Chapter 2:  Playing the race card

Permalink +

Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 9:02 pm  //  Dick Conoboy

After the “Shout Down” by Council President Pinky Vargas on August 8, Anne Mackie and Dick Conoboy received the following email from Council Member April Barker, author of the motion to remove “owner occupancy” requirements for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) in single-family neighborhoods. Bellingham’s working class neighborhoods have no protective covenants to prevent absentee owners from converting backyards into more rental units.

Hello Anne and Dick,

Thank you for your comments to Council during public comment. I heard your concerns. In the future, please remember, my interests lie in looking at all these issues through a race equity lens. 

Using 'owner-occupied' language in policy must be very intentional, as it can be perceived, and has been used historically, as exclusionary. Absolutely, there are places in the City that are subject to predatory developers and leasing agents that would warrant adding this restrictive language. However, there may be circumstances where the language wouldn't match the intent of the zoning. Or maybe in areas that have grown to be very exclusive, removing the language could add opportunity for inclusion. 

As you know this Comprehensive Plan was not noticed as to discuss an ADU ordinance. Thus, many were not aware of the opportunity to be heard. Because of this, leaving the language in the Comp Plan would have been irresponsible of the Council and thwarted the public process. Had the tables been turned, many would have felt blindsided with language that bound the Council's hands to not allow for restrictive language in a future ordinance.

I am confident we will have a very dynamic discussion when the ordinance comes forward to Council for consideration. Then we can decide what language is appropriate for where.

As always, please call or email if you would like further clarification or what to discuss your concerns and ideas. Feel free to share my email with your Neighborhood Associations.
Cheers, 

April Barker
City Council Member, Ward 1

Anne Mackie’s response to April Barker and other members of the Council, August 15.

Dear Bellingham City Council Members:

The ongoing discussion about our city's Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, and specifically the recent majority Council vote to remove the "owner occupancy" requirement for ADUs, has degenerated into accusations toward citizens who disagree with that vote. We have been unfairly characterized as not supporting "race equity," being "anti renters," and even not being supportive of "different people." These types of false accusations serve to intimidate citizens who wish to participate in the public debate about the Comprehensive Plan.  Using these kinds of tactics are harmful to the full participation of citizens. Being labeled as something we are not is inappropriate in a public discourse. What we are about is protecting opportunities for families to achieve home ownership and protect single family neighborhoods from being overrun by absentee landlords who serve to profit from an up-zone and a property gift from this zoning change. 

April Barker states: "my interests lie in looking at all these issues through a race equity lens."  She further states, that "owner occupied language" has been used "historically, as exclusionary."  The implication of her statement is that, somehow, neighborhoods or individuals who object to the removal of the "owner occupancy" requirement for ADUs in single family neighborhoods are not in support of "race equity."  That is, someone such as myself who supports the "owner occupancy" zoning requirement is somehow racially exclusionary? 

A second example of Ms. Barker's false accusations happened during the August 1, 2016, City Council meeting when she stated that people are "mistaken that renters are bad. They aren't." Again, this was in the context of her arguments to remove "owner occupancy" as a requirement for ADUs in single family zones. I, and others who are opposed to removing this requirement, worked for over 15 years to get renters' rights for safe housing through the Rental Registration and Inspection program.  We certainly should not be unfairly characterized by Ms. Barker as "anti renters."

A third example of Ms. Barker's false accusations occurred during the June 20, 2016, City Council meeting in which she expresses concerns that people who do not support removal of the owner-occupancy requirement for ADUs in single family zones are not supportive of "making room for different housing types and different people." In that meeting (video time slot 51:01) Barker is addressing the issue of the murderous rampage by the individual who attacked the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, FL, on June 12, 2016.  During this portion of the meeting Council members Vargas, Knutson, Murphy, and Barker expressed opinions about the Orlando tragedy.  It was a highly-charged moment in the meeting. For all of America, it was an emotional and terrifying event. For myself, the proud mother of a married LGBT couple, it was excruciatingly terrifying because I have loved ones who have been and will continue to be the target of bigotry. 

Ms. Barker turned this tragedy into an opportunity to express her opinion about people who do not support the dismantling of single family zoning by allowing non-owner occupied ADUs, as people who do not want to make room for "different people" in our neighborhoods. Connecting the Orlando murder rampage to the issue of ADUs in Bellingham is nothing but opportunism on her part.  The tactic of using a "straw man" is nothing but a debate tool designed to falsely characterize one's opponents.  Ms. Barker's false accusations toward citizens who disagree with her position is, in my opinion, not acceptable behavior for an elected official.

I am waiting to be accused of being anti-single mothers and children, as well; but before that false insinuation is stated, let me set the record straight.  I have been one of those single mothers and I have been a political activist for 50 years in the women's liberation, pro-choice, civil rights movement, pro-LGBT, and labor movements. I can stand on my record and am proud of it. 

I was the target of rude behavior by Council President Vargas and Council member Murphy during the August 8, 2016, meeting -- with giggling and laughing while I spoke -- and then I was shouted down when I exceeded the three minute time limit by 30 seconds. Unlike members of the real estate and building industry, who frequently exceed the three-minute time limit, I was not afforded the simple courtesy to be allowed to wrap up my remarks. 

This action, now coupled with the attached letter from Ms. Barker and her previously recorded false accusations toward citizens who disagree with her position, serves to intimidate and stifle public participation in a process that must be open to public discourse.  I believe that public discourse on the Comprehensive Plan update is protected by law and the Washington State Growth Management Act. 

Please advise me as to how you, as a Council, will correct these injuries to myself and other citizens who are attempting to exercise our rights to be heard.

Respectfully,
Anne Mackie

Dick Conoboy’s response to April and other members of the city council, 16 April 2016.

April,

Thanks for taking time to respond to the concerns from me and Anne Mackie about removing the ‘owner-occupied’ language in the Comp Plan section addressing ADU’s. 
 
I stand with Anne’s reflection in her message […] on your lens of “race equity” which implies that those of us who are fighting hard to maintain the character of our neighborhoods are somehow not interested or ignoring the equity issue.  I do not find that approach productive.
 
Personally, I have been dealing with equity issues my entire life from an early age when my family could not buy into a neighborhood a block away where Jews and Negroes were specifically excluded.  My mother was a Jew.  For all my childhood from my non-Jewish “friends”, I constantly heard talk of kikes and yids from these people who did not know my origins but thought I was an ally in their prejudices.  As a young boy I was severely physically handicapped which led to a decade or more of physical and psychological difficulties, ignored by my parochial school educators who had little sense of compassion or equity. I spent nearly a decade in the 70s and 80s working for recognition of sexual stereotyping as it affects males in our society only to receive the sneers and vitriol of the feminists of the time.  With little or no help (and at times active opposition) from city council and city hall, I fought for nearly ten years along with Anne to get licensing and inspection legislation to protect ALL renters regardless of race.  Yes, April, I know a few equity issues.
 
And now you indicate that the term ‘owner-occupied’ “can be perceived, and has been used historically, as exclusionary” (i.e., not consistent with race equality).  I fail to see the nexus between requirement for owner occupancy and anything to do with race.  At your convenience, would you please provide a few examples of where owner-occupied ADU’s has been found to be racist?
 
If you want to probe equity issues, you need to talk to the landlords (the rentier class), resident or often absentee, who have bought up properties by the dozens that they now rent at exorbitant prices while taking homes out of the market that might have been available to potential home buyers of more modest means.  You need to talk to the Realtors who fail to enforce their own code of ethics to police the outrageous behavior of those landlords and property managers who regularly flaunt the laws of the city.  You need to talk to the builders and developers who will not consider affordable housing unless they get their expected tax break or fee relief to ensure maximum profits.  Where is their sense of equity?  Where is their sense of community?
 
The city also has to address the equity issue of a living wage such as they have done in the city of Seattle.  When will you be proposing to boost the minimum wage in Bellingham from the paltry state standard of $9.47 [$19,000/yr] to a true, living wage of $20 an hour? (Yes, not even $15/hour works when a house rents for $30.000 per year.  Do the math).  When will the council look at the price gouging in the rental market?  Is that not also an equity issue? [Note: Minimum wage requirements for some small businesses may require special attention.]

Additionally, you seem confused about what had been in the city’s comprehensive plan since 1995.  The ‘owner-occupied’ language was not being added to the comprehensive plan; it has been there for more than 20 years.  Rather, council’s vote removed this language from the comprehensive plan.  Your logic that the comprehensive plan was not “noticed” as to discuss an ADU ordinance actually supports leaving the comprehensive plan language as it has been for the past two decades.
 
The action to remove the owner occupancy requirement is little more than a not-so-subtle, back door rezone of all single family neighborhoods (except those lucky enough to have restrictive covenants which then turns ADU placement into a crap shoot).  You speak often of property rights.  Property rights extend to the individual homeowners as well as the landlords who are good at rent extraction but not much else. 

Regards,

Dick

Related Links:

-> Temper Tantrum Taints City Council - by Anne and Dick

Thomas R. Scott  //  Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 11:24 pm

I wish I could feign shock at how civil discourse has faltered lately at many levels of government. Sadly, I cannot. The race card and double-talk at the national level have become the norm.

Our local politics have been tainted from time to time as well.  However, I see a new level of late.

First, insinuations and even more open charges of racism and amorphous phobias employed so as to shut up those earnestly disagreeing or questioning a given topic or decision. Then, logic is altered into double-speak or inverse logic.

Recent activities and statements (verbal and written) from at least a couple City Council members lately defy civil discourse through borderline to outright rude behavior crossing the line into physical confrontation. This followed by insinuations of racism, general exclusionism and double-speak.

Then Councilmember Barker turned logic on its head (in writing).  This was with regard to why removing “owner occupancy” for Auxiliary Dwelling Units (ADUs) in Single Family zoning without notice was the right thing to do.

As she writes two engaged citizens, she admits to a lack of notice with “As you know this Comprehensive Plan was not noticed as to discuss an ADU ordinance.” She continues to admit, “Thus, many were not aware of the opportunity to be heard.”

From a logic perspective, all fine and good so far. Yes, lack of notice logically results in lack of awareness. I would also add it results in a lack of “daylight” and openness (as required by law, but I digress).

Then the logic flips as she states, “Because of this, leaving the language in the Comp Plan” (as in NOT making a change) “would have been irresponsible of the Council and thwarted the public process.” She polishes that off with another inverse logic “Had the tables been turned, many would have felt blindsided…”

In the first inverse logic, a lack of notice is equated with the responsible need to make a change to the Comprehensive Plan language.  Normally a lack of notice, by logic and by law, must result in the status quo until a future time when notice is properly given as per the proper process. Apparently, Councilmember Barker believes otherwise.

She even slips in additional inverse logic by mentioning the “public process” which, by the way, requires notice.

In the second inverse logic musing, she somehow believes that a lack of change would have “blindsided” folks when nothing happened just when they expected nothing to happen. Logic dictates that nobody is blindsided when expectations are met.

If her intention was to NOT blindside the public, she, and other councilmembers failed miserably as most citizens paying attention were blindsided. (The possible/probable exception being some of her peers in the real estate, development and rental management communities. As I understand it, they were virtually the only persons who seemed in attendance at the meeting in question aside from City staff and the Council itself).

Again she WROTE this.  Apparently, this is her CONSIDERED opinion.  Time was taken to settle her thoughts. Write them down, reconsider them, spell check them and send them off.

I have two “take aways”:
1 - Logic and law dictate that, regardless of any merits, the motion to remove the language, thus, taking action without notice and proper process must be considered void due to the process violation.
2 - Attempts to bully erstwhile citizens taking part in the public process must stop immediately.


Tim Paxton  //  Wed, Aug 24, 2016, 2:39 am

This contemptible and illegal lack of public notice is a deliberate tactic by the City Executive branch and the legal staff.

Smells like big bribes are being protected by the City.  Nothing else explains their sudden intense interest in scamming the public.

 


David Camp  //  Wed, Aug 24, 2016, 8:14 am

Does it strike anyone else as passing strange that a City Councilor, supposed to represent the interests of the citizens who elected her, seems to believe that her sole role is to promote race equity? What else does this mean: “I heard your concerns. In the future, please remember, my interests lie in looking at all these issues through a race equity lens.”

So the April Barker Racial Equality Crusade trumps all citizen concerns - and if we little citizens dare criticize the saintly Ms. Barker and her selfless crusade for racial equality we must be filthy racists?


Junga Subedar  //  Wed, Aug 24, 2016, 1:16 pm

Thank you April Barker for your comment and insight on how the inclusion of “owner occupancy” for Accessory Dwelling Units can adversely affect some neighborhoods and people.


Marilyn Williams  //  Wed, Aug 24, 2016, 5:32 pm

Thank you Thomas for helping me understand what I thought had to be ignorance on my part, because I could not understand what April Barker meant when she said that it would be irresponsible and thwart the public process (so on). Inverse logic.

I, too, am concerned that this meeting was almost held in secret and a huge decision - a change to the comprehensive plan - was made without noticing the public. I must be old fashioned, because I always thought that public input was part of the process and a decision wasn’t made until all things were considered. And, what the public wanted was what we got. When did the rule become - “We The Government?”

Only one group is excluded with the “owner occupied” language and that group is not a protected group - investors. A return on investment is not a right.

This town sorely lacks equity. The growth machine has divided this town into ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ by telling those of us that worked hard, made tough choices and managed to hang on during many recession and life events, that we do not deserve to keep what we have. We do not deserve to enjoy the fruits of our labor, since that is selfish. We should instead give to those that want easy money by buying property and renting to people who need housing. Turning things around and making it about not sharing with renters.

FYI - I live in multifamily zoning. All I asked for was some decent design review, that required the buildings fit into the surrounding housing. But, even that was too exclusionary for the city of Bellingham. It limited the builders choices.


Tip Johnson  //  Thu, Aug 25, 2016, 2:28 pm

While sensitive to the need for careful consideration of race equity in the promulgation of city code, it does not justify the removal of the owner-occupied requirement for ADUs.  This requirement should apply to any owner of any property with ADU potential, without regard for race (color, creed, etc.).

ADUs have the potential to diversify our housing stock and provide more affordable housing solutions without public investment. This benefits anyone of lower income, regardless of race, etc.

There are many other advantages to ADUs, like helping homeowners make their nut, helping tenants save to buy, creating community with it’s helpful advantages, like “eyes on the property” security, like low-impact infill, etc.

I’m all for ADUs because we need to practice smarter housing.  We have gotten very good at enabling stupid housing, like the four+ bedroom duplex animal house student housing developments, or the seven bedroom single family homes managed as boarding houses, or the rabbit warren stack dorms where there isn’t even room to store a kayak.  I oppose the “not more than three unrelated by blood or marriage” rule because families have become far more diverse.  I think we need much more latitude in exploring housing that keeps folks off the streets and helps them toward better accommodations.  We have essentially legislated affordable housing out of existence.

However, when infilling one’s own backyard, supervision is critical to prevent common nuisances spilling into your neighbor’s or the general public.  This is not discriminatory in any way.  It’s just good management.

It makes me think there may be other, unspoken reasoning behind the change.

1102 E VICTOR ST BELLINGHAM, WA JASON & APRIL BARKER $242,714
3127 BIRCHWOOD AVE BELLINGHAM, WA JASON & APRIL BARKER $227,857
2717 NORTHWEST AVE BELLINGHAM, WA   JASON & APRIL BARKER $159,297


Chapter 2:  Playing the race card

Three emails: April Barker writes about ADUs and her perspective; Anne Mackie and Dick Conoboy respond.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 9:02 pm
6 comments; last on Aug 25, 2016

How Our Community Can Welcome Our Troops Home

Christopher Brown guest writes how traditional communal warrior reintegration practices could help our returning combat veterans.

Guest writer
Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 5:11 am
0 comments

You can’t fight city hall: city hall doesn’t fight fair

Patrick McKee of the Sunnyland Neighborhood guest-writes about the August 11 City Council slap-dash zoning changes.

Guest writer
Fri, Aug 22, 2014, 2:06 pm
2 comments; last on Aug 23, 2014

Reader paid for ads. Click to see all choices.

Devil In the Details

Judith Green of the Sunnyland Neighborhood guest writes this brief summary of what went wrong with the planning last week.

Guest writer
Sat, Aug 16, 2014, 3:48 pm
1 comments; last on Aug 22, 2014

What Landlords Need to Know about Rental Registration

Landlords are so caught up opposing a licensing and inspection ordinance, they cannot see the upside for them in ridding the city of bad rentals.

Guest writer
Mon, Jul 21, 2014, 5:30 am
19 comments; last on Aug 01, 2014

Sunnyland Deja Vu

Judith Green explains how the Bellingham Planning Department is trying to cram their plan onto a neighborhood.

Guest writer
Fri, Jul 18, 2014, 1:24 pm
5 comments; last on Jul 21, 2014

Bellingham’s 2013 Water Quality Report: The Facts But Not the Truth

Bellingham's annual water quality report indicates that city hall's propoganda machine is going strong

Wendy Harris
Tue, May 13, 2014, 5:04 pm
1 comments; last on May 14, 2014

The Marijuana Bowl

Super Bowl ... Weed Bowl ... This bud's for you ... Bong Bowl ... Marijuana Bowl ... whatever. It is on!

John Servais
Sun, Jan 19, 2014, 9:39 pm
1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2014

City too Poor for Power Pennies or Discrimination?

Guest writer Barbara Perry writes about Bellingham Parks refusal to allow motorized wheel chairs to recharge at public electrical outlets.

Guest writer
Fri, Dec 27, 2013, 5:00 am
6 comments; last on Jan 04, 2014

Obamacare and the Coming (Not Again?) Wealth Transfer

You are not likely to escape the coming transfer of $billions from your pocket to the health insurance industry. You will get little, if anything, in return.

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Mar 06, 2013, 11:05 am
4 comments; last on Apr 05, 2013

PeaceHealth Merger Threatens Women’s Health in Whatcom County

Riley details upcoming merger between PeaceHealth and a much more conservative entity

Riley Sweeney
Tue, Feb 26, 2013, 7:39 am
1 comments; last on Feb 27, 2013

The Big Business of Breast Cancer

There’s no profit in searching for causes, and we know there's no real cure. But there's big money in the detection and treatment of breast cancer.

Guest writer
Wed, Feb 08, 2012, 10:14 am
2 comments; last on Feb 11, 2012

Bad Idea, Wrong Place, and Wrong Time

Bob Ferris of Re-Sources takes a values based perspective on our community and a possible coal port.

Guest writer
Mon, Oct 31, 2011, 4:07 pm
9 comments; last on Nov 02, 2011

From a Political Junkie: Abstaining from Abstinence-Only

Riley Sweeney examines facts vs beliefs and comprehensive sex education

Riley Sweeney
Mon, Nov 29, 2010, 6:16 am
4 comments; last on Dec 01, 2010

Questions on Health Care

Some questions on health care reform to our Congressional delegation.

Craig Mayberry
Sat, Mar 27, 2010, 6:45 am
0 comments

Bellingham! It’s The Mercury!

Maybe NOAA knows the truth about our waterfront. Our Port of Bellingham pretends it is not toxic. But it is criminally toxic.

Kamalla Rose Kaur
Wed, Mar 10, 2010, 9:42 pm
2 comments; last on Mar 16, 2010

Aging: The Times Are A-Changin’

By guest writer Nanette Davis, Ph.D. Elder care is a growing crisis nationally and locally.

Guest writer
Sat, Feb 27, 2010, 8:22 pm
1 comments; last on Mar 02, 2010

The Way I See It - Don’t Eat That!

What will New York's proposed salt reduction laws do for us?

Ham Hayes
Wed, Jan 13, 2010, 6:59 am
0 comments

Dear Mr. President

Tip writes a letter to President Obama about Health Care and about his concerns that Obama has sold us short.

Tip Johnson
Thu, Dec 31, 2009, 7:15 pm
8 comments; last on Jan 04, 2010

Real Health Care Reform

This is a reprint of one of my earlier posts on health care. The issue is more timely now and I thought I would re-enter it into the…

Craig Mayberry
Fri, Nov 27, 2009, 10:00 pm
4 comments; last on Dec 14, 2009

Changing the Power Structure

One of the underlying currents of the recent discussions around health care is the role of the federal government. I thought it would be interesting to see how…

Craig Mayberry
Wed, Sep 23, 2009, 11:38 pm
3 comments; last on Sep 25, 2009

Food Safety Czar

Much has been made of czars in the current administration; however, one czar in particular should have people from both political sides a little nervous. In a case…

Craig Mayberry
Tue, Sep 15, 2009, 9:00 am
4 comments; last on Sep 18, 2009

The Future of Health Care Reform

There is an increasingly wide divide in the health care debate that at its source comes down to a fundamental disconnect between the opposing sides. While the Democrats…

Craig Mayberry
Wed, Aug 19, 2009, 1:18 am
4 comments; last on Aug 21, 2009

Price, Volume, Mix

The health care debate seems to center on fixing two important problems. The first is the people who do not have any insurance, and the second is the…

Craig Mayberry
Mon, Aug 10, 2009, 10:40 pm
2 comments; last on Aug 12, 2009

Dear White House,

(sent to flag@whitehouse.gov seeking clarification before I report on people providing erroneous information on health care reform)

How are we suppose to know what is erroneous information abou

Craig Mayberry
Fri, Aug 07, 2009, 12:11 am
4 comments; last on Aug 07, 2009

The Public Health Care Option

The big debate in Congress is now the health care. A number of months ago I posted another option and will repost that again in the next few…

Craig Mayberry
Wed, Jul 15, 2009, 6:56 pm
7 comments; last on Jul 20, 2009

Thanksgiving

I just want anyone who comes by this site today to see a few positive and thankful words. My first thoughts were that my feelings lately are not…

John Servais
Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 3:55 pm
1 comments; last on Nov 28, 2008

Thanksgiving wishes from Lois Garlick

This from Lois Garlick

Dear Friends,

Happy Thanksgiving to everyone.

And thank you. Your support in my campaign for County Executive was tremendous. I had no comprehension

John Servais
Thu, Nov 22, 2007, 4:35 pm
0 comments

The war is wreaking havoc on all

Armed Service veterans are twice as likely to commit suicide as civilians. Just another intangible cost of the insane war in Iraq. (It applies to all male vets…

Site Management
Tue, Jun 12, 2007, 8:03 pm
0 comments

Fluoridation

Got your attention? Time magazine has an article this week about our Bellingham fight over whether or not to put fluoride in our drinking water. It is worth…

John Servais
Wed, Oct 19, 2005, 4:28 pm
0 comments

Like toxic water flowing from GP

The link to No Forced Fluoride in Bellingham is posted to the right. The pro-fluoride initiative backers - financed by Seattle powers with well-laundered money passed along to…

Site Management
Sat, Jul 02, 2005, 5:18 pm
0 comments

Fluoride in water is medicine

We found the nerve endings. The fluoride proponents don't like the word "medicine" as used in the June 16 post below. Of course fluoride in water is just…

Site Management
Wed, Jun 22, 2005, 5:28 pm
0 comments

We want pure clean water

The fluoride proponents don't have a clue. They don't get it. When I open my water tap, I want clean water to come out, not medicine.

These well-meaning folks…

Site Management
Thu, Jun 16, 2005, 5:32 pm
0 comments

Toxic gas news seeps slowly

The carpenters' strike at St. Joe's Hospital continues. They are also striking several other construction sites around Bellingham. The dispute is over the construction industry association reducing th

John Servais
Fri, Jun 27, 2003, 5:59 pm
0 comments

Season’s Greetings

Our annual holiday greetings to readers

John Servais
Tue, Dec 24, 2002, 11:39 pm
0 comments

 

We Thank Our Sponsors

Click to See All Sponsors

About NWCitizen

Donations maintain site

Our writers
Thru the years

League of Women Voters

Calendar of Events

Home page
Videos of Districting Committee

Local Online News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Business Journal
Bham Politics & Econ
Cascadia Weekly
Coal Stop
Ferndale Record
KGMI
KPLU fm radio
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
Noisy Waters
Northern Light
Seattle Times
Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut C. Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Powder River Basin R. C.
RE Sources
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice

Our Governments

- Whatcom County

Bellingham
Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US House
US Senate
US Supreme Court
US The White House
WA State
Whatcom COG

NWCitizen 1995-2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
EPIC World Photos
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That?

Local Leisure

Adventures NW

Bellingham Wins
Entertainment NNW
Recreation Northwest

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Change The Mascot
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
Edge of Sports
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project
Irish Times
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
TED
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
Vox
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register

Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Jack Petree
MikeatthePort
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman
Protect Bellingham Parks
Sweeney Politics
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders