Greenways may reverse heron colony buffer purchase this evening

Permalink +

Fri, Jun 03, 2016, 12:29 am  //  John Servais

The surprise revised agenda that was used at the meeting. This was never posted to the city website. The parks director brought printed copies to the meeting.

Updated late night, June 2
 
I went to the Greenways Advisory Committee meeting at 7 pm this evening, based on the agenda posted online at the city website. That agenda now displays below this article.  Above is the revised agenda that Leslie Bryson, the city Parks Director, brought to the meeting. Note above that the executive session to consider an "acquisition matter" and the followup vote are both missing. As of now, on looking at the city website, the original agenda is still posted. Perhaps tomorrow it will be replaced with the agenda actually used tonight.

The meeting led me to despair of any action by the Greenways committee to purchase the needed buffer woods for the Great Blue Heron colony in south Bellingham. I was chastised more than once during the time I had to speak, being told I had misunderstood the resolution last month. Bryson explained how the process to study and decide on the land acquisition could take a year or more.  Indeed, I learned the parks department has been studying one or more acquisitions for almost two years now and is not yet ready to make a recommendation. 

While I was answering one question, a committee member interrupted to know why they were allowing this guy to “take over their meeting”. I replied, sorry, no problem, and retired to the side of the room and basically spoke no more. 

The committee showed a lack of knowledge about the situation. They felt the area already protected and that the property owner could not develop inside the buffer area. Gentle reader, this is very false.  The city fell short of finalizing the conservation area back in 2004 - as explained in the article a couple days ago. The committee was confused on where the nests were and even where the buffer areas were. 

Bryson said she had visited the planning department on Tuesday afternoon to see what development might be possible in the buffer area and planned to have a report for the committee next month.   Bryson reiterated to the committee that the $4 million of funds freed up by the cancellation of the over-water walkway were now earmarked for the GP industrial area and not available for acquisition of land. 

I was the only guest there to speak. There were two students attending on assignment to watch a public meeting. The committee started 10 minutes late after they waited for a quorum - but only 5 of 11 committee members showed up. On the agenda was approval of the March and May minutes - which could not be done because there was no quorum. Interestingly, the March and May agendas were never posted to the city website. See screen shot below.

It became very clear that there will be no action by the Greenways committee this summer. The next step is to see what the city council does this next Monday, June 6.  The council can act on their own without permission from Greenways or the Parks Department. I will attend to speak during comments. Hope others will join me. The herons need human advocates.

Below posted 3pm Thursday, June 2

This evening, Tuesday, June 2, at 7 pm, the Greenways Advisory Committee will meet at the Bellingham Municipal Court Building.  On the agenda is basically one item - an executive session and followup public vote on a land acquistion issue. You can bet your bippy they are reconsidering their May resolution to purchase the buffer woods by the heron colony.

The meeting is at the Bellingham Municipal Court Building, 625 Halleck Street, Bellingham, WA (for those who use their smart phone for navigation) 

Remarkably, the mayor's office and the parks department are apparently against the purchase of the buffer woods with Greenways funds. Leslie Bryson, the new parks director appointed by Mayor Kelli, told me directly that the funds freed up by the cancelling of the over-water walkway project are ear marked for cleanup and development at the old Georgia Pacific site - and not available for any land acquisitions. Leslie is scheduled to attend tonight's meeting. 

It goes without saying, but I will say it. If we value our Great Blue Herons along our shorelines, creeks and trails of Bellingham then we would be wise to provide the recommended buffer woods to their colony of nests. To their home. The experts on herons recommend it. Nothing is guaranteed, but the intelligent thing to do is protect the herons if we value them.  My writing about this will be ignored by the city departments. It is only if citizens, and prominent citizens, urge the council, mayor and parks to act that there is a chance.  

I will be attending and reporting on tonight's meeting. Let us hope it is not a reversal of the committee's May endorsement to use Greenways funds to purchase the critical buffer woods next to the Bellingham's only Great Blue Heron colony. 

Attached is the agenda for tonigh's meeting as a pdf file.

Posted agenda for June 2 Greenways Advisory Committee.

City website shows no agendas for the March and May meetings, and no minutes approved for this year.

Attached Files:

-> Agenda for Greenways Advisory Committee, June 2, 1016

Tim Paxton  //  Thu, Jun 02, 2016, 4:13 pm

If Greenway’s support to protect the Heron’s only Colony for 30+ miles is reversed under pressure from Mrs. Linville, that is tragic.

The City Council may as well wave goodbye to the Heron Colony, and also any hope of passing the next Greenways levy.

Bellingham Taxpayers aren’t so stupid as to see that the use of Greenways land acquisition funds are going toward slush fund ideas to only help politicians.  They won’t vote for this 2016 Greenways phake fund/Tax Increase if the Council won’t even support saving the Last Heron Colony.

While they are at it, perhaps Greenways Advisory Committee should vote to close down too? (If they cave to pressure from City Hall over the Heron Colony.)


Michael Lilliquist  //  Fri, Jun 03, 2016, 11:10 am

Parks Director Bryson told me last night that the true level of interest by the Greenways Advisory Commission to support acquisition was made more clear last night. As we heard it from the GAC members, they are supportive of using some Greenways funds to protect the colony, but not the full purchase price, something far less than the asking price.  A full outright purchase, therefore, would require financial partners or donations or negotiations, or perhaps an easement rather than an outright purchase.

She also told me that she will bring up the heron colony matter a next week’s Parks and Recreation Board meeting, on Wednesday morning. She said the usual process for any property considered by the GAC is through the Parks Board, and also with staff working on “due diligence” issues such as determining fair market value. Those steps have not occurred yet.

Personally, I believe the colony should be protected. Questions remain in my mind about the level of protection already offered, not by a conservation agreement (which apparently does not exist), but by critical areas regulations and required buffers. How much is already protected by those means, and not in need of public ownership? I have heard different views on this. State regulators recommend very large buffers, but these recommendations may not have the force of law. Nonetheless, if much of the land is undevelopable, that would change the picture.

One tricky part is that the City’s planning staff is already processing a subdivision application for this property, and that regulatory process needs to be walled-off from any parallel process of evaluating the acquisition of some or all of the property, subdivided or not, by means of purchase or conservation easement. The subdivision goes forward on its own merits, based on neutral application of existing rules and requirements.

Any protection efforts are not neutral, but would be positively driven by community values and our available resources.


Penny Tillson  //  Fri, Jun 03, 2016, 11:12 am

I am so sick already this season—sick of politicians, local and national, and their doofus (non)thinking capabilities.

Keep up your “taking over” attention to issues that matter to us all. How can we help you with “our” herons?

Penny Tillson


David Marshak  //  Fri, Jun 03, 2016, 1:26 pm

The headline that Mr. Servais posted here was never accurate. The Greenways Advisory Committee (GAC) at no time and in no way signaled any intent to reverse its recommendation from the May 4 meeting re enhanced protection of the heron colony.

This headline is a complete fabrication—a projection or a fantasy of some sort.

When the the Greenways Advisory Committee heard about the heron colony protection issue from Mr. Servais in May, we clearly told him that the GAC did not have the capacity to be the lead actor in protecting the heron colony. At the same time, the GAC members agreed with Mr. Servais about the importance of protecting the colony. The GAC passed a unanimous resolution recommending the use of the some Greenways levy funds to gain additional protection for the colony.  The City Council decides how to allocate and spend Greenways levy funds; the GAC can only recommend. We did so.

The GAC also suggested to Mr. Servais that he engage other local groups in his effort to protect the herons, since the Council would be more likely to act if there were a wider range of groups supporting the action. This recommendation, of course, is the most basic advice for influencing local government.

Mr. Servais’  claim in this post that “the committee showed a lack of knowledge about the situation” is also false. We knew a great deal about the situation, because Mr. Servais provided us with the information in May. Last night Mr. Servais also acted as if the GAC had never advised him to engage other groups in this effort. This was really hard to believe, since we told him this explicitly in May.

Mr. Servais seems to be quite confused about whether he is an advocate or a journalist. This post is certainly not good journalism; rather it contains multiple statements that are incorrect, and it casts aspersions on people without evidence.

Mr. Servais is not even able to list the number of GAC members accurately. There are 10, not 11. As noted above, he also fails to understand the role and authority of the GAC. He claims that “there will be no action by the Greenways committee this summer.” Mr. Servais fails to understand the obvious—the GAC has already acted to the extent that it has authority. The GAC has recommended that the City Council act in this matter, that the city expend some funds as needed.

All in all Mr. Servais’ post is biased, inaccurate, and more emotional than factual. This is not journalism; this is just some angry guy’s rant, a guy who does not even seem to understand the basics of how Bellingham’s city government functions.

David Marshak—and yes I am a member of the GAC


Michael Lilliquist  //  Fri, Jun 03, 2016, 1:35 pm

I’m still looking into what part of the property is already under some form of development restriction, for protection of the heron colony.  I am told that, for wildlife habitat areas, the buffer width is not written into the municipal code, but rather is determined in consultation with wildlife experts and state officials.

The pertinent sections of the municipal code for this part of the Critical Areas Ordiance (CAO) are BMC 16.55.470 -.480, and -490. They can be found at: + Link

Section 470(A)(1) seems to say that a protected wildlife habitat area exists by law for any “endangered, threatened, and sensitive species,” regardless of whether or not the City has adopted a habitat protection area—see section 470(B) in particular. If this is the case, then the City’s CAO applies to the heron colony, and buffers will be required.  The extent and location of buffers is not pre-determined, and is to be determined case-by-case based on best available science—see sections 490(C)(1) and 490(F).

My conclusion at this point is that the heron colony will, by law, be protected to a considerable extent—especially if the CAO and best available science are truly applied. If that is the case, then the question becomes:  Is that protection enough? Would the public, the GAC, and city council support using public funds to enhance that protection beyond the required level? Would private parties also be willing to contribute to enhanced protection?


John Servais  //  Sat, Jun 04, 2016, 10:33 am

David,

Well I wrote i would answer questions, but I do not want to get into a cat fight.  Lets see if I can do one and avoid the other.

You and I have been here before - several times over the past 7 years.  I think I understand your anger and perhaps I was too rough in my comments after that GAC meeting Thur night.  Indeed, the committee did hold firm to their resolution for the city to look at how this might be purchased. My apology for not more strongly noting that.

Thursday night, the parks director became aware that you folks on the committee were serious about learning what could be done to protect the heron nests.  In the month since your May resolution the parks had not done anything about your resolution - and that caused my concern.  The agenda for your meeting was an executive session to reconsider your resolution.  This agenda was prepared by the parks department, not by the Greenways committee, and was only posted a day before your meeting. I was informed of it by someone in city hall.  My headline and article that you object to came from that agenda of Thursday noon.

Well, 7 hours later at your meeting, that agenda was tossed and the executive session was cancelled. It is not a stretch to connect the dots here.  Parks cancelled the executive session after their intentions became known.  And for you - who probably did not see that original agenda - my headline appeared false. 

I remembered another time when this sort of scenario played out, and would like to invite you and any readers who are interested to review three articles.  In June, 2010, the city and the library board decided to close the Fairhaven library - and went about it in a very quiet manner.  My articles first exposed the plan and then reported on the reversal - and denial they ever intended to close the library. I was called a liar by some library board members and most would not talk to me.  You, David, wrote me: “John, Thank you very much for alerting us to the Library Board’s intentions last week. Best wishes, David”. See the June 8, 14 and 16 articles.  NWCitizen made it a public issue and Bellingham residents stopped the library closure.

+ Link

Indeed, it seems that now the Parks Department is taking seriously your resolution of May 5.  The important issue is doing our best as a community to provide the herons with a secure home - if we value the herons in our community.  Yes, the Greenways committee did stand by its May resolution.  There is some question of exactly what that resolution is - and regardless, hopefully the parks department will now work towards looking into the heron colony and what is needed in a serious manner.

I will continue to report on and advocate for the buffer woods by our only Bellingham Great Blue Heron colony.  Citizen journalism, by definition, allows me to use all my rights as a citizen while still writing on the news. 

A final note.  There are 11 members on the committee. Here is the city website page with the list of the members. 

+ Link

Time is of the essence.  We need action by the council and parks department if we are to protect the heron colony as the experts advise us to.  If we do not act, then the land will be developed and we will be left with a much less satisfactory 150 foot buffer.  It is our choice as a community.  All I can do is write about it and, hopefully like other residents, lobby our city council to take action.


David Marshak  //  Sun, Jun 05, 2016, 8:17 pm

Thanks for the correction re the number of GAC members. I neglected to count Roger.

Otherwise, you fail to admit that you projected and/or imagined a series of events and decisions that never happened. None of what you claim to be logical assumptions about GAC members or the GAC agenda are factual; these are your projections or assumptions.

This goes to the core of your irresponsible behavior in publishing assertions that are false.

Journalists don’t “connect the dots.” Journalists have evidence and sources; they don’t imagine or project or hallucinate.

Your headline did not “appear false.” It was false. And of course I saw the original agenda.

The bottom line, John, is that you had no idea what you were talking about in this post, since all of this activity was going on in your head, not in the real world.

Indeed you are still in denial about all of this, as is reflected in your previous post.

You wrote to that you want to “Take no prisoners.  Expose the charades.  Name the imbecile collaborators in city staff maneuvers.” I think this says all anyone needs to know about your motivations.


John Servais  //  Mon, Jun 06, 2016, 8:41 am

David

Let me go over your primary assertion of my being wrong about the agenda. The issue is the heron colony buffer woods and I will touch on that also.

I knew from a very well placed and reliable city hall insider that the executive session would be used to suggest the GAC modify their May resolution.  The truth of this was partially born out when the parks director said at your meeting that she learned late afternoon - just a few hours before your meeting - from the city attorney that she could discuss the heron buffer land acquisition in an open meeting. This was her explanation for the revised agenda cancelling the executive session. This confirms the subject of the proposed executive session.  The agenda also listed a vote after the executive meeting - if necessary.  This logically suggest a modification of the May resolution. 

There are now 3 and possibly 4 versions of the May resolution.  Unfortunately, there is no audio record of the meeting.  This is sadly true of most committees and commissions for the city of Bellingham. We are left to argue what actually transpired at the meeting.  For an open and transparent public process there should be audio recordings of all meetings.

You chastise my reporting and assumptions and lack of references.  Reporting is not a research paper. Trust is built up over time and no reporting could be of value without inside sources. I have talked to the mayor, parks staff,  GAC members, property owners, heron experts, and even the parks director.  I have researched this since last July and intended to post a wake up article in March.  But then it appeared the city might actually work with the property owners - and I waited, hoping to post an article praising the city for acting.  Lo, I was simply suckered along for two months.  I wish I had started writing about this issue months ago. 

The Herald often simply reports by being friendly to government sources - as we can see in today’s article on the planned Options High School.  The reporter only presents the statements of the Bellingham School District administrator in charge of the project.  Of course he pooh poohs the issues raised by neighbors.  But the article - and the administrator - failed to note the Hearing Examiner just last week ruled against the school district on their permit applications.  They must go through their public hearing process again.  Construction will not start this month, contrary to what this morning’s article says. I think we do better here.

At NWCitizen, we try to write and expose government shenanigans and deceptions. We are not friendly to city departments and commissions.  Indeed, we take a critical approach and try to inform readers on what is actually happening.  Just as I did in June 2010 on the nefarious city process to try and close the Fairhaven Library - and which you complimented me for.  And on many other issues for over 20 years now.  In closing, the journalist’s job is to connect the dots. Its what we do.


Mike Rostron  //  Mon, Jun 06, 2016, 12:47 pm

More generally, you are correct with your journalism comments, John. No one—whether boss, government, friends, foes, or critics has the right to determine how or what you report. They certainly have the right—as many have exercised here now and in the past—to oppose and correct you as they desire and see fit, but as an independent journalist YOU define your role. I for one commend your efforts. Please continue to connect those dots!


John Servais  //  Mon, Jun 06, 2016, 5:51 pm

Mike, thanks.  You put it better than I did.  We all have the right to exercise all of our constitutional rights.  My effort here is to post articles on issues ignored by other media and to allow citizens to comment as they wish.  It is dialog and we inform each other.


Greenways may reverse heron colony buffer purchase this evening

The Greenways Advisory Committee meets this evening and may reverse their May decision to purchase the heron colony buffer woods.

John Servais
Fri, Jun 03, 2016, 12:29 am
10 comments; last on Jun 07, 2016

We need to protect our Great Blue Heron colony

Bellingham's only heron colony needs forested buffer - and the land owner is willing to sell. Greenways has voted to buy it, but our city council must act.

John Servais
Tue, May 31, 2016, 9:51 pm
5 comments; last on Jun 01, 2016


Proposed over-water walkway is dead

The planned concrete walkway from Boulevard Park to the Cornwall landfill, using millions in Greenway funds, has been abandoned by Bellingham. We again thank the Lummi.

John Servais
Sat, May 21, 2016, 4:32 pm
11 comments; last on May 26, 2016

BNSF: A casual approach to railroad safety

At Clayton Beach, we have tracked increasing erosion under railroad tracks and written to the railroads and federal inspectors. To no avail.

John Servais
Mon, Apr 04, 2016, 8:17 pm
2 comments; last on Apr 05, 2016

Anchor-chain activists face hefty fines

The Coast Guard has levied $30,000 in fines on two Bellingham climate activists. They will fight to have the fines dropped.

Ralph Schwartz
Thu, Feb 18, 2016, 5:01 am
16 comments; last on Feb 22, 2016

Bye Bye

Shell Polar Pioneer floating oil drill rig left the Pacific Northwest for Norway today. Nice holiday gift for all of us.

John Servais
Fri, Dec 25, 2015, 11:31 am
2 comments; last on Dec 25, 2015

A Learning Moment - Hopefully

Beware walking RR tracks on the Fairhaven waterfront in the event of unexpected encounter with a high speed train

John Servais
Sun, Sep 13, 2015, 9:42 am
2 comments; last on Sep 18, 2015

Chiara D’Angelo comes down from anchor chain

Young Chiara spent 3 nights hanging from the anchor chain of Shell Oil's Arctic Challenger as a protest to arctic oil drilling.

John Servais
Mon, May 25, 2015, 8:17 pm
0 comments

A Perspective on Port Politics

The port's latest bone-headed deal calls for the good citizens of Whatcom County to consider the options...unless we're enjoying our Groundhog Day.

John Servais
Sat, Apr 04, 2015, 1:15 pm
3 comments; last on Apr 07, 2015

Port Gives Away Our Bellingham Waterfront

Port of Bellingham today sold out our public waterfront to a foreign shell company formed 6 days ago. Sold it cheap and with a screwy arrangement.

John Servais
Wed, Apr 01, 2015, 12:20 am
32 comments; last on Apr 05, 2015

Robyn du Pre` Has Passed On

Add your thoughts and remembrances. Robyn du Pre` was a stalwart and true environmental advocate for Bellingham and Whatcom County. She died this week.

John Servais
Thu, Mar 12, 2015, 1:06 pm
9 comments; last on Mar 23, 2015

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Threatened

The public needs to support city council and request that a waterfront habitat assessment include terrestrial species and habitat connectivity.

Wendy Harris
Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 11:43 am
0 comments

Reid Boiler Works Burns Down

The old empty Reid Boiler Works industrial building in Fairhaven burned to the ground Saturday night.

John Servais
Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 10:13 am
0 comments

Port’s Alternative Marina Analysis a Scam

Do we actually need to say that we, as citizens, want accurate information from government officials?

Guest writer
Tue, Jan 14, 2014, 3:19 pm
1 comments; last on Jan 14, 2014

Port Memo Addresses Marina Fraud Allegations

A Port of Bellingham internal memo tries, but fails, to justify changes in cost estimates for alternative marina sites.

Wendy Harris
Fri, Dec 20, 2013, 4:56 pm
5 comments; last on Dec 22, 2013

On Monday, City Council Votes “third and final” Approval of Waterfront Plan

Local activist calls on Bellingham City Council to table the unpopular waterfront plans and engage in meaningful public process

Wendy Harris
Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 1:33 pm
2 comments; last on Dec 08, 2013

Video Exposes City Council Dysfunction on Waterfront Plan

The Political Junkie has posted a 3 minute video showing Bellingham City Council members explaining their idiocy for all of us to watch.

John Servais
Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 12:58 pm
2 comments; last on Dec 06, 2013

Cascadia Weekly Blasts Waterfront Plan

Bellingham City Council and Port of Bellingham finalize the waterfront plan. In his weekly Gristle, Tim Johnson blasts the corrupt public process.

John Servais
Wed, Dec 04, 2013, 11:53 am
4 comments; last on Dec 05, 2013

Boulevard Park Reopens

Beach reconstruction is done at Boulevard Park on the Bellingham waterfront. Paths along shore are again open - and it looks good.

John Servais
Sat, Oct 26, 2013, 8:36 pm
6 comments; last on Nov 02, 2013

Treaty Rights and Public Rights Ignored In Overwater Walkway

The city staff considers the overwater walkway a done deal before official approval or resolution of treaty right conflicts

Wendy Harris
Tue, Oct 08, 2013, 3:22 pm
4 comments; last on Oct 16, 2013

Wildlife Impacts Missing In COB Waterfront District EIS

The city and port have not addressed wildlife impacts from waterfront development and this should be done before a waterfront plan is enacted.

Wendy Harris
Sat, Sep 28, 2013, 6:05 pm
0 comments

Sen. Doug Ericksen Co-opts rather than Cooperate

Riley Sweeney examines Sen. Ericksen's legislative methods

Riley Sweeney
Fri, Jun 28, 2013, 7:29 am
0 comments

Waterfront “Planned Action Ordinance” Limits Restoration and Public Input

The City Planning Department has included a technical document in the waterfront proposal without disclosing important impacts.

Wendy Harris
Tue, Mar 26, 2013, 9:59 pm
1 comments; last on Mar 30, 2013

Valuable Article in the Whatcom Watch

Wendy Harris writes about the proposed $8 million concrete bridge along the Bellingham waterfront - using Greenways funds to build.

John Servais
Sun, Mar 17, 2013, 9:42 pm
3 comments; last on Mar 20, 2013

Waterfront EIS Revised Without Public Process

An "Updated Preferred Alternative" reduces the number of waterfront jobs and expands the boundary of the waterfront district.

Wendy Harris
Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 10:40 pm
0 comments

Efforts to save the Granary building

Graphics projected on building each night in effort to bring attention to threatened building

John Servais
Sat, Aug 04, 2012, 12:18 am
3 comments; last on Aug 11, 2012

Motivated Reasoning Yields Useless Planning

Where a planning staff desire for view corridors in the Fairhaven plan yields a view corridor that does nothing for views.

John Servais
Mon, Jul 23, 2012, 7:05 pm
1 comments; last on Jul 25, 2012

Scott Walker asks for Charlie Sheldon’s resignation

Bellingham Port Commissioner Scott Walker motioned for the port to ask Executive Director Charlie Sheldon to resign.

John Servais
Wed, Oct 19, 2011, 1:13 am
5 comments; last on Oct 20, 2011

From the Political Junkie: A Petree-Eye View of Downtown

Riley interviews Clayton Petree about his view of Downtown Bellingham

Riley Sweeney
Tue, Aug 09, 2011, 5:44 pm
6 comments; last on Aug 12, 2011

Problems with SEPA review of Cornwall Landfill

Time is running out for public comment on the Port's proposal to use toxic waste as a cap at waterfront re-development site.

Wendy Harris
Thu, Jun 23, 2011, 8:30 am
5 comments; last on Jul 02, 2011

Port punts on commercial moorage rates

Guest writer Doug Karlberg follows up with report from Tuesday's Port Commission meeting

Guest writer
Thu, Feb 17, 2011, 7:30 pm
7 comments; last on Feb 20, 2011

Showdown at the Port of Bellingham

Why the price of moorage matters to all Whatcom County. A guest article by Doug Karlberg.

Guest writer
Mon, Feb 14, 2011, 7:35 pm
5 comments; last on Jun 30, 2011

Is Boulevard Park/Cornwall Landfill Overwater Walkway A Toxic Trail?

Wendy Harris writes about a multi million dollar planned city of Bellingham project.

Guest writer
Wed, Dec 15, 2010, 10:07 pm
9 comments; last on Dec 18, 2010

Bellingham! It’s The Mercury!

Maybe NOAA knows the truth about our waterfront. Our Port of Bellingham pretends it is not toxic. But it is criminally toxic.

Kamalla Rose Kaur
Wed, Mar 10, 2010, 9:42 pm
2 comments; last on Mar 16, 2010

The Way I See It - Los Angeles Resurrected


I’ve been to Los Angeles many times. I even remember the Red and Yellow electric street cars that served the city from after World War II until…

Ham Hayes
Wed, Nov 25, 2009, 9:00 am
0 comments

The Port of Chmelik

Seems like the offices of Frank Chmelik, the attorney for the Port of Bellingham, are becoming our defacto Port offices. Instead of conferences and meetings at the Port,…

John Servais
Tue, Nov 24, 2009, 6:12 am
2 comments; last on Nov 25, 2009

The Mayor’s Statement in the Herald

Dan Pike's guest editorial in Sunday's Herald is a direct result of an article on NwCitizen earlier this week. Indeed, on Wednesday, after the article had only been…

John Servais
Sun, Apr 26, 2009, 12:19 pm
3 comments; last on May 21, 2009

Port of Bellingham gave millions to AIG

We local taxpayers have contributed $20 million of our own tax dollars to AIG's executives. Remember? A couple years ago the Port bought an insurance policy from AIG…

John Servais
Sat, Mar 21, 2009, 10:19 am
3 comments; last on Mar 23, 2009

Fairhaven Shipyard to gain larger drydock

Coming to our Fairhaven waterfront - this magnificent floating drydock. The above aerial photo is of the Fairhaven Shipyard with the new drydock placed as a computer image…

John Servais
Fri, Jan 02, 2009, 7:23 pm
1 comments; last on Jan 03, 2009

New Library ideas

Tired of looking at a photo of geese when you check here? So am I. We have nine writers for this site but it has been rather slack…

John Servais
Wed, Jun 25, 2008, 5:20 pm
10 comments; last on Aug 04, 2008

What you can’t see, won’t kill ya - a lesson in TBL

TBL, or Triple Bottom Line, is a nifty concept that says we want to be evaluating and measuring projects on the basis not only of economic, but environmental…

Ham Hayes
Fri, Feb 22, 2008, 1:24 pm
5 comments; last on Feb 25, 2008

When Is Less More?

When Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) are prepared, more than one development model might be evaluated. But a no-action alternative is always required as a baseline reference. Convention

Tip Johnson
Sat, Feb 02, 2008, 4:55 pm
0 comments

Public hearing started well after 9 pm

It is not bad enough that the city council schedules the public hearing on our future Shoreline Master Plan for the middle of July - a plan many…

Site Management
Tue, Jul 17, 2007, 5:33 pm
0 comments

Forums and blogging and pits, oh my!

The Herald does not even follow its own mandates. On Sunday, the editorial said the candidates "...must address 6 big issues." Must. Then they sent out their own…

Site Management
Thu, Jul 12, 2007, 5:59 pm
0 comments

Only a government agency would do this.

The Herald ran an ad for the State Department of Ecology informing us of the web site where we could find the Draft Consent Decree for our waterfront…

Site Management
Mon, Jul 09, 2007, 6:17 pm
0 comments

Last Chance - Steal this Waterfront!

In a Bellingham Herald article dated May 4, Interim Mayor Tim Douglas "said it's

Tip Johnson
Thu, May 10, 2007, 4:51 pm
0 comments

The Port’s Plan to Poison

Why the Log Pond cap won't work

An article in a recent Bellingham Business Journal detailed the debate over whether the toxic muck in the Whatcom Waterway ought to…

Tip Johnson
Thu, Apr 26, 2007, 12:02 pm
0 comments

The So-called News

Independent media? Freedom of the press? Peoples friend, tyrants foe? It was a good idea while it lasted, educating the electorate and forming a mainstay of our democracy.…

Tip Johnson
Mon, Apr 23, 2007, 4:24 pm
0 comments

Poisoning the Public - A treacherous legacy

According to the Bellingham Herald, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources has recently approved leaving tons of mercury buried in Bellingham Bay. The documents are not yet…

Tip Johnson
Wed, Apr 18, 2007, 4:49 pm
0 comments

Your Waterfront - Up for grabs

New Whatcom Redevelopment Project - The City and Port of Bellingham will hold public information a meeting. Bellingham Cruise Terminal. 355 Harris Ave., Bellingham. WA Times: 6:00 PM.

Also,…

Tip Johnson
Wed, Apr 18, 2007, 4:34 pm
0 comments

Response to Bellingham Herald editorial

Today's Bellingham Herald editorial invites an answer. The editorial is good in that it reflects on past bad practices, like allowing GP to dump mercury into Bellingham Bay,…

John Servais
Thu, Jan 25, 2007, 6:18 pm
0 comments

Moving Target

One of the more momentous public hearings in Bellingham's history appears to be ready to pass with more than the ordinary confusion. We wrote about some of the…

Tip Johnson
Mon, Dec 11, 2006, 3:32 pm
0 comments

Public meeting & hearing rescheduled

Notice:

Relative to the last post:

Ecology has rescheduled the public meeting for:
December 7th, 6:30 p.m. ñ 8:30 p.m., Bellingham Cruise Terminal, 355 Harris Avenue, Bell

John Servais
Thu, Nov 30, 2006, 2:56 pm
0 comments

Public Process - Lots of it (kind of),

or I lied (sort of!)

In the previous post I complained that the biggest rip-off in Whatcom County history was happening without even being discussed or making it into…

Tip Johnson
Mon, Nov 27, 2006, 6:15 pm
0 comments

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

The good? We are no longer spewing forty+ pounds of mercury vapor every day into the local atmosphere. We are no longer dumping 20 to 40 tons of…

Tip Johnson
Sun, Nov 26, 2006, 5:21 pm
0 comments

Traffic and Western Washington University

If WWU gets their way, $20 million in state taxes will be spent on jack-hammering out good roads and building new ones a hundred yards away. No increase…

John Servais
Mon, Mar 01, 2004, 8:20 pm
0 comments

The Port Commissioner campaign is getting hot

Ginny Benton, seeking her third term as commissioner, stated this evening at the Rome Grange that she will not respond to the "mud slinging" being done against her.…

John Servais
Wed, Aug 27, 2003, 4:57 pm
0 comments

Web site to check out

Waterfront Futures for Bellingham - nothing here. This is one of those processes t

John Servais
Mon, May 12, 2003, 7:08 pm
0 comments

Tis time to focus on local issues

Elections this fall could bring positive change to Whatcom County and Bellingham. In particular, we need a new Mayor and we need a new Port Commissioner. The challenge…

John Servais
Thu, May 01, 2003, 7:40 pm
0 comments

 

We Thank Our Sponsors

Click to See All Sponsors

About NWCitizen

Donations maintain site

Our writers
Thru the years

Election Links

Jeff Strung / WA Auditor

Mike LaPointe / US Congress

League of Women Voters

Calendar of Events

Home page
Videos of Districting Committee

Local Online News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Business Journal
Bham Politics & Econ
Cascadia Weekly
Coal Stop
Ferndale Record
KGMI
KPLU fm radio
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
Noisy Waters
Northern Light
Seattle Times
Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut C. Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Powder River Basin R. C.
RE Sources
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice

Our Governments

- Whatcom County

Bellingham
Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US House
US Senate
US Supreme Court
US The White House
WA State
Whatcom COG

NWCitizen 1995-2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
EPIC World Photos
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That?

Local Leisure

Adventures NW

Bellingham Wins
Entertainment NNW
Recreation Northwest

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Change The Mascot
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
Edge of Sports
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project
Irish Times
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
TED
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
Vox
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register

Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Jack Petree
MikeatthePort
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman
Protect Bellingham Parks
Sweeney Politics
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders