Waterfront “Planned Action Ordinance” Limits Restoration and Public Input
Permalink +Tue, Mar 26, 2013, 9:59 pm // Wendy Harris
I oppose the proposed Planned Action Ordinance (PAO) for the waterfront. The public is being asked to cede oversight and control over waterfront development projects. The PAO will eliminate public rights under SEPA and will restrict environmental regulation of the waterfront. This is contrary to what the public has been promised. Belllingham's administration appears to be relying upon the public's failure to understand the consequences of this technical legal document. The Planning Commission should recommend against entering into a PAO.
The Waterfront District Sub-Area Plan proposes development in phases, with the specific type and amount of development left undetermined. It will be composed of an unknown mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational and institutional uses up to an established maximum density. We are told that flexibility is needed for the uncertainties of the future because waterfront development will occur over several decades. Yet, at the same time, the city asserts that mitigation standards for this unknown future growth are clear and should be frozen in time based on current standards. There is an inherent contradiction in these two positions.
The POA refers to this as “predefined mitigation”, but it is actually a restriction on environmental standards that may be imposed on waterfront developers. Environmental standards change over time. Each update is more restrictive and more expensive for developers because of increased environmental degradation.The public needs to retain the right to amend and revise development standards as necessary. This is being traded for vesting provisions that make development less expensive and less time consuming. This is not in the interest of the public or of workers who seek fair wage jobs and a clean environment. Rather, it promotes business interests.
Under the PAO, the environmental standards applicable today are based on the Waterfront EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) Preferred Alternative. Few people are aware that the Port quietly, without public notice or input, revised the EIS Preferred Alternative in December, 2012. Moreover, EIS reviews are time sensitive and become outdated. Here an EIS would be applicable to development 40 or 50 years from now, without any requirement for a Supplemental EIS. Clearly, a Planned Action Ordinance is not an appropriate document for development planned for future decades. At a minimum, requirements for a Supplement EIS are required.
Instead, the PAO provides that if future development proposals alter assumptions and analysis in the Preferred Alternative, further environmental review MAY be required. It will be entirely within the port or city’s discretion, without requirement for public input. The example provided in the PAO would allow development before infrastructure requirements are in place. (Note: this could subject the port and city to a GMA compliance challenge.) (See PAO, pages 5-6, Phased Development Thresholds.)
While there are review criteria to determine if development projects are covered under the PAO, this determination is within the discretion of the City Planning Director. Moreover, if the Director determines that a development proposal qualifies, he/she issues a “Determination of Consistency”, after which the “project shall proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review procedure, except that no SEPA threshold determination, EIS or additional SEPA review shall be required.” Simply put, the public’s rights under SEPA are eliminated. (See PAO, page 8, Planned Action Permit Process.) The only appeal is before the city Hearings Examiner, a matter for which the city charges approximately $1200.
Please tell the city that you do not support the PAO. The public's rights under SEPA and its ability to enact updated environmental standards should be protected.
Update: Thanks, Marian Beddill, for pointing out that I was incorrectly referring to the Planned Action Ordinance as a "PAC" , instead of a "PAO." Typos corrected.
Comments (1)
To add a comment, click here to login or register.
Marian Beddill // Fri, Mar 29, 2013, 11:11 pm
Just want the facts right, that’s all.
Waterfront “Planned Action Ordinance” Limits Restoration and Public Input
Tue, Mar 26, 2013, 9:59 pm // Wendy Harris
The City Planning Department has included a technical document in the waterfront proposal without disclosing important impacts.1 comments; last on Mar 30, 2013
Valuable Article in the Whatcom Watch
Sun, Mar 17, 2013, 9:42 pm // John Servais
Wendy Harris writes about the proposed $8 million concrete bridge along the Bellingham waterfront - using Greenways funds to build.
3 comments; last on Mar 20, 2013
Johns Repair
Waterfront EIS Revised Without Public Process
Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 10:40 pm // Wendy Harris
An "Updated Preferred Alternative" reduces the number of waterfront jobs and expands the boundary of the waterfront district.
0 comments
Efforts to save the Granary building
Sat, Aug 04, 2012, 12:18 am // John Servais
Graphics projected on building each night in effort to bring attention to threatened building
3 comments; last on Aug 11, 2012
Motivated Reasoning Yields Useless Planning
Mon, Jul 23, 2012, 7:05 pm // John Servais
Where a planning staff desire for view corridors in the Fairhaven plan yields a view corridor that does nothing for views.
1 comments; last on Jul 24, 2012
Scott Walker asks for Charlie Sheldon’s resignation
Wed, Oct 19, 2011, 1:13 am // John Servais
Bellingham Port Commissioner Scott Walker motioned for the port to ask Executive Director Charlie Sheldon to resign.5 comments; last on Oct 19, 2011
From the Political Junkie: A Petree-Eye View of Downtown
Tue, Aug 09, 2011, 5:44 pm // Riley Sweeney
Riley interviews Clayton Petree about his view of Downtown Bellingham
6 comments; last on Aug 12, 2011
Problems with SEPA review of Cornwall Landfill
Thu, Jun 23, 2011, 8:30 am // Wendy Harris
Time is running out for public comment on the Port's proposal to use toxic waste as a cap at waterfront re-development site.5 comments; last on Jul 02, 2011
Port punts on commercial moorage rates
Thu, Feb 17, 2011, 7:30 pm // Guest writer
Guest writer Doug Karlberg follows up with report from Tuesday's Port Commission meeting7 comments; last on Feb 20, 2011
Showdown at the Port of Bellingham
Mon, Feb 14, 2011, 7:35 pm // Guest writer
Why the price of moorage matters to all Whatcom County. A guest article by Doug Karlberg.5 comments; last on Jun 29, 2011
Is Boulevard Park/Cornwall Landfill Overwater Walkway A Toxic Trail?
Wed, Dec 15, 2010, 10:07 pm // Guest writer
Wendy Harris writes about a multi million dollar planned city of Bellingham project.9 comments; last on Dec 18, 2010
Bellingham! It’s The Mercury!
Wed, Mar 10, 2010, 9:42 pm // Kamalla Rose Kaur
Maybe NOAA knows the truth about our waterfront. Our Port of Bellingham pretends it is not toxic. But it is criminally toxic.
2 comments; last on Mar 15, 2010
The Way I See It - Los Angeles Resurrected
Wed, Nov 25, 2009, 9:00 am // Ham Hayes
I’ve been to Los Angeles many times. I even remember the Red and Yellow electric street cars that served the city from after World War II until…
0 comments
The Port of Chmelik
Tue, Nov 24, 2009, 6:12 am // John Servais
Seems like the offices of Frank Chmelik, the attorney for the Port of Bellingham, are becoming our defacto Port offices. Instead of conferences and meetings at the Port,…2 comments; last on Nov 25, 2009
The Mayor’s Statement in the Herald
Sun, Apr 26, 2009, 12:19 pm // John Servais
Dan Pike's guest editorial in Sunday's Herald is a direct result of an article on NwCitizen earlier this week. Indeed, on Wednesday, after the article had only been…
3 comments; last on May 21, 2009
Port of Bellingham gave millions to AIG
Sat, Mar 21, 2009, 10:19 am // John Servais
We local taxpayers have contributed $20 million of our own tax dollars to AIG's executives. Remember? A couple years ago the Port bought an insurance policy from AIG…
3 comments; last on Mar 23, 2009
Fairhaven Shipyard to gain larger drydock
Fri, Jan 02, 2009, 7:23 pm // John Servais
Coming to our Fairhaven waterfront - this magnificent floating drydock. The above aerial photo is of the Fairhaven Shipyard with the new drydock placed as a computer image…
1 comments; last on Jan 03, 2009
New Library ideas
Wed, Jun 25, 2008, 5:20 pm // John Servais
Tired of looking at a photo of geese when you check here? So am I. We have nine writers for this site but it has been rather slack…10 comments; last on Aug 04, 2008
What you can’t see, won’t kill ya - a lesson in TBL
Fri, Feb 22, 2008, 1:24 pm // Ham Hayes
TBL, or Triple Bottom Line, is a nifty concept that says we want to be evaluating and measuring projects on the basis not only of economic, but environmental…5 comments; last on Feb 24, 2008
When Is Less More?
Sat, Feb 02, 2008, 4:55 pm // Tip Johnson
When Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) are prepared, more than one development model might be evaluated. But a no-action alternative is always required as a baseline reference. Convention0 comments
Public hearing started well after 9 pm
Tue, Jul 17, 2007, 5:33 pm // Site Management
It is not bad enough that the city council schedules the public hearing on our future Shoreline Master Plan for the middle of July - a plan many…0 comments
Forums and blogging and pits, oh my!
Thu, Jul 12, 2007, 5:59 pm // Site Management
The Herald does not even follow its own mandates. On Sunday, the editorial said the candidates "...must address 6 big issues." Must. Then they sent out their own…0 comments
Only a government agency would do this.
Mon, Jul 09, 2007, 6:17 pm // Site Management
The Herald ran an ad for the State Department of Ecology informing us of the web site where we could find the Draft Consent Decree for our waterfront…0 comments
Last Chance - Steal this Waterfront!
Thu, May 10, 2007, 4:51 pm // Tip Johnson
In a Bellingham Herald article dated May 4, Interim Mayor Tim Douglas "said it's0 comments
The Port’s Plan to Poison
Thu, Apr 26, 2007, 12:02 pm // Tip Johnson
Why the Log Pond cap won't workAn article in a recent Bellingham Business Journal detailed the debate over whether the toxic muck in the Whatcom Waterway ought to…
0 comments
The So-called News
Mon, Apr 23, 2007, 4:24 pm // Tip Johnson
Independent media? Freedom of the press? Peoples friend, tyrants foe? It was a good idea while it lasted, educating the electorate and forming a mainstay of our democracy.…0 comments
Poisoning the Public - A treacherous legacy
Wed, Apr 18, 2007, 4:49 pm // Tip Johnson
According to the Bellingham Herald, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources has recently approved leaving tons of mercury buried in Bellingham Bay. The documents are not yet…0 comments
Your Waterfront - Up for grabs
Wed, Apr 18, 2007, 4:34 pm // Tip Johnson
New Whatcom Redevelopment Project - The City and Port of Bellingham will hold public information a meeting. Bellingham Cruise Terminal. 355 Harris Ave., Bellingham. WA Times: 6:00 PM.Also,…
0 comments
Response to Bellingham Herald editorial
Thu, Jan 25, 2007, 6:18 pm // John Servais
Today's Bellingham Herald editorial invites an answer. The editorial is good in that it reflects on past bad practices, like allowing GP to dump mercury into Bellingham Bay,…0 comments
Moving Target
Mon, Dec 11, 2006, 3:32 pm // Tip Johnson
One of the more momentous public hearings in Bellingham's history appears to be ready to pass with more than the ordinary confusion. We wrote about some of the…0 comments
Public meeting & hearing rescheduled
Thu, Nov 30, 2006, 2:56 pm // John Servais
Notice:Relative to the last post:
Ecology has rescheduled the public meeting for:
December 7th, 6:30 p.m. ñ 8:30 p.m., Bellingham Cruise Terminal, 355 Harris Avenue, Bell
0 comments
Public Process - Lots of it (kind of),
Mon, Nov 27, 2006, 6:15 pm // Tip Johnson
or I lied (sort of!)In the previous post I complained that the biggest rip-off in Whatcom County history was happening without even being discussed or making it into…
0 comments
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Sun, Nov 26, 2006, 5:21 pm // Tip Johnson
The good? We are no longer spewing forty+ pounds of mercury vapor every day into the local atmosphere. We are no longer dumping 20 to 40 tons of…0 comments
Traffic and Western Washington University
Mon, Mar 01, 2004, 8:20 pm // John Servais
If WWU gets their way, $20 million in state taxes will be spent on jack-hammering out good roads and building new ones a hundred yards away. No increase…0 comments
The Port Commissioner campaign is getting hot
Wed, Aug 27, 2003, 4:57 pm // John Servais
Ginny Benton, seeking her third term as commissioner, stated this evening at the Rome Grange that she will not respond to the "mud slinging" being done against her.…0 comments
Web site to check out
Mon, May 12, 2003, 7:08 pm // John Servais
Waterfront Futures for Bellingham - nothing here. This is one of those processes t0 comments
Tis time to focus on local issues
Thu, May 01, 2003, 7:40 pm // John Servais
Elections this fall could bring positive change to Whatcom County and Bellingham. In particular, we need a new Mayor and we need a new Port Commissioner. The challenge…0 comments
New Links
the OatmealCurrent Interest
Community Wise BellinghamFriends of Whatcom
Guardian Unlimited
Lummi Island Quarry
Reconveyance Challenge
Whatcom Elections
Publisher Recommended
GlobalPostGuardian Unlimited
League of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Sweeney Politics
Local Blogs & News
Bellingham HeraldBham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch
Local Causes
Bellingham Police ActivityChuckanut Community Forest
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Jail - local mega plans
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reconveyance Challenge
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Governments
BellinghamPort of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Whatcom Elections
Weather & Climate
Cliff Mass Weather BlogClimate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Leisure
Adventures NWEdge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy
Good Links
Al-Jazeera onlineAlaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com
NwCitizen 1995 - 2007
Early Northwest CitizenInternet At Its Best
TEDQuiet, Offline or Dead
Bellingham RegisterCarl Weimer
David Hackworth
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers