Effort to Stop Bakken Oil Trains

Permalink +

Sat, Oct 24, 2015, 1:26 pm  //  John Servais

Large Great Blue Heron colony near March Point is threatened by oil train expansions. Photo with permission of Lance Ekhart Photography.

Some Whatcom County environmental folks want to help our neighbors in Skagit County fight the expansion of rail traffic to the Shell refinery near Anacortes.  Due to early action on the part of Skagit citizens, the huge refinery complex on March Point has been forced into an environmental review of its proposed rail yards.  This is similar to the expansion that was allowed without any EIS at Whatcom County refineries.  

On this coming Wednesday evening, Oct 28, at 7:30 p.m. group organizer, Claudia DeWees, will host a meeting and slideshow at the RE Sources community room on the corner of Broadway and Meridian. All are welcome.  In the words of the group's notice, "Fact sheets and comment cards will be provided. You can make a comment on the spot. Public comments submitted during the scoping process will widen the investigation of this threat but there is not much time. The comment process ends Nov. 5th."

The Washington Department of Ecology is taking comments on the environmental review up to November 5.

The concern is not only the increased train traffic but also the destruction of the Padilla Bay area if one of these 110-car trains derails and either spills oil into the bay, or even worse, explodes as have other Bakken oil trains.  The largest heron colony in Washington state is located 619 feet from the railroad tracks, on March Point.  An explosion would wipe it out.  There are also sensitive shellfish grounds in Padilla Bay which could be wiped out from even an oil spill.  Shell plans to bring 5 or 6 trains a week over the Padilla Bay causeway and past the heron colony. 

The oil industry, the railroad industry and the federal government have all shown themselves to be very slow at making safety improvements while very good at pointing the finger to each other and even their investors in railroad tank cars as being responsible for derailments, oil spills and explosions.  Thus, the serious concern of citizens and the effort to push the Department of Ecology into either prohibiting the rail yard expansion or imposing serious and effective safeguards.  

For the past several decades, most crude oil has not come by rail.  With the development of the Bakken oil fields in North Dakota through fracking, there is a push to bring this oil across the mountains and up the coast to Skagit and Whatcom county refineries.  



David Camp  //  Sat, Oct 24, 2015, 7:08 pm

Pipelines are safer than trains to transport oil. However, the Bakken is a short play - too short to justify a pipeline UNLESS there is a longer play hooked in with it. This is why the Keystone XL makes economic sense - it combines short play Bakken oil with long play tar sands oil, spreading costs out over a longer period and thus yielding a better payback.

However, isn’t rail preferable to ship, which is how the rest of the oil arrives at Anacortes? A spill at sea is both larger and more catastrophic than a spill of a car or two on land. Of course an explosion like in Megantic was more catastrophic again but I think this is what we’re talking about - mitigating explosion risk to the max, because unless we radically change our oil-burning ways as Americans, the demand will continue, and the trains are inevitable. I repeat, inevitable, since a pipeline is not economic.

Sad reality. We have to quit burning oil but how do we get there?

John Servais  //  Sat, Oct 24, 2015, 8:45 pm

Wow, David.  Perhaps a slightly different perspective might have value here.  The issue is not whether we should transport oil - as your comment suggests the issue is. It is not a question of us being responsible for transport disasters because we use oil.  Rather the issue is how to transport oil so as not to cause destruction and death along the shipping route.  Whether by ship, pipe or train the issue is the same.  So the question then becomes - can oil be transported safely?  And the answer seems to be yes - but it cuts into the profits of the mega multi national corporations and so it is not done. 

Can we transport safely?  Yes.  And so we have the efforts of the Skagit folks.  The railroads - BNSF in this case - do not want to run a totally safe railroad.  Cost benefit advantage is not with running a railroad safely.  Costs of fines and cleanup are obviously less than building and maintaining a safe rail transport system.  How can we conclude that?  Because if safety provided a lower cost system then the railroads would go that way.  Really. They don’t want to hurt anyone or destroy Padilla Bay for the next hundred years.  But their fines for doing so are much less than building a safe rail route, having shorter trains than 110 tank cars, and less than switching to really safe tank cars. We can go on.  There is slower trains, better track maintenance, better maintenance of the tank cars, shorter hours for the engineers, more pay for the engineers, more automatic rail safety devices, etc. 

Yes, we can ship oil so as to not endanger Padilla Bay, to not risk driving the herons from their nesting trees, to not pollute our streams and not endanger our towns.  But the railroads - BNSF - does not want to do that because it cuts into profits. And it sure seems like our state and federal agencies are most reluctant to make them run their railroads in a safe manner.  We can think that because of the poor record of train safety since the 1840s right up to today.  Railroads write the railroad laws in this country. 

Safety, David.  Safe transportation of dangerous cargoes. It can be done.  And that is the issue.

David Camp  //  Sun, Oct 25, 2015, 3:54 pm

Actually John the real issue is how long we can continue to burn the stuff and pretend it’s not harming the living systems of the planet. Being concerned about transport safety of oil and ignoring the bigger issue is rather like an alcoholic agonizing over a indigestion while ignoring his drink-caused cirrhosis of the liver.

John Servais  //  Sun, Oct 25, 2015, 5:17 pm

The issue of this post revolves around the meeting on Wednesday and the concerns about oil trains coming into the Shell refinery at March Point in Skagit County. 

David, I can take you up a step and tell you that oil is only one issue harming the planet and people.  We can get pretty metaphysical in a few more comments.  But this modest gathering on this coming Wednesday evening is not to discuss the future of clean energy.  Such lofty concepts are nice.  These folks just want to preserve the heron colony until the day the oil trains are no longer needed and no longer a threat to the heron colony.  Oh, and no longer a threat to Padilla Bay, the towns in Skagit County and the people living there. 

Reminds me of when I was in college and minoring in philosophy.  It suddenly all became so absurd.  So I switched the minor to geology.  Wacking hard rock was so much more based on reality than advanced concepts of ethics.  We can get pretty far out there theorizing when all we need to do is take out the garbage.  Lets have safe oil trains for as long or short a time as they are running.

Doug Karlberg  //  Sun, Oct 25, 2015, 8:19 pm

John, and guests. I have one suggestion, but I do not have time for te meetings. Maybe one of you can mention this, if someone has not already caught it.

The rail bridge over the Swinomish slough is decrepit. When the train crosses it block most boat traffic over the slough. In the last ten years or so, after the train passes it has jammed, and long boat traffic blockages result. Workers with iron bars literally have to come a jimmy the bridge loose.

When I have been delayed I have a had the opportunity to survey the bridge in great detail, and this bridge, in my less than expert judgement is very old, and long past its safe useful life.

John Servais  //  Sun, Oct 25, 2015, 8:49 pm

Doug, your experience is practical and of value.  In writing this post I almost mentioned the bridge because it has appeared to me to be an ancient relic.  It would be interesting to have state or federal inspectors go on the record as to the fitness of this bridge.  Me thinks they will be reluctant to declare it in fit shape for 110 car oil trains.  Your suggestion is spot on, imo.

Scary fact is the bridge is being used now for Bakken oil trains servicing the Tesoro refinery, neighboring the Shell refinery on the north end of March Point.  Of our 4 refineries in two counties, three are already fully outfitted with new special tracks and yards for off loading the Bakken oil.  Our state Department of Ecology has quietly allowed them to do as they pleased without studies of any substance.  The Shell refinery is our last chance to bring out the safety issues on these new oil trains.

Effort to Stop Bakken Oil Trains

Whatcom group plans meeting workshop to submit comments to Washington Dept of Ecology against Skagit/Bakken oil trains.

John Servais
Sat, Oct 24, 2015, 1:26 pm
6 comments; last on Oct 26, 2015

Coal Ship Collisions Study Is Released

One part of the environmental study for the proposed Cherry Point mega coal terminal has been completed and released. It deals with ship collisions - they call it…

John Servais
Thu, Dec 18, 2014, 4:04 pm
2 comments; last on Dec 22, 2014

Reliable Prosperity

Sandy Robson guest writes of the need for real prosperity at Cherry Point, not a destructive short term coal port that destroys the fishing grounds.

Guest writer
Thu, Aug 14, 2014, 2:13 pm
5 comments; last on Oct 02, 2014

Manifest Clandestine-y

Guest writer Sandy Robson breaks the story of officials from Washington treated to a coal-promoting junket to Wyoming.

Guest writer
Mon, Jul 07, 2014, 4:04 am
2 comments; last on Jul 14, 2014

Sins of Omission

In the Weekly, Tim Johnson left out three words in quoting Craig Cole - and his story misleads readers. Guest article by Sandy Robson.

Guest writer
Fri, Jun 27, 2014, 8:01 pm
11 comments; last on Jul 01, 2014

Herald and Weekly Withhold the News

Wyoming Senators and coal honchos were in Whatcom County June 10 - to hold a news conference with select reporters.

John Servais
Wed, Jun 11, 2014, 10:39 am
7 comments; last on Jun 20, 2014

The Road to Perdition

A Venn diagram where coal, the Endangered Species Act, Republicans, and Wyoming’s Board of Education collide.

Guest writer
Sat, May 31, 2014, 11:39 pm
2 comments; last on Jun 03, 2014

Feint, Calumny, Solidarity

A perspective by guest writer Ellen Murphy reflects on the Whatcom Watch and the threatened law suit by Craig Cole.

Guest writer
Wed, May 28, 2014, 2:15 pm
22 comments; last on Jun 02, 2014

Montana & Wyoming to WA: Permit Coal Export Terminals… Or Else

Wyoming is ready to try and legally force us to limit our environmental scoping for the Cherry Point coal terminal

Guest writer
Wed, May 21, 2014, 11:10 pm
4 comments; last on Jun 17, 2014

An Imminent Threat

Why Washington must step in and assume lead agency status in Skagit County for the Shell crude by rail proposal.

Terry Wechsler
Fri, May 09, 2014, 5:10 am
6 comments; last on Jun 22, 2014

“Friends and Neighbors”?

A closer look at Whatcom County's industrial "stewards of the environment."

Terry Wechsler
Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 12:59 pm
4 comments; last on Aug 28, 2014

Killer Industrial Jobs or Long-term Job Killers?

Why commenting on the EIS for Comp Plan revisions for Cherry Point means demanding an EIS in the first place.

Terry Wechsler
Sun, Apr 06, 2014, 11:52 am
5 comments; last on Jun 25, 2014

County Hires GPT Permit Lead as Senior Planner

Riley digs into an unusual hiring decision at the County Planning Dept

Riley Sweeney
Mon, Mar 10, 2014, 9:51 am
1 comments; last on Mar 10, 2014

Whatcom Watch Editor Resigns

The editor of the Whatcom Watch, Richard Jehn, has resigned effective today. Chalk up a victory for Craig Cole and Pacific International Terminals.

John Servais
Sun, Mar 02, 2014, 2:22 pm
8 comments; last on Mar 06, 2014

Relevant Documents to Libel Threat

The full text of Craig Cole's threatening letter of libel against the Whatcom Watch. And the emptiness of the threat.

John Servais
Tue, Feb 25, 2014, 8:29 pm
16 comments; last on Mar 21, 2014

Craig Cole Threatens Libel Suit

Craig Cole, the local contact for the proposed Cherry Point coal port has threatened the Whatcom Watch with a libel lawsuit.

John Servais
Wed, Feb 19, 2014, 4:48 pm
6 comments; last on Mar 21, 2014

How the Coal Industry Funneled $40,000 into Whatcom

Riley uncovers how the Coal Industry is funding conservative candidates in Whatcom County

Riley Sweeney
Wed, Oct 02, 2013, 5:40 am
11 comments; last on Oct 03, 2013

Safeguard the Southfork

Jeffrey Margolis urges us to request the Nooksack South Fork Valley be included in the Coal Port environmental study.

Guest writer
Thu, May 30, 2013, 11:01 pm
3 comments; last on Jun 02, 2013

Coal Trains and Unhealthy Air - Any Connection?

Help fund a scientific study looking for links between diesel locomotives, coal trains and unhealthy air.

John Servais
Sun, May 05, 2013, 2:45 pm

EIS Scoping Period for GPT is Closed

Links to a few noteworthy GPT scoping comments .

Wendy Harris
Tue, Jan 22, 2013, 6:19 pm
1 comments; last on Jan 23, 2013

Video of Mudslide Derailing Train Monday

A dramatic video of yet another mudslide near Everett - and what will be coming down on coal trains. Amtrak service to Bellingham is shut down.

John Servais
Wed, Dec 19, 2012, 11:12 am
4 comments; last on Dec 20, 2012

Coal Ship Wrecks Vancouver Terminal

A giant coal freighter went right through the long dock early Friday morning. Nothing in print edition of Herald

John Servais
Sat, Dec 08, 2012, 1:43 pm
3 comments; last on Dec 11, 2012

Lummi Nation Opposes Coal Terminal

Bellingham Business Journal breaking story - Lummi's to hold meeting today at noon to speak against the Cherry Point project.

John Servais
Fri, Sep 21, 2012, 8:53 am
7 comments; last on Nov 04, 2012

The Political Junkie interviews “Power Past Coal”

Riley sits down with Matt Petryni with Power Past Coal to get the latest scoop

Riley Sweeney
Mon, Aug 20, 2012, 8:00 am

Coal Free Bellingham: Point Proven?

Questions raised by the Superior Court's barring of the Bellingham Community Bill of Rights initiative from being placed on the ballot.

Larry Horowitz
Thu, Aug 09, 2012, 8:30 pm
21 comments; last on Aug 17, 2012

BNSF Shoreline Improvements for the Proposed Gateway Pacific Coal Port

Wherein we see the Railroad walking it's walk while we get ready to talk our talk.

Tip Johnson
Sun, Jul 15, 2012, 12:54 am
1 comments; last on Jul 16, 2012

Planning Commissioner Mocks Environmental Concern For Coal Terminal

Planning Commissioner Onkels should recuse himself from review of environmental impacts at GPT.

Wendy Harris
Sun, Jan 15, 2012, 12:06 am
3 comments; last on Feb 09, 2012

The Cole Train: Loads of BS

Wherein the sooty prospect of economic necessity rears its ugly head

Tip Johnson
Sun, Dec 04, 2011, 5:53 pm
2 comments; last on Dec 05, 2011

Update on Cherry Point Buffer Mitigation Proposal

Planning Staff's recommended revision will not prevent SSA from reducing wetland buffers.

Wendy Harris
Fri, Dec 02, 2011, 2:08 pm

County Proposal Includes New Cherry Point Buffer Mitigation Requirements

The County's new mitigation proposal is unlikely to be adequate for Cherry Point's industrial impacts to habitat buffers

Wendy Harris
Tue, Nov 22, 2011, 10:29 pm
3 comments; last on Nov 24, 2011

Cameras, not coal, decided the election

Looking at the numbers for the Bellingham elections

Paul deArmond
Sat, Nov 19, 2011, 9:24 pm
11 comments; last on Nov 23, 2011

Bad Idea, Wrong Place, and Wrong Time

Bob Ferris of Re-Sources takes a values based perspective on our community and a possible coal port.

Guest writer
Mon, Oct 31, 2011, 3:07 pm
9 comments; last on Nov 02, 2011

From the Political Junkie: Why is Dan Pike talking about Coal Trains?

Look at the title, it spells it out.

Riley Sweeney
Thu, Sep 08, 2011, 9:37 am
6 comments; last on Sep 13, 2011

“Coal on a Roll” - in depth from onearth.org

George Black is comprehensive on the Powder River coal basin, BNSF, and the shipping of coal from Cherry Point and Longview.

John Servais
Thu, Sep 01, 2011, 2:46 pm
6 comments; last on Sep 07, 2011

SSA already started construction at Cherry Point

The Gateway Pacific coal port appears to be under construction now - secretly and w/o permits.

John Servais
Fri, Jul 29, 2011, 10:11 am
36 comments; last on Aug 05, 2011

The Cole Train: Tell it to the Herring

Wherein something smells a bit fishy

Tip Johnson
Mon, Jun 20, 2011, 10:42 am
2 comments; last on Jul 29, 2011

On the Take - Coal Port advocates

Who all is on the take? Who all has not been up front about being on the take for the Coal Port?

John Servais
Wed, Jun 08, 2011, 1:09 pm
4 comments; last on Jun 12, 2011

Running blog on Coal Port

A running update of links and info on the Coal Port and Trains of proposed Gateway Pacific at Cherry Point.

John Servais
Fri, Jun 03, 2011, 11:56 am
15 comments; last on Jun 30, 2011

Dave Warren plays the martyr

The public meeting to hear opinions about the coal port last night saw local union leader Dave Warren playing games.

John Servais
Thu, Jun 02, 2011, 6:45 pm
3 comments; last on Jun 05, 2011

Flash mob for coal meeting

Guest writer Mark Flanders' call to action for June 1 flash mob at coal port meeting

Guest writer
Wed, Jun 01, 2011, 4:32 pm
7 comments; last on Jun 10, 2011

The Cole Train: First Salvo

Wherein blackened hearts and minds are initially examined

Tip Johnson
Mon, May 30, 2011, 10:40 pm
6 comments; last on Jun 02, 2011

Cross-County Coal Train is Coming

Coal trains will probably pass Lynden on their way from Sumas to Cherry Point, after coming across on the Canadian rail roads.

John Servais
Fri, Mar 25, 2011, 4:00 am
16 comments; last on Aug 14, 2011


About NWCitizen

Donate to help support

Our writers
Thru the years

League of Women Voters

Feb 25 - Up voter turnout

Local Online News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Business Journal
Bham Politics & Econ
Cascadia Weekly
Coal Stop
Ferndale Record
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
Noisy Waters
Northern Light
Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut C. Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Powder River Basin R. C.
RE Sources
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice

Our Governments

- Whatcom County

Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US House
US Senate
US Supreme Court
US The White House
WA State
Whatcom COG

NWCitizen 1995-2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
EPIC World Photos
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That?

Local Leisure

Adventures NW

Bellingham Wins
Entertainment NNW
Recreation Northwest

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Change The Mascot
Common Dreams
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Drudge Report
Edge of Sports
Foreign Policy in Focus
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Huffington Post
Innocence Project
Irish Times
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Sea Shepherd
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
War and Piece
Washington Votes

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register

Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Jack Petree
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Protect Bellingham Parks
Sweeney Politics
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders