Water, Water Everywhere, but ...

Permalink +

Sat, Apr 19, 2014, 1:57 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

Kudos to Rome Grange and the local Citizens' Alliance for Property Rights (yes, I am saying kudos) for the excellent Water Forum today at the public library. The panel included representatives of the Whatcom County Council, COB, PUD, ECOL, and ag.

It was a longish format, but that allowed each panelist to speak for at least 10 minutes, with an hour remaining for questions. Panelists were asked to respond to specific questions, including 1) identifying key issues, and 2) weighing in on the county council's water action plan. This is just the briefest takeaway of the conference.

Panelists generally agreed with Carl Weimer's prioritization of the issues:

  • lack of sustainable salmon fisheries
  • bacterial pollution of surface waters, particularly in Portage Bay
  • stormwater runoff
  • phosphorus levels in Lake Whatcom (must be reduced 87%)
  • groundwater pollution, particularly nitrates in the Sumas/Abbotsford/Blaine aquifer
  • sorting out water rights and clarifying the issue of whether exempt wells are an "additional water withdrawal" and
  • flood drainage

No one thought the council's water action plan was a bad idea. Carl, its author, thought it was particularly brilliant. With 300 or so pendiing approaches to addressing our issues, prioritization is key so we can resolve to do the most important things, and then fund the doing, according to Carl.

Putting the pieces together, a gross generalization of the main takeaway would be:

  1. we have plenty of water, yet we have major contstraints in the northern part of the county due to the level of nitrate pollution in the aquifir;
  2. ag has caused 92% of the pollution in the aquifir, with Canada contributing to the problem in a "band" along the border, but south of that, it is "on us;"
  3. the most appropriate solution would be to a) stop polluting the aquifer and get the Canadians to do the same, and b) develop treatment systems adequate to address the pollution;
  4. the cheapest, most expedient way to address ag's immediate need for water is for them to gain rights to somebody else's water, with the middle fork of the Nooksack being the most obvious place because Bellingham, in particular, has a large quantity of rights not currently being used (and not subject to "use it or lose it");
  5. the feds are in the process of quantifying tribal rights to minimum instream flow and once they do, all those with rights junior to the tribes' (which is everyone including the municipalities) will have to negotiate reallocation;
  6. no existing residence in the state has ever lost the ability to continue to draw water for its existing residential needs; and
  7. ag wants their water needs addressed now and not in 20 years.

Today's forum benefitted from what seemed to be quite a bit of candor on the part of governmental entities, including PUD's acknowledgement that they are not a leading example of transparency. Future forums will be a bit more "partisan" and therefore will require a bit more sifting to find the accurate information, but if taken with a grain of salt, will certainly inform as to positions of interest groups and their perspectives and messaging. The following are tentative forums and participants scheduled:

  • May 17: Diverse Perspectives on Water and Land Use, with reps of dairy ag, land developers, Business Alliance, Rural Water Systems, fishing, PDS, and Futurewise
  • June 7: Water Resource Planning: Past, Present, and Future, with Small Cities Caucus, Water Districts Coalition, County Public Works, Private Well Owners, Citizen's Alliance for Prop. Rights, and Nooksack Salmon Enhancement Ass'n & RE Sources 
  • June 21 or 28: Wrap Up, with Mayor Linville, Water Districts, Non-gov't water systems, tribes, business, environmental community, and ECOL, with Exec. Louws closing the series.

Abe Jacobson  //  Sat, Apr 19, 2014, 3:17 pm

Terry,
Thank you for an excellent recap of the meeting, which I was not able to attend.

Are you aware of any plausible ideas out there for either (a) new surface storage, or (b) engineered groundwater-recharge fields, in order to store a bit more of the winter-season water surpluses for use during the summer ag season? As long as these could be done in a manner that is benign to salmon, they ought to be on the menu of options.

Abe Jacobson


Wendy Harris  //  Sat, Apr 19, 2014, 3:32 pm

I agree with Terry that the Rome Grange did a great job. My takeaway was that everyone is looking to Bellingham, with its abundant water supply, as the great savior.  Let’s hope that whatever the city tries to do with its water supply will be a little more transparent than last time (the attempt to give water to Lynden and Ferndale to “protect Bellingham’s future interests.”)

My concern was and continues to be that we can not address water resource issues (or any other ecosystem issue) on a project by project basis through public opinion and funding opportunity (i.e., state grants).

We need to start viewing water resources in the context of a watershed ecosystem that contains many ecosystem functions, and address problems on a landscape/watershed scale. This requires that we characterize, inventory and assess each watershed, and its sub-basins, to better understand complicated interconnections and synergies.  This information should be developed without interference from shareholders and politics (which is why the Planning Unit is not the solution, and WRIA 1 has not delivered on this.)

I want to see a comprehensive watershed ecosystem characterization analysis of each WRIA 1 watershed, which identifies the best areas for Ag, for residential development, for natural resource and critical area protection or restoration, based on review of issues like ground water and surface water flows and quantities and sources of contamination. We need to see and understand how all ecosystem functions are related and can not be dealt with individually, in isolation from each other. 

Only then is an issue like water resources ready for the political process.  This will provide the opportunity for us to engage in comprehensive, integrated and sustainable planning.  We will have information to make informed choices and determine appropriate priorities, understanding the opportunity costs of each decision. 

Yes, this is a tall order. It is complicated, difficult and expensive.  I can understand why a practical progressive like Carl would advocate for his water plan, rather than the approach I advocate. But I do not see project by project water resource programs being any more successful than our site specific SEPA and critical area reviews.  Without understanding the whole picture, you can not make long term planning decisions.

There is a partial example of how this kind of research and planning could work in the Birch Bay Watershed Characterization Pilot Study.  This was a great piece of work which the county mangled in implementation, a risk that always exists when engaging in complicated comprehensive planning efforts.  And we would need something even greater in scope than what was created in the pilot project.  But what other choice do we have if we really want to be successful?


Terry Wechsler  //  Sun, Apr 20, 2014, 7:44 am

Abe,
I believe it was Doug Allen, Manager of the Bellingham Office of the Department of Ecology, who raised the issue after Marty Maberry, for ag, mentioned their need for water in the summer. It was merely in passing, and when Marty did not seem receptive, it was immediately dismissed because of cost. That was consistent with the general theme whenever solutions were mentioned, with PUD (Steve Jilk, manager) and Maberry emphasizing solutions that are cheap and “easy.” Of course, we all know nothing about this is easy, but there you have it.


Terry Wechsler  //  Sun, Apr 20, 2014, 8:04 am

Sorry, Abe, I didn’t actually answer your question. No, I’m not aware of any plausible methods of storage, but Carl or Doug may be. Unfortunately, judging by the lists of participants, I don’t believe future forums will yield unbiased information about that.


Terry Wechsler  //  Sun, Apr 20, 2014, 11:30 am

Carl Weimer’s online survey, intended to inform the County Council’s Water Action Plan, is still active. The link to it is + Link


Jean Melious  //  Sun, Apr 20, 2014, 3:40 pm

I thought that the takeaway was that all we need to do is find a previously-unknown deep aquifer.  Marty Maberry made a startling announcement about the discovery of a deep aquifer in the Seattle area that’s “bigger than the Amazon and the Columbia Rivers combined”— a vast source of clean water that isn’t in hydraulic continuity with anything.  I don’t know where this discovery was announced—not anywhere that’s yet available through the basic Google search method—but the effect was like pennies from heaven.  Many people in the crowd thought that the new aquifer was here in Whatcom County, judging by subsequent questions, and many will now be convinced that all we have to do is search and we’ll find one of our own.

It doesn’t really matter how often the agency people say “There’s no silver bullet” when a silver bullet has been waved in front of us.  I wish that the technical folks on the panel had addressed this.


Jean Melious  //  Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 8:33 am

Ah ha!  Someone who is a better Googler than I found this: 
+ Link

It describes an enormous underwater canyon—that is, SEA WATER that “flows up from the depths of the Pacific,” not a giant, unknown fresh water aquifer. And researchers knew that this underwater canyon exists. They didn’t know the volume of SEA WATER (with low oxygen and high acid levels) that comes up through the canyon.  “That’s why it’s so salty in Puget Sound,” according to a UW oceanographer who co-authored a report on this canyon.  + Link

The problem is that, once people hear that there may be giant rivers of fresh water that we don’t know about it, it’s really hard to put the genie back into the bottle.  There will now be a sizable population of folks clamoring for money to be spent on finding secret underground rivers, rather than doing the more mundane work of figuring out how to do a better job with what we have. 

Here’s what the first link says:
+966666666666666
“University of Washington researchers said they are astounded by the volume of deep SEA WATER that is flowing through an underwater canyon at the mouth of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. They say it’s enough to fill Century Link Field every second.  Twenty to 30 times more water comes up through that canyon than all of the rivers and streams that feed Puget Sound combined. 

Scientists at the UW School of Applied Sciences said today that results from a machine they lowered into the canyon on a research mission last year, measured those massive flows. They describe it as an underwater river as big as the Columbia and Amazon combined that flows uphill from the depths of the Pacific and into the Strait.

Their studies also identified the flow triggers giant underwater waves, as big as skyscrapers that roll through the Strait churning and mixing up nutrients that help feed the Puget Sound’s unusually large shellfish populations.

It also brings some unwelcome elements like low oxygen and high acid levels that are blamed for some fish die offs. But it is a naturally occurring event that has shaped Puget Sound and now that scientists understand it better, they can better understand how it affects the underwater world.”


Abe Jacobson  //  Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 10:07 am

Whoa! In asking about plausible schemes for storing excess winter precipitation in either recharging groundwater or filling reservoirs, I did not imagine that the conversation would go all Roswell Space Aliens on me!

If indeed Marty Maberry believes there is a deep aquifer in the Seattle area that’s “bigger than the Amazon and the Columbia Rivers combined”, then the loss of scientific literacy in America is even worse than I had feared! Fox News 24/7 has turned brains into guacamole.

I do hope, notwithstanding such risible rumors as those quoted above, that the technical feasibility, estimated cost, and means of paying that cost will be explored for water-storage proposals that are based on scientific literacy. And no, a CNN-style “black hole” will not cut the mustard.

Abe Jacobson (research scientist @ UW, and veteran curmudgeon)


Terry Wechsler  //  Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 10:50 am

Video of the forum is here: + Link

And thank you, Jean, for that summary of the deep-water-waiting-to-solve-all-our-problems bombshell dropped by Marty Maberry. One clarification: Marty said there’s a deep river under Seattle, deep aquifer under Whatcom County. Or vice versa. It was muddled by the fact that he threw that bomb and then ran for cover, knowing any real discussion by panelists would reveal that as the excuse-for-doing-nothing that it is. The clear implication was, “So what if ag pollutes the aquifer beyond the point that anyone can use it for anything. We’ll just dig deeper to the next reservoir.” Or river.

Abe, you should have been there. It was, indeed, quite Roswellian.


Jean Melious  //  Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 10:58 am

Hi Abe,

I wasn’t responding to your question about water storage, but rather commenting on what seemed to be one of the major takeaways from the forum. Unfortunately. 

Not that you can blame people—it’s only human to hope that we’ll stumble across the gold of El Dorado.  (Otherwise, we wouldn’t have a lottery.)  I just hope that the County has enough technical wherewithal to respond reasonably, rather than politically, to the likely future calls to fund the hunt for an underwater Amazon.

I’m no hydrogeologist, but the literature I’ve read hasn’t seemed to indicate that deep aquifers are likely to be our panacea in Whatcom County.  That’s why I wished that the technical folks on the panel had commented.  Doug Allen did point out that deeper aquifers in north county tend to be saline, so that was helpful.


Water, Water Everywhere, but ...

Sat, Apr 19, 2014, 1:57 pm  //  Terry Wechsler

or How Not to Plan for Future Generations' Water Needs

10 comments; last on Apr 21, 2014

Lecture on County Water Issues Draws Crowd

Fri, Dec 06, 2013, 11:03 pm  //  Wendy Harris

The county will be required to consider water quality and water quantity when planning rural growth.

3 comments; last on Dec 10, 2013

Village Books

In historic Fairhaven. Take Exit 250 from I-5.

Our Water - War or Pieces?

Fri, May 24, 2013, 12:18 am  //  Guest writer

Marian Beddill provides a general guide for the public, with a look at the history of water rights in Washington state.

4 comments; last on May 26, 2013

Closing Arguments in Defense of the Reconveyance

Mon, Mar 11, 2013, 6:37 am  //  Guest writer

Guest writer Shane Roth writes in favor of the reconveyance of Lake Whatcom land back to the county.

1 comments; last on Mar 11, 2013

Aquatic Invasive Species Plan for Lake Whatcom

Mon, Jan 28, 2013, 1:52 am  //  Wendy Harris

Improving ecosystem functions holistically is the best form of protection for the Lake Whatcom.

1 comments; last on Jan 28, 2013

Is Noncompliance Addicting?

Fri, Jan 11, 2013, 1:35 pm  //  Wendy Harris

A proposed amendment to the Lake Whatcom watershed moratorium will increase water quality degradation

1 comments; last on Jan 12, 2013

Noncompliance 2013: The Game

Sun, Jan 06, 2013, 11:49 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Watch the Whatcom County Council wiggle its way out of the latest round of GMA compliance requirements for Lake Whatcom

1 comments; last on Jul 27, 2013

City Staff Lacks Impartiality On Dock Closure

Tue, May 15, 2012, 6:32 pm  //  Wendy Harris

A City staff memo on the Bloedel dock closure reads more like an advocacy brief

0 comments

Squalicum Mountain development gets favors from county

Sat, Feb 18, 2012, 3:03 pm  //  Guest writer

No EIS - no real county planning concern about developing Squalicum Mountain and degrading Lake Whatcom water even further.

0 comments

Lake regulations will increase development

Mon, Nov 14, 2011, 11:07 am  //  Wendy Harris

Proposed new storm water regulations will increase Lake Whatcom development. Hearing this Thursday.

1 comments; last on Nov 14, 2011

Lake Whatcom Issues Ignored During Elections

Sun, Nov 06, 2011, 10:48 pm  //  Wendy Harris

Important events concerning the Lake occurred during the election with little comment from the public, the candidates or the media.

16 comments; last on Nov 10, 2011

Loss of trust in Washington Conservation Voters

Wed, Oct 19, 2011, 12:23 pm  //  Guest writer

Sue Taylor guest writes this perspective on WCV and their alliance with the Dan Pike for mayor campaign.

16 comments; last on Oct 23, 2011

Time To Move Forward On The Lake Whatcom Forest Preserve

Fri, Jul 22, 2011, 6:35 am  //  Wendy Harris

A pro-active, extremely cost effective solution for protecting Lake Whatcom exists!

3 comments; last on Jul 22, 2011

The Political Junkie Interviews Christina Maginnis

Mon, Jul 18, 2011, 9:03 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

The Political Junkie interviews Christina Maginnis

4 comments; last on Jul 22, 2011

Just An Insignificant Little Road

Mon, Feb 02, 2009, 7:57 am  //  g.h.kirsch

While it went almost unheralded Friday, Kremen & Co temporarily backed away from their earlier position that driving a road into the forest on Squalicum Mountain, to…

4 comments; last on Feb 02, 2009

Remember Lake Whatcom?

Mon, Dec 29, 2008, 12:13 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

At the risk of displeasing friend and foe alike, may I ask what has been accomplished this past year to fix Lake Whatcom and protect Bellingham's water supply?…

12 comments; last on Jan 02, 2009

Still the Big Hurdle for Reconveyance

Tue, Sep 30, 2008, 4:19 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

From the outset of discussion of the proposal to reconvey forest lands to the county for a new park I have written that it is necessary to first…

1 comments; last on Oct 01, 2008

Stillman Creek: Real Possibility or Scare Tactic?

Wed, Sep 17, 2008, 9:41 pm  //  Tom Pratum

This past winter, during torrential rains to the South of us, there were some very serious slides on Weyerhaeuser land in Lewis County adjacent to Stillman Creek (a…

5 comments; last on Sep 20, 2008

Deja vu All Over Again

Mon, Jun 30, 2008, 2:33 am  //  g.h.kirsch

No matter how one hopes things will change, things remain the same. Bellingham wants the county to curb development in the watershed, but can't seem to stop allowing…

2 comments; last on Jul 05, 2008

Trails to Nowhere

Fri, Jun 27, 2008, 11:16 pm  //  Myron Wlaznak

I received a Notice of Complete Application for the construction of an impervious trail through the center of a parcel of forested land acquired with funds collected for…

5 comments; last on Jul 01, 2008

City hall misleading on geese kill plans

Fri, Jun 20, 2008, 11:26 am  //  Guest writer

by Wendy Harris |
Wendy is a resident of Silver Beach on the north side of Lake Whatcom. This is her second guest writer article - and follows…

0 comments

Who’ll Stop the Raid

Mon, Jun 16, 2008, 10:33 am  //  g.h.kirsch

While the Lake Whatcom Water & Sewer District races to expand its infrastructure to serve sprawling development on the north shore of the lake, the King County Superior…

2 comments; last on Jun 18, 2008

Kill Lawns, Not Geese

Sun, Jun 15, 2008, 12:17 pm  //  Guest writer

By Wendy Harris
Wendy is a resident of Silver Beach on the north side of Lake Whatcom. She is an active citizen. Today she is our first guest writer.…

9 comments; last on Jul 31, 2008

THE LAKE & ECOLOGY; Can’t Have One Without The Other

Mon, May 26, 2008, 8:51 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

Why all the hubbub about building moratoria in the Lake Whatcom watershed? You can't build or subdivide without adequate water, and the entire watershed is closed to new…

1 comments; last on Jun 01, 2008

Saving the Lake

Tue, May 20, 2008, 12:08 am  //  g.h.kirsch

Another important step towards dealing with the pollution of Lake Whatcom was taken tonight. The mayor and city council have thrown down the gauntlet to Pete Kremen and…

14 comments; last on Jun 01, 2008

Casting Our Lots in the Lake Whatcom Watershed

Fri, Apr 04, 2008, 10:42 am  //  Tom Pratum



In early February, I and several other folks met with Whatcom County Parks director Mike McFarlane to ask some questions about the proposed reconveyance of Forest Board…

3 comments; last on Sep 25, 2008

Herald editorial on Lake Whatcom land deal

Sun, Sep 30, 2007, 9:03 pm  //  John Servais

The Bellingham Herald editorial today is excellent. It raises the basic questions about the newly proposed Lake Whatcom land reconveyance deal to make a park on the very…

0 comments

Lake Whatcom land deal; “technicality” loses Herald’s letters

Tue, Sep 25, 2007, 9:25 pm  //  John Servais

Tom Pratum has some good information on the proposed - and still mostly secret - Lake Whatcom land reconveyance plan. He posted it on the North Cascades Audubon…

0 comments

My posts here were accurate

Sat, Sep 22, 2007, 9:40 pm  //  John Servais

The October surprise is a week early. Today's Herald has the carefully managed news of the land swap that John Watts alerted us to on Sep 11 -…

0 comments

No denials in land swap accusation

Wed, Sep 12, 2007, 10:12 pm  //  John Servais

Rather than answer several emails individually, this post will clarify a couple things. First, why is yesterday's post by John Watts that I praised any different from his…

0 comments

Prediction of an October Surprise

Tue, Sep 11, 2007, 10:19 pm  //  John Servais

An astounding post by John Watts this afternoon on his HamsterTalk website. He has what amounts to a prediction of an October Surprise - implying strongly that it…

0 comments

Mercury in Lake Whatcom

Thu, Jun 03, 2004, 6:15 pm  //  John Servais

Today the Washington Department of Ecology released a report that says, basically, that mercury in the lake is less now than in the past. "Decreasing" is the operative…

0 comments

Re: Chamber of Commerce insert in today’s Bellingham Herald

Mon, May 24, 2004, 6:22 pm  //  John Servais

The initiative is 'remove motor boats', not 'remove boats' from Lake Whatcom. Our Chamber of Commerce just lies in print to achieve their goal of defeating the initiative.

0 comments

Benzene in Lake Whatcom water

Fri, Feb 13, 2004, 7:48 pm  //  John Servais

We see 1/100 of one part per billion or less of benzene to water during most of the year 2000 and into the spring of 2001. Then in…

0 comments

Not political conservative but real conservative

Thu, Feb 12, 2004, 7:52 pm  //  John Servais

Motor boats off Lake Whatcom? What was that apology from City Senior Planner Chris Spens at the city council on Monday? El-bull-in-china-shop Chris got the word from el…

0 comments

Mercury, anyone?

Mon, Feb 09, 2004, 7:57 pm  //  John Servais

We have mercury contamination all over our county. That we know. Lake Whatcom and Bellingham Bay. Georgia Pacific's chlorine plant leaked mercury for about 35 years and neither…

0 comments

Lack of environmental enforcement

Sun, Nov 23, 2003, 3:51 pm  //  John Servais

of some local developers is plain to see in this photo essay at the Lake Whatcom website. The WA Dept of Ecology has enforcement folks tooling around in…

0 comments

Very quietly, more and more liberals are

Mon, Oct 13, 2003, 6:38 pm  //  John Servais

telling me they are voting for Brett Bonner for mayor. Some very prominent ones - but they are not going public. Why not? Fear of retaliation.

Why are they…

0 comments

Mayoral Debate

Wed, Oct 08, 2003, 6:51 pm  //  John Servais

The two differed strongly on several issues. The differences between them are becoming more apparent and this should continue for the next two weeks.

Brett continues to develop his…

0 comments

Remember the ‘Truth Squad’?

Sun, Oct 05, 2003, 7:12 pm  //  John Servais

We need one to follow Asmundson during the next three weeks - and to nudge the Herald to do minimal checking of facts before publishing. I'm referring to…

0 comments

Election Forums

Tue, Sep 30, 2003, 5:55 pm  //  John Servais

The first of three Bellingham Herald Election Forums is taking place this evening at the County Council chambers.

The forums are being broadcast live on KGMI radio, 790 AM.…

0 comments

A stand must be taken to protect water quality

Wed, Jun 25, 2003, 5:07 pm  //  John Servais

Posted here because the Bellingham Herald has now ignored this for two days. Of very high importance to Bellingham - and with significant developments.

On Monday evening, the Bellingham…

0 comments

The system does not work when there are no checks on state agencies

Fri, Jun 13, 2003, 12:20 pm  //  John Servais

St. Joe's Hospital will probably be facing fines for venting toxic gas into the construction area of their new addition. Our Bellingham Herald has not reported a bit…

0 comments

City Council support for Clean Water Alliance

Tue, May 13, 2003, 6:00 pm  //  John Servais

The Bellingham City Council last night voted 5-2 to support the Clean Water Alliance legal action against Whatcom County's designation of Sudden Valley as an Urban Growth Area…

0 comments

Very first PFD meeting finally scheduled

Mon, May 12, 2003, 3:15 pm  //  John Servais

The Bellingham City Council will finally hold its very first public hearing of the Public Facilities District (PFD) proposals next Monday, May 19, 7 pm at city hall.…

0 comments

 

New Links

Julia Ioffe/New Republic
the Oatmeal

Current Interest

Community Wise Bellingham
counterpunch
Friends of Whatcom
Guardian Unlimited
Lummi Island Quarry
Reconveyance Challenge
Whatcom Elections

Publisher Recommended

counterpunch
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
League of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Sweeney Politics

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald
Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Bellingham Police Activity
Chuckanut Community Forest
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reconveyance Challenge
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters

Governments

Bellingham
Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Whatcom Elections

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog
Climate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate

Leisure

Adventures NW
Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy

Good Links

Al-Jazeera online
Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

NwCitizen 1995 - 2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Internet At Its Best

TED

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register
Carl Weimer
David Hackworth
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers