark is frequently commented on and is often in the news. Here is their side of the story.
4 comments; last on Jul 07, 2014
Wed, Jun 11, 2014, 10:39 am // John ServaisWyoming Senators and coal honchos were in Whatcom County June 10 - to hold a news conference with select reporters.
7 comments; last on Jun 20, 2014
Wed, May 28, 2014, 2:15 pm // Guest writerA perspective by guest writer Ellen Murphy reflects on the Whatcom Watch and the threatened law suit by Craig Cole.
22 comments; last on Jun 01, 2014
Wed, May 21, 2014, 11:10 pm // Guest writerWyoming is ready to try and legally force us to limit our environmental scoping for the Cherry Point coal terminal
4 comments; last on Jun 17, 2014
Sat, May 17, 2014, 1:34 pm // Riley SweeneyRiley takes a closer look at the Charter Review Commission candidates
2 comments; last on May 21, 2014
Sun, May 11, 2014, 1:20 pm // Terry WechslerPart 1: Introduction to the Bellingham Basin’s Potential for Fracking, Earthquakes, and Earthquakes Due to Fracking
3 comments; last on May 14, 2014
Fri, May 09, 2014, 9:02 am // John ServaisThe Political Junkie for Whatcom County - that would be Riley Sweeney - has Overstreet not running for reelection in the 42nd.
1 comments; last on May 13, 2014
Tue, May 06, 2014, 4:52 pm // Riley SweeneyThe value of a Precinct Committee Officer . . .
1 comments; last on May 07, 2014
Thu, May 01, 2014, 9:21 pm // Guest writerMove to Amend is a national movement to amend the U.S. Constitution and define persons as people and speech as not money.
7 comments; last on Jun 02, 2014
Wed, Apr 30, 2014, 7:20 am // John ServaisRiley posted this morning that Seth Fleetwood has decided to challenge Doug Ericksen for state senate in the 42nd District.
1 comments; last on Apr 30, 2014
Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 12:59 pm // Terry WechslerA closer look at Whatcom County's industrial "stewards of the environment."
4 comments; last on Aug 28, 2014
Sat, Apr 19, 2014, 1:57 pm // Terry Wechsleror How Not to Plan for Future Generations' Water Needs
12 comments; last on Jun 30, 2014
Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 9:40 am // Riley SweeneyA simple explanation of the Charter Review and analysis of District only voting
Wed, Mar 19, 2014, 9:32 am // Riley SweeneyRiley digs into the county's plan to buy the county morgue
3 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014
Fri, Mar 14, 2014, 9:47 am // John ServaisFukushima radiation has been found 20 miles from Whatcom County farmland along the Fraser River in British Columbia.
1 comments; last on Mar 17, 2014
Mon, Mar 10, 2014, 9:51 am // Riley SweeneyRiley digs into an unusual hiring decision at the County Planning Dept
1 comments; last on Mar 10, 2014
Election InfoAuditor Election page
State Results - Nov 3
Whatcom Results - Nov 3
Coal, Oil & TrainsCoal Stop
Community Wise Bham
Powder River Basin R. C.
Local Blogs & NewsBellingham Herald
Bham Business Journal
Bham Politics & Econ
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
League of Women Voters
Western Front - WWU
Local CausesChuckanut C. Forest
City Club of Bellingham
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice
Governments- Whatcom County
Port of Bellingham
State Results - Nov 3
US Supreme Court
US The White House
NWCitizen 1995-2007Early Northwest Citizen
Weather & ClimateCliff Mass Weather Blog
Nat Hurricane Center
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That?
Edge of Sports
Famous Internet Skiers
Good Web SitesAl-Jazeera online
Change The Mascot
Foreign Policy in Focus
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Middle East Times
New American Century
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Project Vote Smart
Stand for the Troops
Talking Points Memo
The Crisis Papers
War and Piece
Quiet, Offline or DeadBellingham Register
Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Intrnational Herald Tribune
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph