Whatcom Co.: Voting and Vote-Counting with Integrity

Permalink +

Sun, Nov 08, 2015, 9:25 pm  //  Guest writer

Ballots are placed in random batches in trays, the trays logged and then securely stored.

This guest article is a group effort of the 15-year-old non-partisan "Whatcom Fair Voting" group. Comments to the article can be addressed to Marian Beddill.

- - - - 

Trustworthy elections require a voting system with solid integrity, protected from tampering or corruption of the tallies of votes cast. This review does not deal with WHO can cast a ballot (registration issues, etc.) – which is a valid concern. This analysis starts at the point where a paper ballot is received in the elections system from a drop-box or postal delivery to the auditor’s office.

Whatcom County in Washington state has a vote counting system that meets a strongly procedural, high integrity standard of checks and balances.

We have official “observers,” usually representing the political parties and other distinct interest groups like the League of Women Voters, but anyone may take a brief training by the elections staff, sign an oath to do the task, and be permitted to “observe.” These observers are allowed in the rooms where any of the ballot and vote management activities are taking place. They are not allowed to touch any materials and may only ask questions of a supervisor.

The general sequential process begins when the ballots are mailed to voters. The voter marks their paper ballot with an inked line in the read-area for their intended votes, puts it into the secrecy envelope, and puts the secrecy envelope containing the ballot into a slightly larger outer envelope. The voter signs his or her name on the back flap of the outer envelope.  They then either mail the ballot or deposit it in a drop-box at one of the locations established and advertised by the auditor’s office.

Two staff members from the auditor’s office regularly gather the envelopes containing the ballots from the official drop-boxes and the U.S. Post Office.  Once in the office, they are placed in random batches of about a hundred ballots and each batch is put into a large plastic tray. Each tray has a unique identification number that is noted on a log-sheet created for each batch. The trays and ballots - pictured above - are then stored in a safe.  

The auditor’s office has a database with a copy of every voter’s signature. Before the ballots are removed from their return-envelopes, they are processed by people trained to compare the signature on the still-sealed outer envelope against the signature on record. For the purposes of this discussion of integrity, we now know that the signature has been visually verified and declared to be from a registered voter. This is registered in the database so only one ballot from that voter will be processed.

In order to process the ballots, they need to be removed from the outer and secrecy envelopes and separated. At this point, the ballot cannot be identified as to which voter cast it.

To pre-determine that the ballots are readable by the scanners, every ballot is visually inspected and reviewed by staffers. Any marks other than a proper vote requires the ballot to be duplicated by two staff members, one marking, the other checking. Log sheets are kept and signed by both staff members, and the voter-marked ballots are moved to a different storage place. Both log-sheets are numbered for cross-referencing so at any time the voter-marked ballots may be retrieved for verification.


Washington state law requires effort be made to count the vote according to “voter intent,” and there are 24 different “voter intent” scenarios which are recognized as guides for the staff. So, there is an initial visual inspection of every ballot and where irregular marks are seen, the ballot is duplicated following that guide. In instances where a voter’s intent cannot be determined, a duplicate ballot is made, leaving out that item.  The same will happen if the computer-scanner spots an irregularity – the ballot is removed and a duplicate made and re-inserted in the process.


Ballots and their digital twins are handled and stored in “batches,” arbitrary bunches of about 100 ballots placed and managed together. Several batches may be placed in a storage box and a unique number is assigned to each batch and box. All activities for managing the ballots are registered in a logging-system. If ballots are withdrawn from a batch for some kind of verification, they are re-registered in a new batch and the record of the batch they were taken from is edited to show the reduced count. Every movement is checked by staff and a supervisor, and signed by each. The boxed batches are kept in a secured room except when being processed.


Ah!  The processing! 

The computer system is in a locked and secure room. The industrial-quality, high-speed scanners make and save a digital copy of the votes that were marked on the paper ballot by the voter. They are directly connected to the processing computers, and it takes only seconds to read a batch.

At predetermined and announced times, so that observers may be present, the ballots in batches are ‘read’ into the computer system by a high-speed scanner, one batch at a time. The batch numbers are registered on the log sheets of each scanner.  (see scanner photo below article)

For security, the scanners and computers that read the ballots, count the votes and store that information, have NO communication connection to the outside world. Data cannot be sent directly to or from these computers and they have features that would block any attempt to send/receive information through electric power lines.  Programs are loaded onto the computers from certified copies on digital media.

All vote-total digital output from these computers is transferred out ONLY by manual transport of a removable external disc drive. The data is copied onto such a disc, which is carried by two people, for integrity, to an administrative room to be incorporated into the permanent storage systems. It’s called a “sneaker-net,” referring to their shoes. For verification, those vote totals are also printed in both locations, the computer room before they go out and again in the administrative office, so there can be a double-check. Then the results will be made ready to go public. But wait; there is another step! 


The computerized results are subjected to a final inspection - a manual double-check/mini-audit.

A prime function of the observers is to randomly select batches for integrity verification. While the paper-ballot batches are being scan-read by the computer system, the observers designate random batches to be verified by a hand-count. Those batches are sealed in special boxes, tagged, registered, and stored in a separate place. The double-check hand-count usually takes place the following morning and any observers may be present.

The randomly selected batches of paper ballots are taken to a room, opened by staff and selected races are hand-counted; they are counted a second time by another team. If the two hand counts agree, the computerized counts, which were printed but not disclosed, are announced for the first time. This basic, independent double check allows everyone to know whether the computer-count numbers match the hand-counts – or are different.

If the vote-tally numbers differ between the computer-count and the hand-count, an investigation is started right then, in the same room. The paper ballots are scrutinized for any irregularity that may have been understood one way by the computer system and another way by the staff. The most common reason for a difference has been that a pen-mark by the voter on a paper ballot wasn’t dark enough – which led the staff to see it as “a vote,” but the more-sensitive computer-system to call it “a non-vote – a blank.”

When managers and staff find such a ballot, it is removed from the batch. Once a substitute ballot has been duplicated to coincide with the presumed voter-intent, it will be re-inserted into the batch. That “repaired” batch is then again run through the scanner/computer system, and the new results are brought to the review team while public observers are still there. Over about a dozen years, almost without exception, the computer tally including the properly marked vote has matched the hand count first found by the verify-staff. No errors, and no corruption.

The batches of paper ballots are then archived, under a management system of coded identification of each batch.


Computer software is a fundamental part of the system and the programs could be subject to corruption. Federal and state law requires that all such systems be reviewed and certified as reliable and free of features that could corrupt the reported vote-tallies. Our system in Whatcom County met that certification requirement when it was purchased. 

But all such systems are subject to eventual failure so there must be new, certified management programs to replace them. We believe any new equipment, both hardware and software, MUST be carefully reviewed and found reliable – i.e. certified.

Unfortunately, the federal office tasked with doing this certification had nearly drifted out of existence. It has recently been re-activated and new programs are now beginning to obtain federal certification. Hopefully, they will be available to states and counties in the near future.

But Washington state’s certification process is still idle. The public needs to push to re-start our efforts to adequately review new computer systems. Producing Certification Reports on them will allow us to begin acquiring them. Certification MUST be done before our “old” systems begin to fail, which some experts suggest will be within the next three years.


In order to retain the integrity of our voting system, votes must be delivered to the elections office marked on paper ballots by the voters. We currently have the ability to use those paper ballots to do hand-counts to double-check the machine counts. The paper ballot is physical, thus verifiable, whereas electronic records are not. Other than a few exceptions for special cases such as military voters overseas, or voters who are blind or have other disabilities, we must say no to electronic/digital voting. No touchscreen voting. No internet voting. All those systems can be hacked and corrupted. With the process steps outlined above, we can have confidence that our votes are correctly counted and reported. 


Well, yes. There are the questions of who may have a ballot and who will mark it. But those are for another report.

                                           = = = =

This is a public education article by Whatcom Fair Voting, which has been in operation for over a decade.

Whatcom Fair Voting (WFV) is a non-partisan ad-hoc grassroots citizen’s group working to promote electoral process integrity by:

-      Researching voting improvements
-      Encouraging full citizen participation
-      Informing the public and elected officials on voting issues
-      Supporting safeguards to ensure fair & accurate voting, accountability & process transparency
-      Monitoring elections legislation

One of the three computer scanners.

Wynne Lee  //  Tue, Nov 10, 2015, 2:37 pm

Thanks so much for writing and posting this, Marion. Kudos to you and all the other great citizens who’ve worked so hard to ensure the integrity of the voting process in Whatcom County. It may not be perfect, but it’s light years ahead of so many other places.  I’ve sent the link on, including posting it on FB.

Marian Beddill  //  Fri, Nov 13, 2015, 10:36 pm

We produced a graphic operations chart for the entire ballot management system, of which this article is a part.
You may see that chart at the website:
  NoLeakyBuckets.org ;
+ Link ;

Whatcom Co.: Voting and Vote-Counting with Integrity

Sun, Nov 08, 2015, 9:25 pm  //  Guest writer

An overview of Whatcom County's method of processing ballots and counting votes.

2 comments; last on Nov 14, 2015

Final Election Returns: Jail Tax Rejected

Fri, Nov 06, 2015, 4:37 pm  //  John Servais

Satpal Sidhu wins council seat. Virtually all the ballots are now counted. Challenges and a few special are left.

1 comments; last on Nov 06, 2015

Thursday Voting Update

Thu, Nov 05, 2015, 9:17 pm  //  John Servais

Jail sales tax is being rejected - and the NO vote is increasing. Sidhu - Kerschner still undecided. Props 2, 3, 9 and 10 all should pass.

1 comments; last on Nov 06, 2015

Wednesday Vote Changes

Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 6:45 pm  //  John Servais

Second tally of 10,000 more ballots is in. Jail sales tax is now being rejected. Probably 15,000 or more ballots to go.

2 comments; last on Nov 05, 2015

Important Election Issues Undecided

Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 12:05 am  //  John Servais

The first returns - probably 60% of the final vote - shows contradictory propositions passing and most candidate races decided.

7 comments; last on Nov 04, 2015

More on Propositions 1 and 9

Sun, Nov 01, 2015, 9:31 am  //  John Servais

Where more substantial evidence is presented against proposition 9 - and why you should vote REJECTED on it.

24 comments; last on Nov 04, 2015

NWCitizen Publisher’s Voting Choices

Sat, Oct 31, 2015, 2:02 am  //  John Servais

As an independent citizen and political junkie, here is how I am voting - with brief reasons for my choices.

8 comments; last on Nov 03, 2015

Dwindling Information Makes Voters Susceptible to Spin

Mon, Oct 26, 2015, 11:39 pm  //  Whatcom Citizen

A perspective on the our changing news system, the consequences, and the challenges for the future. With a suggestion of the solution.

5 comments; last on Oct 28, 2015

Louws Regrets Jail Mailer

Tue, Oct 20, 2015, 9:25 am  //  John Servais

County Executive - and candidate for reelection -Jack Louws has written county officials with his regrets over jail mailer.

8 comments; last on Oct 24, 2015

Let’s not squander the next 30 years

Sun, Oct 18, 2015, 11:37 am  //  John Servais

The jail sales tax proposition is a road to perdition for our county. It is a waste and has been deceptively promoted.

4 comments; last on Oct 20, 2015

Whatcom Conservation District Elections

Sun, Aug 09, 2015, 10:52 am  //  Guest writer

Barbara Perry has been researching the secretive election processes of the Whatcom Conservation District. Really secretive. Probably fraudulent.

1 comments; last on Aug 12, 2015

Election Results - Aug 4 Primary

Tue, Aug 04, 2015, 7:09 pm  //  John Servais

9:52 - final post for tonight. A running blog about the election results on this August evening. Feel free to comment.

8 comments; last on Aug 06, 2015

Whatcom County Council adds ballot measure

Wed, Jul 08, 2015, 8:27 am  //  John Servais

Last minute political maneuvering by liberal council seeks to counter conservative review commission ballot proposals.

1 comments; last on Aug 12, 2015

Joy Gilfilen Declares for County Executive

Mon, May 18, 2015, 10:17 pm  //  John Servais

Joy Gilfilen is challenging incumbent Jack Louws for County Executive.

4 comments; last on May 20, 2015

85 County Single Candidate Elections

Fri, May 15, 2015, 5:10 pm  //  John Servais

Running update of who is filing for office in Whatcom County. Posts during day Friday and final update Friday evening.

4 comments; last on May 17, 2015

A Perspective on Port Politics

Sat, Apr 04, 2015, 12:15 pm  //  John Servais

The port's latest bone-headed deal calls for the good citizens of Whatcom County to consider the options...unless we're enjoying our Groundhog Day.

3 comments; last on Apr 07, 2015

How the Party Treats Jeb and Hillary Tells You Everything

Thu, Feb 26, 2015, 9:39 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley shares some insight into the national political parties

5 comments; last on Mar 09, 2015

The Hidden Election

Mon, Feb 02, 2015, 8:34 am  //  Guest writer

No ballot mailed to you. You must request a ballot for voting in the Whatcom Conservation District election. Deadline to apply is Feb 9. By Barbara Perry


Riley’s Top 5 Whatcom Political Stories of 2014

Wed, Dec 24, 2014, 12:23 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

The Herald gave us their top 10 stories, Riley gives you his top 5


Where are the persuadable voters in the 42nd District?

Sat, Nov 22, 2014, 2:48 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley dives into the data with precinct maps and historical perspectives


Doug Ericksen’s Tax Lien

Tue, Nov 04, 2014, 11:28 am  //  John Servais

While smearing Seth Fleetwood over a common tax arrangement, we discover Doug Ericksen also has a benign tax lien - one he denied.

6 comments; last on Nov 11, 2014

A Recent GOP History in Not-So-Terse-Verse

Mon, Nov 03, 2014, 7:14 pm  //  Richard Lewis

Poet Richard Lewis weighs in on the Tea Party values


Election Recommendations

Thu, Oct 30, 2014, 1:18 am  //  John Servais

A link to Riley's Political Junkie for excellent recommendations - and a few thoughts of my own.

1 comments; last on Oct 30, 2014

Tune in TONIGHT for Political Comedy

Tue, Oct 14, 2014, 5:36 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley does a local political comedy show

1 comments; last on Oct 15, 2014

Few Surprises at the Tea Party Debate

Thu, Oct 02, 2014, 1:33 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley files a full report of the Tea Party debate for State Leg candidates

1 comments; last on Oct 04, 2014

Satpal Sidhu, Candidate for State Representative, 42nd District

Tue, Sep 30, 2014, 7:00 am  //  Guest writer

Wherein a Fulbright scholar, professional engineer and successful business owner files for public office

4 comments; last on Oct 02, 2014

Who Will Be Appointed to Lehman’s City Council Seat?

Tue, Sep 09, 2014, 7:21 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley and John share the short list of who might replace Cathy Lehman on the Bellingham city council on January 5.

8 comments; last on Sep 10, 2014

Fleetwood versus Ericksen: What Happened in Round One?

Tue, Aug 12, 2014, 9:52 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Some Context for the Primary Results


Final Updated Election Results

Fri, Aug 08, 2014, 9:10 am  //  John Servais

Updated Wed evening. The Tuesday evening 8:20 pm Auditor report on the election is in.

5 comments; last on Aug 08, 2014

Northwest Citizen Releases Polling of Whatcom Voters

Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 10:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Northwest Citizen has conducted a phone poll of likely voters, with some surprising results!

9 comments; last on Jul 29, 2014

Who Filed for Charter Review Commission?

Sat, May 17, 2014, 1:34 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley takes a closer look at the Charter Review Commission candidates

2 comments; last on May 21, 2014

Riley scoops Herald - again

Fri, May 09, 2014, 9:02 am  //  John Servais

The Political Junkie for Whatcom County - that would be Riley Sweeney - has Overstreet not running for reelection in the 42nd.

1 comments; last on May 13, 2014

The Whatcom Republicans’ Huge PCO Advantage

Tue, May 06, 2014, 4:52 pm  //  Riley Sweeney

The value of a Precinct Committee Officer . . .

1 comments; last on May 07, 2014

Move To Amend - Persons vs Corporations

Thu, May 01, 2014, 9:21 pm  //  Guest writer

Move to Amend is a national movement to amend the U.S. Constitution and define persons as people and speech as not money.

7 comments; last on Jun 02, 2014

SweenyPolitics:  Fleetwood files against Ericksen

Wed, Apr 30, 2014, 7:20 am  //  John Servais

Riley posted this morning that Seth Fleetwood has decided to challenge Doug Ericksen for state senate in the 42nd District.

1 comments; last on Apr 30, 2014

Charter Review and District Only Voting

Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 9:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

A simple explanation of the Charter Review and analysis of District only voting


Rep. Vincent Buys Appears to Break State Fundraising Laws

Tue, Mar 11, 2014, 10:24 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley catches State Rep. Vincent Buys for soliciting funds during session


Gary Jensen Not Running for State Senate

Mon, Dec 16, 2013, 12:30 pm  //  John Servais

Ferndale Mayor Gary Jensen has decided not to file for the 42nd state Senate seat currently held by Doug Ericksen.

5 comments; last on Dec 24, 2013

Election Analysis: What Happened with the Port Races?

Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 10:21 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley crunches the numbers on Renata and McAuley's races to find answers

2 comments; last on Nov 13, 2013

Election Results - November 2013

Tue, Nov 05, 2013, 8:21 pm  //  John Servais

With lots of outside county money flowing in to our local races, this election is weird. But real - and we county residents have spoken.

11 comments; last on Nov 09, 2013

Ken Bell and Renata for Port

Sun, Oct 20, 2013, 7:07 pm  //  John Servais

Ken Bell has my vote over Mike McAuley for port commissioner. And Renata Kowalczyk has it over Dan Robbins.

8 comments; last on Oct 30, 2013

How the Coal Industry Funneled $40,000 into Whatcom

Wed, Oct 02, 2013, 5:40 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley uncovers how the Coal Industry is funding conservative candidates in Whatcom County

11 comments; last on Oct 03, 2013

Over $330,000 raised and spent on elections in Whatcom County

Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 6:08 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley examines who is donating to which candidates


Can We Talk? Doug Ericksen for Congress!

Mon, Aug 19, 2013, 7:08 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley whole-heartedly urges Doug Ericksen to run for Congress in 2014

2 comments; last on Aug 19, 2013

Greenways Levy Money Used for AstroTurf

Sun, Jun 30, 2013, 10:28 am  //  John Servais

Bellingham City Council ready to approve $500,000 of trails money for resurfacing plastic grass on Civic Field.

15 comments; last on Jul 02, 2013

Who is filing for elective offices???

Fri, May 17, 2013, 4:44 pm  //  John Servais

Tuesday morning and nothing in today's Bellingham Herald. Nor online. We provide the basics to fill in this latest omission by our "daily" newspaper.

9 comments; last on May 23, 2013

Freedom Academy Comes to Whatcom County

Mon, Apr 22, 2013, 5:52 am  //  Riley Sweeney

Riley attends Tea Party training and runs afoul of Rep. Overstreet

1 comments; last on Apr 22, 2013

City Controls Chuckanut Park - Not New Park District

Fri, Feb 22, 2013, 2:47 pm  //  John Servais

The election created a new park district with taxing power - but with NO control over Chuckanut Ridge - the 100 acre woods.

1 comments; last on Feb 23, 2013

Thoughts on the Park District Vote

Wed, Feb 13, 2013, 3:42 pm  //  John Servais

The Park District vote is close and we will not know final results until late ballots are counted.

6 comments; last on Feb 19, 2013

Time to Vote on Park District

Sat, Feb 09, 2013, 12:14 am  //  John Servais

The proponents have avoided the issues on the Park District as the close of voting nears this weekend.

2 comments; last on Feb 12, 2013

Check the Protect Bellingham Parks Website

Wed, Feb 06, 2013, 10:42 pm  //  John Servais

When is a vote No the most positive and common sense action? Check the park district opponents website to learn why.

15 comments; last on Feb 10, 2013

Ironies With the Park District

Tue, Feb 05, 2013, 12:59 pm  //  John Servais

This Park District proposal has several ironic twists and facets - some involving the advocates.

10 comments; last on Feb 07, 2013

The Big Picture on Chuckanut Ridge

Sun, Feb 03, 2013, 3:05 pm  //  Guest writer

Nicholas Zaferatos explains why he is concerned about the park district and looks at the long and short term views if the issue.

11 comments; last on Feb 06, 2013

A note from the publisher

Sat, Feb 02, 2013, 11:18 am  //  John Servais

The Chuckanut Park District ballot issue has another 10 days to run. A few notes about NWCitizen and this issue.

11 comments; last on Feb 05, 2013

Chuckanut Mountains and the Park District

Fri, Feb 01, 2013, 3:16 pm  //  Guest writer

Dr. Gibb explains some history to the issue in a brief article.

8 comments; last on Feb 03, 2013

Former Park Directors Against Park District Proposal

Thu, Jan 31, 2013, 12:36 pm  //  Guest writer

Paul Leuthold and Byron Elmendorf explain why to vote NO on the Chuckanut Park District ballot measure.

19 comments; last on Feb 12, 2013

It Is Not a Vote to Save The Forest

Thu, Jan 31, 2013, 12:26 am  //  Guest writer

Guest post by long time south side resident Marci (Hanson) Haskell on why to vote no on the Park District

5 comments; last on Feb 01, 2013

Why I am voting NO on the Park Disttict

Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 9:40 am  //  John Servais

The Park District is a panic action that over taxes a small group. A city wide solution is by far the better way to proceed.

13 comments; last on Feb 01, 2013

Feb 12 election:  Bham Southside Only

Thu, Jan 24, 2013, 4:09 pm  //  John Servais

Updated Sat, Jan 26. A primer on the special Parks District election - and where to find more info.

15 comments; last on Jan 31, 2013

Prop 1: New Parks District is Wrong Approach

Thu, Jan 24, 2013, 9:49 am  //  Guest writer

By Bill Geyer. South Bellingham citizens vote over the next couple weeks on a self tax to form a park district and pay the Chuckanut Ridge debt.

30 comments; last on Jan 31, 2013


Election Info

Auditor Election page

State Results - Nov 3
Whatcom Results - Nov 3

Coal, Oil & Trains

Coal Stop

Community Wise Bham
Powder River Basin R. C.

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Business Journal
Bham Politics & Econ
Cascadia Weekly
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
Noisy Waters
Northern Light
Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut C. Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice


- Whatcom County

Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
State Results - Nov 3
US House
US Senate
US Supreme Court
US The White House
WA State
Whatcom COG

NWCitizen 1995-2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That?


Adventures NW

Bellingham Wins
Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Recreation Northwest
Sailing Anarchy

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Change The Mascot
Common Dreams
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Drudge Report
Foreign Policy in Focus
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Huffington Post
Innocence Project
Irish Times
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Sea Shepherd
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
War and Piece
Washington Votes

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register

Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Jack Petree
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Protect Bellingham Parks
Sweeney Politics
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders