Proposed over-water walkway is dead

Permalink +

Sat, May 21, 2016, 4:32 pm  //  John Servais

View from north end of Boulevard Park and looking north to the Cornwall landfill. The white on the landfill is a huge plastic blanket covering the toxic dump. The walkway would extend from this dock to there.

It can now be reliably reported that the long planned over-water walkway, running from the north end of Boulevard Park to the Cornwall Avenue landfill, has been cancelled by the Bellingham Parks Department. Almost since the completion of the Taylor Dock, the city has planned this second concrete walkway which would be nearly double the length of the Taylor Dock. Cancelling this project will free up $4 million in Greenways funds for actual green ways as opposed to a concrete bridge. 

There has not been much public support for the project but the city has been quietly pushing it since 2010. The city applied for, and received, federal grants of over $2 million. They planned to add $4 million of Greenways funds for a total of $6 million of the estimated $8 million needed for the project, with the rest from city impact fees and excise taxes. But the federal funds were granted based on questionable claims. The grants were available for transportation projects and this dock didn't seem to serve that purpose at all.  Further, the city's application indicated the concrete walkway "...will significantly improve public shoreline access along Bellingham’s waterfront by providing a continuous shoreline trail between Fairhaven and the former Cornwall Avenue Landfill site,..."  It fails to mention we already have a wonderful South Bay Trail along the shoreline from Boulevard Park connecting to the north and downtown Bellingham. 

In 2010, the city reached out to the Lummi Nation for approval of the project, per their authority by the 1855 Point Elliot Treaty, as the waters along Bellingham Bay where the walkway would have been built is in salmon fishing grounds. In season, gillnet fishing boats can be seen along the Bellingham waterfront. The Taylor Dock was grandfathered as it was originally a railroad track built on pilings 100 years ago.

Documents between the city and Lummi Nation show that from the beginning the Lummi were reluctant to even study the new proposed walkway project. According to a reliable source inside city hall, the city offered the Lummi $50,000 for their permission. This offer apparently offended Lummi leaders and sealed their refusal to study the project.  

See PDF file with this letter plus Lummi Nation documents relating to walkway. ( temp note:  prior to 7:45 pm this evening, the wrong document was linked.  The correct one is now in place.)

A week ago, the city wrote the Washington Department of Transportation to request that state grants for the walkway be transferred to road projects near the Granary on the old Georgia Pacific site. In part, the request said, "The [walkway] Project is unbuildable, at this time, and we hereby request a waiver to payback of the funds." This pretty well says the project is dead, but also opens questions regarding the hundreds of thousands of dollars the city has already spent planning this now-defunct bridge. 

Over the past six years, the city has spent over $800 thousand of state administered federal grant money planning this walkway, leaving only about $1.6 million for use near the Granary.  Of the original $8 million, the $4 million in Greenways money remains available to us.  The city addresses the issue of state funds already spent on this project in the attached pdf file, linked from earlier paragraph.

I have been watching for documents indicating this project was dead ever since a senior level source in city hall told me weeks ago that the bridge was dead in the water. Two weeks ago, I attended a Greenways Advisory Committee meeting where they spent some time discussing possible projects for the newly available $4 million dollars. But still no official word.

Based on the Greenways committee discussion, I contacted the city to learn what might become of the newly-released walkway funds. The administrator I spoke with was emphatic that the $4 million was earmarked for waterfront transportation needs and would not be available for land acquisition or trail development anywhere away from the downtown redevelopment area. This conflicts with my understanding that the Greenways Advisory Committee is authorized to recommend uses of the Greenways fund to the City Council, and it is the council that decides how the funds are used. The administration's reaction to my question suggests the mayor and parks department are trying to gain control of that $4 million -  perhaps to solve budget shortfalls and aid other non-green projects?

The return of an unencumbered $4 million into our Greenways Fund opens a variety of opportunities. I will follow up later this weekend with a suggestion; perhaps other citizens also have suggestions.  A few years ago, the city spent half a million dollars of Greenways funds to install plastic grass at civic field - outraging many citizens who voted for the last Greenways levy.  Hopefully, these returned funds from the cancelled walkway will be used for land acquisition and more trails as we were promised when we voted for the levy in 2006.

As a reminder: Another Greenways levy (#4) will be on the ballot in November. Last Monday, the City Council unanimously agreed to send it to the public for a vote.  Greenways 4 will run for seven years. The rate will be reduced from the current Greenways 3 levy of 59 cents per thousand dollars of property value to 50 cents. However, as written now, it allocates only 33% of funds for land acquisition - the lowest percentage ever. The mayor complained to the council that even 33% is too much. Further, 25% would supplement the regular parks department maintenance on all parks - not just Greenways-acquired land.  Mayor Linville doesn't seem to understand why we have agreed to tax ourselves for the Greenways levies for the past 26 years.  

A special thanks to Wendy Harris for managing to get the attached documents showing how the Lummi Nation has again saved us from ourselves in our efforts to wreck our waterfronts - whether from detrimental coal terminals or unsightly, unnecessary and un-green concrete walking bridges.

The plan for the now cancelled dock. It would be half a mile long and be set with almost 100 pilings in what are salmon fishing grounds. Notice South Bay Trail is not shown on the land along the shoreline.

David Camp  //  Sun, May 22, 2016, 3:19 am

The railway line is the issue - the walkway allowed bike and foot traffic from the South side to downtown without crossing the tracks at the level crossing at the north end of Boulevard Park. And if I remember correctly, BNSF could still close off that crossing. You saw what happened in Ferndale where BNSF applied for, and was granted, the right to close the level crossing at Brown Rd. All it would tale is some vindictiveness at BNSF over the dang nimby hippies in b’ham for killing the coal dump. Does it seem to you that the train drivers are riding their horns louder and longer through town at night than required?


Tim Paxton  //  Sun, May 22, 2016, 9:17 am

Great News!  Good report and big thanks also to Wendy Harris for being on top of this subject for years.  This trail idea was an insult to Greenways supporters and Lummis alike.  The City was forced to abandon this plan.

There already IS a trail along the shore line and opening this overwater one would have made it easier for the City to Vacate the Boulevard trail in favor of condo developers.  It was not a land acquisition.

This all White person designed trail was racist in its gross presumption that the Lummi Nation would simply give up its historic fishing and shell fishing grounds forever.  The final insult was the destination mound of toxic waste.  Who would even take a dog to visit a pile of mercury or dioxin?

I understand the new proposed Greenways fund is already targeted to pay for clean up cost of these mountains of toxic waste made by GP.  I certainly won’t vote for that type of new and abused Greenways fund.


John Servais  //  Sun, May 22, 2016, 11:07 am

David,

Actually, BNSF cannot close the crossings in Bellingham because those crossings - rights of way - existed before the railroads came to Bellingham.  In most towns in the American west, the railroad was first and the towns grew up around the railroad - leaving the railroads able to dictate crossing terms.  Not so in Bellingham.

About 12 years ago, the railroad tried to close the crossing and was quickly made aware that they could not.  That pedestrian crossing is now there forever.  It is not a detriment to using the South Bay Trail.

This crossing is also now much safer than in the past.  When the RR tried to close this it was because they said it was unsafe for pedestrians crossing.  The mayor promised to make the crossing safe - and then did not.  And just a few years later Maya was tragically killed riding her bike and being hit by an Amtrak train.  Since then the city and BNSF have greatly improved the safety of the crossing and think they are done.  But it is still unsafe.  It can easily be made quite safe - and it is a job for us citizens to pressure our elected city government to make it so.

That said, making this crossing totally safe is 1/100th the cost of the over the water walkway.  And does not violate fishing rights.


Scott Wicklund  //  Sun, May 22, 2016, 12:05 pm

The pdf documents John posted are imho a must read to grasp the arrogance of those involved at COB.  Has Wharf Street already been vacated to BNSF?  That was my impression.  Thanks for this post!


Tip Johnson  //  Sun, May 22, 2016, 5:37 pm

I recall the RR used the trail closure to negotiate an increased speed limit through town.  Then mayor Asmundson readily granted it in their franchise renewal.  Remarkably, The Bellingham franchise didn’t cover the route through the former City of Fairhaven, never having been corrected upon that city’s consolidation with Bellingham.  In other words, we probably had the leverage to negotiate a much better long term relationship with the RR, but caved and gave them the speed increase which necessitates longer horn blasts.


George Dyson  //  Mon, May 23, 2016, 1:21 pm

I suppose it is commendable to hear COB declare this project to be “unbuildable, at this time.” The B-side to this sad, expensive tale is that the State surface transportation funding is being shifted to the Granary Avenue project, in support of a bankrupt plan for waterfront redevelopment which is also unbuildable, at this time. The pie-in-the-sky waterfront redevelopment plan which was the basis for giving G-P / Koch Industries a free pass out of town was also the basis of a disastrously one-sided Interlocal Agreement, which, instead of keeping COB afloat, appears to be sucking the life out of everything in town.


Alex McLean  //  Mon, May 23, 2016, 4:03 pm

A few points:

Greenway funds—at least for the current levy that is about to expire—have two devoted tranches, or dividers. These are defined by “Acquisition” dollars and “Development” dollars.

The “$4 million” that was pegged to the Overwater Walkway, since it very clearly is a construction project, always has been and likely always will be allocated to Development projects—it is money for building and forming completed parks and trails, making the purchased lands useable for the public by installing parking lots, benches, toilets, etc.—and likely will not be made available to make new Acquisitions.
 
While it is true that City Council could muscle these dollars around into different areas (as they have ultimate authority to sausage these dollars any way they want) I doubt that will happen. At least not easily.

I will continue to maintain that the existence of the South Bay Trail, while clearly a “duplicate” of the route defined by the Overwater Walkway, is not now and likely never will be an adequate route of access to our future waterfront and the new, someday, Cornwall Beach Park.

If we concede that railway crossings are an issue (they totally are) then please add the complication of Warf Street—that queer dogleg of asphalt that shunts cars up the hill and onto Boulevard and its vehicle route to Fairhaven.

Warf Street, due partly to the street-level railroad crossing, will either be closed or need a ramp in later phases of Waterfront District development.
While we could wait for that day and, presumably, install sidewalks and trail access to the already absurdly expensive endeavor ... that day will likely come decades after Cornwall Beach Park is completed, long after it is ready for use and public enjoyment.

As it stands, Warf Street has no sidewalks, no bike lane, no guardrails to skip over in a panic when some imbecile flies up the dark and twisty route and nudges families and bikes into the ferns. It has, at best, a steep hill on one side and a painted line—with a foot of wiggle room next to the muddy walls—on the other.

We’ll need public non-motorized access to this park and to the Waterfront District someday: that, in my mind, is an absolute fact. The existing Taylor Street dock, our current overwater walkway, gets over 900,000 users per year—by far the most popular “trail” in the County and, whatever your opinion of its aesthetics and environmental impact, a massive asset to both non-motorized transportation and to the tourism, health, recreation, and overall enjoyment of our (awesome) park system.

My proposition, and I think a cursory look at past pages here would confirm this, is that a devoted ramp shooting off the bluff, over the tracks, and into the southernmost end of our future Cornwall Beach Park is an ideal alternative to the (admittedly) long and expensive design proposed for the canceled Overwater Walkway. It could still be a really cool, flashy, addition to our most popular trail and parks—an asset on many levels—but it would cancel the awkwardness, inefficiency, and possible danger of needing to use Warf Street and having to loop into Cornwall Beach Park rather than through it.

It seems a minor point, I know.
But connectivity should be a priority for linking these two massively popular public assets, these biggest of our waterfront parks. I don’t think Warf Street—with its various existing and future design headaches—will ever fit the bill.

We deserve something better, something worthy of nearly a million users per-year, and something carefully designed and thought out.

We should, therefore, endeavor to plant the seed within the City of Bellingham mindhive that a devoted bridge from the S. Bay Trail into Cornwall Beach Park be seriously explored as a goal. Some of these dangling development funds, from Greenways III, could be pinned to that effort.


Tim Paxton  //  Mon, May 23, 2016, 7:28 pm

I am pretty sure that the Lummi Nation already said no, and they meant it.  The over water walkway idea is contingent on the Lummis giving up their traditional fishing and shell fishing rights.  Not likely.  Some people apparently seem to have a hard time wrapping their brains around this concept of Native American treaty or historical rights. 


Geoff Middaugh  //  Tue, May 24, 2016, 6:29 am

First, what Alex said. 

Second, this project had full public support once, and was fully permitted in regards to land use, SEPA, etc. by the State and the City of Bellingham, except for the final building permits.  The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, and earlier members of Greenways where in support of the project.  Citizen’s voted to support it in Greenways votes. 

It died a slow death because of local politics, and bureaucratic ineptness.  In early negotiations, the Lummi demanded what the COB wouldn’t give, and whether there was $50,000 involved, I don’t know.  That sounds like post hoc rationalization, and is different from what I heard after 10 years involved with the project and six years on the PRAB supporting it.   

WSDOT originally told the COB they had to get a COE permit, but then later in the process, changed their minds and said they need a Coast Guard bridge permit.  The coast guard was working towards approval, but the Lummi pushed back, within the tribal rights issues of Cherry Point playing in the background.  There were numerous types of mitigation offered, but the COB would not agree with what the Lummi demanded.  I don’t blame the Lummi, because they have a vested right.  I don’t blame the COB, because what was demanded was beyond tribal fishing rights.  But, I do blame WSDOT for their malfeasance, and disingenuous negotiations with the City.  They let the political support for this project erode.  Transportation projects always get approved, or they ignore the tribes position, but recreation projects do not.  Double standards.

In public interest theory, those who support something have broad and shallow difused interests, while those opposed have narrow and deep focus.  We know who prevailed on this one.

For minimally distorted facts on the topic, read the 17 page detailed 2010 Hearing Examiner decision, and the litany of letters by the COE, Coast Guard and numerous contractors.  It’s posted on the COB website. 

But now its time to move on.  I think that the citizens of Bellingham need to get behind the new Greenways Initiative, and make it work for all of Bellingham.  It’s an amazing opportunity, and something too great to lose by fighting over projects and selective rewriting of history. 


John Watts  //  Tue, May 24, 2016, 6:49 pm

It’s been a while since I’ve commented here. My wife’s passing has distracted me. Note June 4 at 2PM her memorial at Bellingham Unitarian Fellowship. All come!
————————-
But, this issue really does qualify as an ‘issue’. Some of the earlier comments seem to have become ‘issues’ in their own right; issues of ‘truthiness’, credibility and in-grained, permanently unbalanced, political mind-sets.

I am inclined to agree much more with Mssrs Middaugh and McLean, who seem to actually know what they are talking about, not speculating on pet peeves or prejudices.

This IS an issue that matters, as is the future of the Greenways levy itself. Whether GW-4 becomes a voting matter also matters, as does the Mayor’s alternate idea of a Metropolitan Parks District to create a permanent funding mechanism to insure Bellingham Parks, Trails & Open Space can be maintained, even under inevitable General Fund inadequacies.

Both are important, but taking care of what Bellingham already has, takes precedence.

City Council DOES have the last word on discretionary funds, like Greenways, but ought to listen attentively to PRAB and Greenways Advisory Board to allocate GW $ fairly. They seriously abrogated this responsibility in the purchase of ‘Chuckanut Ridge’. Fortunately, this mis-step has now been mitigated!

The Metro Parks District idea would likely diminish similar susceptibility to political agendas and act more like a dedicated Enterprise Fund Utility. Both funding mechanisms are valuable, and both are probably needed.

My 2 cents…


Tim Paxton  //  Thu, May 26, 2016, 8:10 am

$4 million dollars now freed up for Greenways Land Acquisition!  That is great news.  Start with saving the last Heron Colony.  That topic has already been approved by Greenways advisory committee earlier this month.

Since 2003, people thought the Post Point Heron Colony was saved but the money was never released.  There is a deadline to take action, alas, apparently Mayor Kelli and Parks is blocking protection.  They claim the Greenways money for their secret non land acquisition schemes.

Time to call / write City Council to insist they use the Greenways money for what the voters want, which is land acquisition.  Protect the Herons.

 


Proposed over-water walkway is dead

The planned concrete walkway from Boulevard Park to the Cornwall landfill, using millions in Greenway funds, has been abandoned by Bellingham. We again thank the Lummi.

John Servais
Sat, May 21, 2016, 4:32 pm
11 comments; last on May 26, 2016

Missing Options High School traffic study

Bellingham School officials expect a slam dunk by Hearing Examiner and city council on street vacation and conditional use permit. By Patrick McKee.

Guest writer
Tue, May 17, 2016, 7:45 pm
2 comments; last on May 18, 2016


Don’t speak at tonight’s Districting Committee hearing

If you do, you better make sure you have something to say that's going to change someone's mind.

Ralph Schwartz
Wed, Apr 13, 2016, 9:09 am
3 comments; last on Apr 14, 2016

Bellingham Planning tries to sneak one through

The Sunnyland residents have just learned they have only today to comment on a huge impacting building project in their neighborhood.

John Servais
Mon, Apr 11, 2016, 1:06 am
11 comments; last on Apr 23, 2016

Voting guide for Whatcom Conservation District

Updated Wed, Mar 16. Tuesday, March 15, from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., any registered voter of Whatcom County can vote in person at the conservation district office.

John Servais
Wed, Mar 16, 2016, 8:26 pm
0 comments

The state of citizen journalism is strong: Two receive deArmond awards

The third annual deArmond dinner celebrated the work of Sandy Robson and Neah Monteiro.

Ralph Schwartz
Fri, Mar 11, 2016, 11:28 pm
2 comments; last on Mar 13, 2016

Whatcom Conservation District Elections

Barbara Perry has been researching the secretive election processes of the Whatcom Conservation District. Really secretive. Probably fraudulent.

Guest writer
Sun, Aug 09, 2015, 11:52 am
1 comments; last on Aug 12, 2015

Whatcom County Council adds ballot measure

Last minute political maneuvering by liberal council seeks to counter conservative review commission ballot proposals.

John Servais
Wed, Jul 08, 2015, 9:27 am
1 comments; last on Aug 12, 2015

Charter Commission Tricks

Two dirty tricks by the uber-conservative minority on the Charter Review Commission aimed to put their agenda before the council.

John Servais
Mon, Jul 06, 2015, 4:30 pm
3 comments; last on Jul 07, 2015

A Perspective on Port Politics

The port's latest bone-headed deal calls for the good citizens of Whatcom County to consider the options...unless we're enjoying our Groundhog Day.

John Servais
Sat, Apr 04, 2015, 1:15 pm
3 comments; last on Apr 07, 2015

Port Gives Away Our Bellingham Waterfront

Port of Bellingham today sold out our public waterfront to a foreign shell company formed 6 days ago. Sold it cheap and with a screwy arrangement.

John Servais
Wed, Apr 01, 2015, 12:20 am
32 comments; last on Apr 05, 2015

The Hidden Election

No ballot mailed to you. You must request a ballot for voting in the Whatcom Conservation District election. Deadline to apply is Feb 9. By Barbara Perry

Guest writer
Mon, Feb 02, 2015, 9:34 am
0 comments

Bham Planning Director - Rick Sepler Chosen

Three final candidates for Bellingham Planning Director spoke today at a cozy 'meet and greet' of government employees and developers.

John Servais
Wed, Oct 08, 2014, 6:24 pm
6 comments; last on Oct 11, 2014

You can’t fight city hall: city hall doesn’t fight fair

Patrick McKee of the Sunnyland Neighborhood guest-writes about the August 11 City Council slap-dash zoning changes.

Guest writer
Fri, Aug 22, 2014, 2:06 pm
2 comments; last on Aug 23, 2014

Devil In the Details

Judith Green of the Sunnyland Neighborhood guest writes this brief summary of what went wrong with the planning last week.

Guest writer
Sat, Aug 16, 2014, 3:48 pm
1 comments; last on Aug 22, 2014

The Rule of Law - Bellingham Style

Bellingham City Council abruptly changes zoning codes to force Planning Department plan on Sunnyland residents.

John Servais
Mon, Aug 11, 2014, 11:31 pm
7 comments; last on Aug 14, 2014

Dawn Sturwold Retiring End of Month

Bellingham Hearing Examiner, Dawn Sturwold, retires in three weeks. Successor selection is hidden from all of us.

John Servais
Tue, Jun 10, 2014, 11:20 am
3 comments; last on Jun 12, 2014

The Whatcom Republicans’ Huge PCO Advantage

The value of a Precinct Committee Officer . . .

Riley Sweeney
Tue, May 06, 2014, 5:52 pm
1 comments; last on May 07, 2014

Charter Review and District Only Voting

A simple explanation of the Charter Review and analysis of District only voting

Riley Sweeney
Thu, Apr 17, 2014, 10:40 am
0 comments

County Considers Purchasing Toxic Property

Riley digs into the county's plan to buy the county morgue

Riley Sweeney
Wed, Mar 19, 2014, 10:32 am
3 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Rep. Vincent Buys Appears to Break State Fundraising Laws

Riley catches State Rep. Vincent Buys for soliciting funds during session

Riley Sweeney
Tue, Mar 11, 2014, 11:24 am
0 comments

County Hires GPT Permit Lead as Senior Planner

Riley digs into an unusual hiring decision at the County Planning Dept

Riley Sweeney
Mon, Mar 10, 2014, 10:51 am
1 comments; last on Mar 10, 2014

Have You Exceeded Your Right To Information?

Filing a public record request could land a citizen in jail under a proposal reflected in a Herald opinion article.

Wendy Harris
Sat, Feb 01, 2014, 1:35 am
2 comments; last on Feb 03, 2014

Cascadia Weekly Blasts Waterfront Plan

Bellingham City Council and Port of Bellingham finalize the waterfront plan. In his weekly Gristle, Tim Johnson blasts the corrupt public process.

John Servais
Wed, Dec 04, 2013, 11:53 am
4 comments; last on Dec 05, 2013

Treaty Rights and Public Rights Ignored In Overwater Walkway

The city staff considers the overwater walkway a done deal before official approval or resolution of treaty right conflicts

Wendy Harris
Tue, Oct 08, 2013, 3:22 pm
4 comments; last on Oct 16, 2013

How the Coal Industry Funneled $40,000 into Whatcom

Riley uncovers how the Coal Industry is funding conservative candidates in Whatcom County

Riley Sweeney
Wed, Oct 02, 2013, 6:40 am
11 comments; last on Oct 03, 2013

Government is Good

As the right wing radicals seek to shut down our national government this week, we need to push back with common sense.

John Servais
Sat, Sep 28, 2013, 3:20 pm
8 comments; last on Oct 01, 2013

Over $330,000 raised and spent on elections in Whatcom County

Riley examines who is donating to which candidates

Riley Sweeney
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 7:08 am
0 comments

Privacy Story of Feds Stripping All

The Feds gag an Email service owner - so he cannot even tell us why he is gagged.

John Servais
Wed, Aug 14, 2013, 12:24 pm
2 comments; last on Aug 16, 2013

Water Agreement Fails Scrutiny

The City of Bellingham memorandum of agreement with Lynden does not make sense. What is going on?

Wendy Harris
Wed, Aug 14, 2013, 12:31 am
4 comments; last on Sep 11, 2013

Zero Public Process for New Jail

Riley Sweeney has a short but important expose over at the Political Junkie today.

John Servais
Fri, Jul 12, 2013, 9:29 am
1 comments; last on Jul 12, 2013

Greenways Levy Money Used for AstroTurf

Bellingham City Council ready to approve $500,000 of trails money for resurfacing plastic grass on Civic Field.

John Servais
Sun, Jun 30, 2013, 11:28 am
15 comments; last on Jul 02, 2013

Sen. Doug Ericksen Co-opts rather than Cooperate

Riley Sweeney examines Sen. Ericksen's legislative methods

Riley Sweeney
Fri, Jun 28, 2013, 7:29 am
0 comments

NWCitizen Stands With Edward Snowden

Edward Snowden is a very courageous patriot, in the opinion of the publisher of NWCitizen.

John Servais
Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 1:53 pm
3 comments; last on Jun 15, 2013

Caught In The Whatcom Court System

Luba Pekisheva has been given a confusing run around in our Whatcom County courts for over three years. Judges, prosecutors and clerks have all participated.

John Servais
Fri, May 31, 2013, 5:43 pm
1 comments; last on May 10, 2015

Freedom Academy Comes to Whatcom County

Riley attends Tea Party training and runs afoul of Rep. Overstreet

Riley Sweeney
Mon, Apr 22, 2013, 6:52 am
1 comments; last on Apr 23, 2013

Senator Ericksen Displays His Colors

Riley Sweeney has posted a great video clip of Sen. Doug Ericksen flouting rules and legal procedures at a Senate hearing in Olympia.

John Servais
Fri, Feb 22, 2013, 4:01 pm
0 comments

City Controls Chuckanut Park - Not New Park District

The election created a new park district with taxing power - but with NO control over Chuckanut Ridge - the 100 acre woods.

John Servais
Fri, Feb 22, 2013, 3:47 pm
1 comments; last on Feb 24, 2013

Waterfront EIS Revised Without Public Process

An "Updated Preferred Alternative" reduces the number of waterfront jobs and expands the boundary of the waterfront district.

Wendy Harris
Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 10:40 pm
0 comments

The County Planning Commission is Broke

The planning commission no longer serves its purpose due to Council's poor appointment choices

Wendy Harris
Wed, Jan 30, 2013, 1:09 am
2 comments; last on Feb 11, 2013

Doug Ericksen’s Opening Moves

Riley looks into Ericksen's legislative efforts this session

Riley Sweeney
Tue, Jan 15, 2013, 5:53 pm
1 comments; last on Jan 22, 2013

The Public Locked out of Jail Selection Process

Riley examines why the new jail site was selected without public input

Riley Sweeney
Sat, Nov 10, 2012, 10:53 am
1 comments; last on Nov 12, 2012

Stealth Politics Returns

The Whatcom county Voters’ Pamphlet containing misleading and untrue statements by unregistered, unaccountable and anonymous front groups.

Paul deArmond
Sun, Nov 04, 2012, 10:21 am
3 comments; last on Nov 06, 2012

Rep. Jason Overstreet’s Record

Riley pores through Rep. Jason Overstreet's legislative record

Riley Sweeney
Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 9:35 am
7 comments; last on Dec 02, 2012

Rep. Vincent Buys’ Record

Riley examines Rep. Vincent Buys' legislative record

Riley Sweeney
Tue, Oct 02, 2012, 9:22 am
1 comments; last on Dec 02, 2012

The REAL Problem With Costco

The Mayor's Negotiations With Costco Undercuts City Permit Procedures And Public Process

Wendy Harris
Fri, Aug 17, 2012, 12:50 am
4 comments; last on Aug 17, 2012

Coal Free Bellingham: Point Proven?

Questions raised by the Superior Court's barring of the Bellingham Community Bill of Rights initiative from being placed on the ballot.

Larry Horowitz
Thu, Aug 09, 2012, 9:30 pm
21 comments; last on Aug 17, 2012

We have met the enemy and [s]he is…

... the person who recently had this to say about the Sunnyland Neighborhood rezone application

Larry Horowitz
Thu, Jul 26, 2012, 8:18 am
9 comments; last on Aug 01, 2012

Last chance, file for PCO

A short plea for public involvement from Riley

Riley Sweeney
Fri, May 18, 2012, 11:27 am
0 comments

Video of port commissioners is posted

A 26 minute video of the port commissioners explaining their positions on the firing of executive director Charlie Sheldon is posted.

John Servais
Wed, Apr 18, 2012, 12:28 pm
7 comments; last on Apr 19, 2012

Congressional Candidates and Overstreet’s Town Hall

Riley at The Political Junkie attends a forum of Congressional Candidates, and a town hall meeting in Lynden

Riley Sweeney
Sun, Feb 19, 2012, 6:37 pm
0 comments

UPDATE: City of Bham Moonlighting Issue - More Documents

Riley updates us on the latest facts coming to light about City of Bellingham employee moonlighting

Riley Sweeney
Tue, Jan 31, 2012, 12:58 am
2 comments; last on Feb 02, 2012

Sam Crawford Faces Ethical Concerns . . . AGAIN

Local blogger Shane Roth files ethical complaint over Crawford's sweetheart deals

Riley Sweeney
Thu, Dec 15, 2011, 2:44 pm
3 comments; last on Dec 16, 2011

UPDATE: City’s response focused on favoritism, not lost revenue

More on the city employee moonlighting issue

Riley Sweeney
Wed, Nov 30, 2011, 7:51 pm
0 comments

TPJ Exclusive: Little Documented Oversight for City Employee Moonlighting

The Political Junkie breaks a story of employee moonlighting within city of Bellingham

Riley Sweeney
Mon, Nov 28, 2011, 6:29 pm
7 comments; last on Dec 01, 2011

CameraGate:  Red-light safety or city revenue?

With budget woes, Bellingham passes on safety in favor of cash. Starting in 2008, Bellingham officials were coached by ATS on how to get Red Light cameras through…

Guest writer
Mon, Nov 21, 2011, 2:00 am
26 comments; last on Nov 30, 2011

Padden Trails Rezone – You Should Be Worried

The Padden Trails rezone effort is a misuse of the Infill Tool Kit on the outskirts of Bellingham.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Nov 15, 2011, 11:43 am
8 comments; last on Nov 16, 2011

From The Political Junkie: Crawford’s Secret Emails

Riley Sweeney does a public records request on Sam Crawford

Riley Sweeney
Tue, Apr 26, 2011, 4:39 pm
5 comments; last on May 06, 2011

From a Political Junkie: Doug Ericksen Threatens to Arrest the Press

At the mid-session townhall meeting, Doug Ericksen would rather threaten the press than have his words recorded

Riley Sweeney
Mon, Mar 14, 2011, 2:34 pm
17 comments; last on Mar 30, 2011

The New Jail: Pete? Let’s have a talk

Riley Sweeney talks about the Jail Meeting

Riley Sweeney
Fri, Feb 04, 2011, 5:29 pm
5 comments; last on Feb 09, 2011

 

About NWCitizen

Donations maintain site

Our writers
Thru the years

Election Links

Jeff Strung / WA Auditor

Mike LaPointe / US Congress

League of Women Voters

Calendar of Events

Home page
Videos of Districting Committee

Local Online News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Business Journal
Bham Politics & Econ
Cascadia Weekly
Coal Stop
Ferndale Record
KGMI
KPLU fm radio
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
Noisy Waters
Northern Light
Seattle Times
Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut C. Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Powder River Basin R. C.
RE Sources
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice

Our Governments

- Whatcom County

Bellingham
Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US House
US Senate
US Supreme Court
US The White House
WA State
Whatcom COG

NWCitizen 1995-2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
EPIC World Photos
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That?

Local Leisure

Adventures NW

Bellingham Wins
Entertainment NNW
Recreation Northwest

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Change The Mascot
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
Edge of Sports
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project
Irish Times
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
TED
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
Vox
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register

Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Jack Petree
MikeatthePort
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman
Protect Bellingham Parks
Sweeney Politics
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders