Important Election Issues Undecided

Permalink +

Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 12:05 am  //  John Servais

Joy Gilfilen talking with her supporters an hour after news of her election loss.

What to make of the returns?  Me thinks that some bets are on hold.  We have a low number of counted ballots as of this morning - about 40,500, or 31% of all registered voters.  This is probably only two thirds the total ballots that will be counted.  A low turnout of 45% to 50%, about 62,000 seems more likely, IMO, than the earlier thinking of 59% or 78,000 ballots.  Either way, elections can easily adjust 1 or 2 percentage points. And could adjust more.

In order of which could change between now and next Monday when all ballots should be counted:

Kathy Kirshner and Satpal Sidhu are tied for County Council.  Either can win.

Jail sales tax: This can go either way with 51% approval now.  We may not know this for sure until next Monday. 

Propositions 1 and 9 are both ahead with just 54%.  These could reverse, but it is unlikely.

Todd Donovan has almost 55% for County Council and will probably win.

Bobby Briscoe has 55% for port commissioner.  He will probably hold that for a win. 

But all of the above could reverse.  At least 17,000 more ballots will be counted, and it could be as high as 25,000 more. Ballots are slow coming in this year and the count is below earlier estimates by our auditor. 

The sure win is Jack Louws with 71% over Joy Gilfilen. Jack will serve a second term of four years as our county executive. 

Back to the charter propositions.  Several have less than 53% and so they might reverse.  But three propositions put on the ballot by the Charter Review Commission are easily passing, and they show a distrust of elected officials and a trust of citizens and direct participation in government.

Term limits of three terms will be law for the council and county executive with an overwhelming 70% support.  And a technically minor but important increase in the number of descriptive words allowed for initiatives was passed with 84% approval. People do want to understand a ballot measure.  And the number of signatures required for an initiative to amend the charter was lowered from 20% to 15% of voters.  This brings the percentage in line with other initiative rules. All good moves towards citizen direct participation in government.

With the possible passage of charter propositions 2, 3 and 10, our council and courts will come into play as these are contradictory amendments.  Not the place here to dive into them, but political junkies will have fun the next couple years. There is a modest chance one or more of these three will fail.

Basically, this was caused by the liberal County Council - under the direction of a small and semi secretive group of operatives - working to thwart the work of our Charter Review Commission.  Well, they did it.  Two poison pill amendments will probably pass - Propositions 9 and 10 - and the liberals will no doubt blame the Charter Review Commission.  One, conservatives, worked in the open under the rules and the other, liberals, worked secretly and illegally. 

A bit of disheartening trivia.  As of this election, the only City Council member we have who was actually elected - actually chosen by us voters - is Pinky Vargas.  All six other City Council members got into office by simply filing for office.  They all ran unopposed, either this year or two years ago.  Oh, we cast votes for them, but it did not matter as the candidates and their families could have elected them. 

With that in mind I want to thank Joy Gilfilen for filing and running against Jack Louws.  She brought to the public’s attention issues that we would not have heard without her.  She knew from the beginning that she had little chance of winning but she felt the jail issue was important, as were some other issues.  It is sad the Herald referred to her as a “gadfly,” and that reflects more on where the Herald has sunk to than on Gilfilen.  Supposedly it was because the jail tax was her main issue.  But then, Bruce Ayers was not called any names for making the jail his main issue.  A double standard and, naturally, it insults the woman. 

This evening, I attended a couple election gatherings, as I have every election night for many decades.  But this year I saw something I’ve never seen before.  A crowd of about 40 supporters of a losing candidate stayed an hour after the results confirmed their loss. And all were happy and congratulating Gilfilen.  And she gave a speech during which she pointed out most individuals by name and thanked them for specific talents and accomplishments.  There was camaraderie in that crowded banquet room.  To this old political junkie, it was a clear signal that Joy Gilfilen can be a serious candidate next time, and may have a very real chance of winning if she runs again.  Not a gadfly at all. She entered her first political contest and has emerged a more savvy citizen, ready to work with others toward needed changes.

Joy Gilfilen  //  Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 7:55 am

Thank you, John, for a smart summary.  And congratulations to so many people who worked so hard on campaigns that will change our community dramatically. It is true that more ballots must be counted before people will truly know the results - there are many close calls.

It was fun to do this meeting.  It was especially outstanding to feel the intellectual and capable power of an engaged group of smart citizens who are thrilled to have participated in this election, and they are ready for what is next. A good number of them have never been political, but they are savey in business and life.  This is a new leadership movement, and I feel that a new voice for independent action has been born.  They will be a rising tide of activists with their own opinions backed up by solid information.  To me, that is a huge win.

I am looking forward to the new counts. I do believe that the later returns will show the Jail Tax going down.

Personally, I am delighted with my showing. As a political novice, I had to fight in two rings against a gang of political power-mongers including the jail industry lobby. And I started behind the 8 ball with no team at all, and no money backers. 

While I am not apparently going to take office, I now know that there are at least 10,000 voters who voted for me.  And these are new thinkers who are now awake in Whatcom County listening to a whole new view of politics, and aware they have a pile of all new ideas and choices to advocate for that will help our community be stronger and safer. 

That means that politics as usual is old news.  There is a new game that will roll out over the next few months. I am looking forward to it.

Tip Johnson  //  Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 10:02 am

Both props 1 & 9 passing.  I guess that means folks want district only voting with five districts????

Walter Haugen  //  Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 10:34 am

Pretty good summary John. However, let me correct you on one point. The Whatcom County Council is not a “liberal” council. It has 6 moderates and a conservative. It is generally accepted that the Democratic Party has not been a liberal party since Bill Clinton, when he was willing to throw welfare mothers under the bus to compromise with Newt Gingrich and his Contract on America. (Whoops! Contract WITH America - or did I have it right the first time?) In fact, we could probably discount Jimmy Carter as a moderate too, evidence being the “Carter Doctrine” which formed the basis of our current wars for oil in the Mideast.

Those young folks who are now politically active have never seen a liberal administration, even one as two-faced as the Johnson Administration, or as war-mongering as the Kennedy Administration. Nor have politically active young folks ever seen a moderate Republican Administration, such as the Eisenhower Administration. So it is important in my mind to keep things straight. Ken Mann is no liberal - he just appears liberal in relation to the whacko Tea Party extremists. Carl Weimer is no environmentalist or a liberal - he voted for (and justified!) using glyphosphate on county roads, as did the other Council members. Rud Browne and Barry Buchanan are obviously moderates and not liberals. Barbara Brenner is a moderate, as is Satpal Sidhu. Pete Kremen is the lone conservative left on the Council.

Just because someone belongs to the “liberal wing” of the Democratic Party does NOT make them a liberal, simply because the Democratic Party has moved so far right, even Richard Nixon would be too liberal for them! (This is a common internet trope, by the way.)

The people who would actually qualify as “liberals” nowadays are the so-called “progressives.” People like Naomi Klein are an example. Check out the picture of Klein on this New Yorker story from 2008. She is wearing a Move the Center button, because that is what needs to be done - to move the center back to where liberals are liberals and not moderates. + Link

John Servais  //  Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 11:09 am

Walter, as an old guy myself - and I watched live the first televised political convention, the 1952 GOP - I agree that you do parse the historic liberal vs conservative correctly.  And to folks alive back in the 1970s, today’s organizations are all more to the right. 

That said, the terms liberal and conservative are relative descriptions for each generation.  In the future the trend could go in the liberal direction. In 30 years, an old conservative could complain that those who call conservative in 2045 are actually liberals by the old terms of 2015.  And the 1950s liberals were not nearly as liberal as those of the early 1970s.

That said, I doubt that most county council members would self describe themselves as liberal because the word, like socialism, has been made to be a pejorative description.  I’ll have to ask them. 

Relatively speaking, I generally agree with your descriptions of each of them.  But the giveaway of your descriptions being too personal to your viewpoint is your statement that “Carl Weimer is no environmentalist or a liberal,...”.  Tilt.  Carl is a fine environmentalist, in my opinion and that of most locals.  I suspect you are letting your disagreement with some of his votes get in the way of the greater description of Carl.

Dick Conoboy  //  Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 11:19 am


Did you feel a shift in the “force”? :-) I agree entirely with your statements regarding liberals. Neither of our councils are liberal by any stretch of the imagination let alone progressive.  As I have said before in comments here and on the Hawk and the Watch, a dinner for true progressives in this county would require a small table.

Walter Haugen  //  Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 11:26 am

John - I have been an environmentalist for over 45 years and the effects of glyphosphate on the environment, as well as the social fabric, are HUGE. My opposition to glyphosphate is because I do the science every day, as well as do plenty of research every day. Glyphosphate really IS a deciding issue. The other deciding issue for calling oneself an environmentalist is whether one acknowledges recession/depression/collapse as necessary to have a clean planet. This is well documented too, by the way.

So it is not a personal bias. It is just that I have integrated the science into my personal views. This is a big difference. Most scientists want to do their research and still have their cozy lifestyle. This is intellectually bankrupt.

Dena Jensen  //  Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 12:47 pm

I’ll start by quoting a section from the above article that I am addressing:
“With the possible passage of charter propositions 2, 3 and 10, our council and courts will come into play as these are contradictory amendments.  Not the place here to dive into them, but political junkies will have fun the next couple years. There is a modest chance one or more of these three will fail.
“Basically, this was caused by the liberal county council - under the direction of a small and semi secretive group of operatives - working to thwart the work of our charter review commission.  Well, they did it.  Two poison pill amendments will probably pass - props 9 and 10 - and the liberals will no doubt blame the charter review commission.  One, conservatives, worked in the open under the rules and the other, liberals, worked secretly and illegally. ”

I am here again, to just continue the refrain of alerting everyone here at NorthwestCitizen to the fact that the Charter Review Commission should not be allowed to be protected from their part in semi-secretive behaviors that made the public, and some commissioners, feel like completely secretive maneuvers were going on to push through a coal-fueled agenda.  So far, to my knowledge, no concrete proof of that complete secrecy has been made available to the public.

If it ever turns out to be proven that illegal actions were taken in the process of approving Prop 9 to be allowed onto the ballot for voters to decide, those illegal actions cannot be assigned to anyone but the people who committed them.  But the adoption of a strategy to offer the voters more choices on the 2015 ballot definitely should be considered as a valid response to conservative commissioners effectively shutting down voters’ options regarding their voting system in the election. And I certainly believe the Charter Commission process should be closely looked at, especially by virtue of the fact that their 6 months of operation and public participation in that process went on up to and including the approval by County Council of Proposition 9.

Why did certain commissioners deny sending or receiving any commission emails (when there was proof of at least a number of emails that had been sent to them by other Charter Commissioners and copies of email they had sent were found in the emails of other commissioners who had provided their emails).  And why would some commissioners NOT be using emails, that would be subject to public review, to interact with the public, when citizens like myself, were clearly writing them with their issues and concerns?

Why was consultant for the Gateway Pacific coal terminal Dave Brumbaugh consulting with commissioners “semi-secretively” about district only voting.

+ Link
+ Link

Ask Eli Mackewicz about about his assessment that there was an across-the-political-spectrum appeal from citizens to Charter Review commissioners to investigate the possibility of a different district set-up for Whatcom County.

Here is one public comment that I feel was echoed by many people who participated during the Charter Review Commission’s operation and who were concerned by the influence of coal money in pushing forward the agenda of conservative commissioners.

Here is a link to the meeting with this public testimony: + Link Review Commission May 18 2015.mp3?dl=0

Ronald Colson (at about 25:50 on the audio recording and part way through his public testimony, for May 18, 2015) : “And my concern is that if this ‘district only’ voting goes to the [a few words are indistinguishable here] and if your goal is to have a coal export facility built, well then, don’t beat around the bush. Talk about that. Let’s address the issues pro and con and make a decision based upon that. But if this is a back door thing to get a measure on for a vote that would isolate us into areas that certain groups that would have a preponderance of weight or control over much larger populations, I can see that the money would be poured into this election to literally confuse the voting public. And to make ‘em think that if they vote for the “district only” voting, why that’s the American Way or some such, when really what their goal is, is to build the coal export facility. So let’s not hide behind things. Let’s talk about the value of the district voting, and who it hurts, ‘cause I understand living in a little town and being steamrolled by a large population. That’s, that’s a problem and it needs to be addressed, but the ‘district only’ voting for the purpose of allowing outside corporate influences to bring in large dollars to achieve their corporate goals: that’s oligarchy. That’s not democracy. Thank you.”

+ Link Review Commission May 18 2015.mp3?dl=0
P.S.  When I click the link above from this comment, I get a 404, so here is a link to the full page of agendas, minutes and audio and this comment came from the 5/18/2015 Special Charter Review Commission Meeting - 6:30 p.m. at The Firs Conference Center, 4605 Cable Street, Bellingham
+ Link

Important Election Issues Undecided

The first returns - probably 60% of the final vote - shows contradictory propositions passing and most candidate races decided.

John Servais
Wed, Nov 04, 2015, 12:05 am
7 comments; last on Nov 04, 2015

A Learning Moment - Hopefully

Beware walking RR tracks on the Fairhaven waterfront in the event of unexpected encounter with a high speed train

John Servais
Sun, Sep 13, 2015, 8:42 am
2 comments; last on Sep 18, 2015

Chiara D’Angelo comes down from anchor chain

Young Chiara spent 3 nights hanging from the anchor chain of Shell Oil's Arctic Challenger as a protest to arctic oil drilling.

John Servais
Mon, May 25, 2015, 7:17 pm

A Perspective on Port Politics

The port's latest bone-headed deal calls for the good citizens of Whatcom County to consider the options...unless we're enjoying our Groundhog Day.

John Servais
Sat, Apr 04, 2015, 12:15 pm
3 comments; last on Apr 07, 2015

Port Gives Away Our Bellingham Waterfront

Port of Bellingham today sold out our public waterfront to a foreign shell company formed 6 days ago. Sold it cheap and with a screwy arrangement.

John Servais
Tue, Mar 31, 2015, 11:20 pm
32 comments; last on Apr 05, 2015

Robyn du Pre` Has Passed On

Add your thoughts and remembrances. Robyn du Pre` was a stalwart and true environmental advocate for Bellingham and Whatcom County. She died this week.

John Servais
Thu, Mar 12, 2015, 12:06 pm
9 comments; last on Mar 23, 2015

Ship Breaks Loose at Port of Bellingham

The Horizon Lines ship - the many year resident of the Port of Bellingham - broke loose this morning due to failure of some system. A few photos.

John Servais
Tue, Dec 09, 2014, 12:31 pm
3 comments; last on Dec 10, 2014

Action Alert for Tonight: Waterfront Wildlife and Habitat Threatened

The public needs to support city council and request that a waterfront habitat assessment include terrestrial species and habitat connectivity.

Wendy Harris
Mon, Apr 21, 2014, 10:43 am

Reid Boiler Works Burns Down

The old empty Reid Boiler Works industrial building in Fairhaven burned to the ground Saturday night.

John Servais
Sun, Feb 09, 2014, 9:13 am

Port’s Alternative Marina Analysis a Scam

Do we actually need to say that we, as citizens, want accurate information from government officials?

Guest writer
Tue, Jan 14, 2014, 2:19 pm
1 comments; last on Jan 14, 2014

Port Memo Addresses Marina Fraud Allegations

A Port of Bellingham internal memo tries, but fails, to justify changes in cost estimates for alternative marina sites.

Wendy Harris
Fri, Dec 20, 2013, 3:56 pm
5 comments; last on Dec 22, 2013

On Monday, City Council Votes “third and final” Approval of Waterfront Plan

Local activist calls on Bellingham City Council to table the unpopular waterfront plans and engage in meaningful public process

Wendy Harris
Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 12:33 pm
2 comments; last on Dec 08, 2013

Video Exposes City Council Dysfunction on Waterfront Plan

The Political Junkie has posted a 3 minute video showing Bellingham City Council members explaining their idiocy for all of us to watch.

John Servais
Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 11:58 am
2 comments; last on Dec 06, 2013

Cascadia Weekly Blasts Waterfront Plan

Bellingham City Council and Port of Bellingham finalize the waterfront plan. In his weekly Gristle, Tim Johnson blasts the corrupt public process.

John Servais
Wed, Dec 04, 2013, 10:53 am
4 comments; last on Dec 05, 2013

Port Unable To Protect Public Safety

If the port can not construct the airport safely, should it be entrusted with dangerous waterfront cleanup work?

Wendy Harris
Fri, Nov 22, 2013, 9:01 pm

Election Analysis: What Happened with the Port Races?

Riley crunches the numbers on Renata and McAuley's races to find answers

Riley Sweeney
Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 10:21 am
2 comments; last on Nov 14, 2013

Election Results - November 2013

With lots of outside county money flowing in to our local races, this election is weird. But real - and we county residents have spoken.

John Servais
Tue, Nov 05, 2013, 8:21 pm
11 comments; last on Nov 09, 2013

Boulevard Park Reopens

Beach reconstruction is done at Boulevard Park on the Bellingham waterfront. Paths along shore are again open - and it looks good.

John Servais
Sat, Oct 26, 2013, 7:36 pm
6 comments; last on Nov 02, 2013

Ken Bell and Renata for Port

Ken Bell has my vote over Mike McAuley for port commissioner. And Renata Kowalczyk has it over Dan Robbins.

John Servais
Sun, Oct 20, 2013, 7:07 pm
8 comments; last on Oct 30, 2013

Treaty Rights and Public Rights Ignored In Overwater Walkway

The city staff considers the overwater walkway a done deal before official approval or resolution of treaty right conflicts

Wendy Harris
Tue, Oct 08, 2013, 2:22 pm
4 comments; last on Oct 16, 2013

How the Coal Industry Funneled $40,000 into Whatcom

Riley uncovers how the Coal Industry is funding conservative candidates in Whatcom County

Riley Sweeney
Wed, Oct 02, 2013, 5:40 am
11 comments; last on Oct 03, 2013

Wildlife Impacts Missing In COB Waterfront District EIS

The city and port have not addressed wildlife impacts from waterfront development and this should be done before a waterfront plan is enacted.

Wendy Harris
Sat, Sep 28, 2013, 5:05 pm

Over $330,000 raised and spent on elections in Whatcom County

Riley examines who is donating to which candidates

Riley Sweeney
Thu, Sep 19, 2013, 6:08 am

Sen. Doug Ericksen Co-opts rather than Cooperate

Riley Sweeney examines Sen. Ericksen's legislative methods

Riley Sweeney
Fri, Jun 28, 2013, 6:29 am

Who is filing for elective offices???

Tuesday morning and nothing in today's Bellingham Herald. Nor online. We provide the basics to fill in this latest omission by our "daily" newspaper.

John Servais
Fri, May 17, 2013, 4:44 pm
9 comments; last on May 24, 2013

Waterfront “Planned Action Ordinance” Limits Restoration and Public Input

The City Planning Department has included a technical document in the waterfront proposal without disclosing important impacts.

Wendy Harris
Tue, Mar 26, 2013, 8:59 pm
1 comments; last on Mar 30, 2013

Valuable Article in the Whatcom Watch

Wendy Harris writes about the proposed $8 million concrete bridge along the Bellingham waterfront - using Greenways funds to build.

John Servais
Sun, Mar 17, 2013, 8:42 pm
3 comments; last on Mar 20, 2013

Waterfront EIS Revised Without Public Process

An "Updated Preferred Alternative" reduces the number of waterfront jobs and expands the boundary of the waterfront district.

Wendy Harris
Tue, Feb 19, 2013, 9:40 pm

Stealth Politics Returns

The Whatcom county Voters’ Pamphlet containing misleading and untrue statements by unregistered, unaccountable and anonymous front groups.

Paul deArmond
Sun, Nov 04, 2012, 9:21 am
3 comments; last on Nov 06, 2012

Election Predictions

Here's your shot at fame and glory as a political pundit

Riley Sweeney
Wed, Oct 31, 2012, 7:29 am
4 comments; last on Nov 02, 2012

Why Vote for Five Port Commissioners

Harriet Spanel and Ken Hertz on why we should vote YES to increase the Port of Bellingham to 5 commissioners.

Guest writer
Mon, Oct 01, 2012, 11:07 pm
3 comments; last on Oct 05, 2012

The Political Junkie interviews “Power Past Coal”

Riley sits down with Matt Petryni with Power Past Coal to get the latest scoop

Riley Sweeney
Mon, Aug 20, 2012, 8:00 am

Efforts to save the Granary building

Graphics projected on building each night in effort to bring attention to threatened building

John Servais
Fri, Aug 03, 2012, 11:18 pm
3 comments; last on Aug 11, 2012

Motivated Reasoning Yields Useless Planning

Where a planning staff desire for view corridors in the Fairhaven plan yields a view corridor that does nothing for views.

John Servais
Mon, Jul 23, 2012, 6:05 pm
1 comments; last on Jul 25, 2012

Surprise Port Meeting on Thursday

A special - short notice - Port of Bellingham Commission meeting on Thursday, June 28 starting at 8:30 a.m.

John Servais
Wed, Jun 27, 2012, 12:46 pm
6 comments; last on Jul 03, 2012

Port attempts to kill initiative for two new seats

Port Commissioner Scott Walker and attorney Frank Chmelik get caught ballot-rigging again

Paul deArmond
Sun, Jun 17, 2012, 8:52 am
20 comments; last on Jun 22, 2012

Port Commissioners Secretly Meddling

Port Commissioners plan to change their Port Expansion resolution on Tuesday - based on advice from port attorney Chmelik. No notice of this item on the agenda.

John Servais
Mon, Jun 04, 2012, 4:51 pm
6 comments; last on Jun 06, 2012

Cascadia Weekly again on target with the Port

In today's Cascadia Weekly, Tim Johnson analyses the Port Commissioner meeting and the shenanigans of Walker and Chmelik.

John Servais
Wed, May 16, 2012, 3:15 pm

Port Commission Expansion to be on November Ballot

Port Commissioners McAuley and Jorgensen voted to put on November ballot the question of expanding commission from 3 to 5 members.

John Servais
Mon, May 14, 2012, 5:07 pm
5 comments; last on May 15, 2012

Cascadia Weekly Rips Port - Urges 5

Today's Cascadia Weekly rips the Port staff on changed waterfront plans and sees 5 commissioners as possible solution to poor decision making.

John Servais
Wed, May 09, 2012, 5:11 am
2 comments; last on May 10, 2012

Port 5 - Hour of Audio Information

The Joe Show had John Servais on the air for a full hour on Thursday - and we link to the pod cast.

John Servais
Thu, May 03, 2012, 8:23 pm
3 comments; last on May 05, 2012

New Facebook Page for Port Reform

Bellingham Port Reform has a Facebook page, courtesy of Tip Johnson.

John Servais
Tue, May 01, 2012, 9:24 am
1 comments; last on May 02, 2012

Port Loses New Boat Builder Tenant

Port of Bellingham signed lease a month ago to hoopla and now the boat builder is exiting for Anacortes.

John Servais
Tue, May 01, 2012, 8:34 am
11 comments; last on May 09, 2012

Speakers to address Port on Tuesday

Several people will be urging the Port of Bellingham commissioners to place the question of expanding to 5 commissioners on the ballot.

John Servais
Mon, Apr 30, 2012, 9:54 pm

5 Port Commissioners Initiative Now Circulating

A county wide initiative will allow voters to decide whether to expand the Port of Bellingham commission from 3 to 5 commissioners.

John Servais
Sat, Apr 28, 2012, 9:09 am
1 comments; last on Apr 28, 2012

Charlie Sheldon has Herald Op-Ed

Today's Bellingham Herald carries an article from Sheldon, with facts, falsehoods and his perspective on his forced resignation as Executive Director of the Port of Bellingham.

John Servais
Tue, Apr 24, 2012, 8:25 am

Video of port commissioners is posted

A 26 minute video of the port commissioners explaining their positions on the firing of executive director Charlie Sheldon is posted.

John Servais
Wed, Apr 18, 2012, 11:28 am
7 comments; last on Apr 19, 2012

Port Meeting Today, Tuesday, at 3 p.m.

At 3 p.m. today - Tuesday, April 17 - the Port of Bellingham meets. Let's attend and support rehiring Charlie Sheldon.

John Servais
Tue, Apr 17, 2012, 11:51 am
3 comments; last on Apr 18, 2012

Jim Jorgensen May Reverse His Vote

Friday update: Herald reports Jim Jorgensen could change his mind on firing of Port of Bellingham Executive Director Charlie Sheldon

John Servais
Fri, Apr 13, 2012, 4:47 pm
3 comments; last on Apr 17, 2012

Two Port Commissioners Held Illegal Meeting

An illegal serial Port Commission meeting should be investigated by the State Auditor, and two commissioners should be made accountable for their actions.

John Servais
Tue, Apr 10, 2012, 7:52 pm
5 comments; last on Apr 11, 2012

Petition to Keep Charlie Sheldon is Online

An Online petition has been posted where citizens can sign on to request the Port Commissioners revote on Charlie Sheldon's termination.

John Servais
Thu, Apr 05, 2012, 3:00 pm
5 comments; last on Apr 06, 2012

We Can Expand Port Commission to Five

State law allows us to pass an initiative and increase the number of port commissioners from three to five. Thanks to Harriet Spanel.

John Servais
Wed, Apr 04, 2012, 2:16 pm
4 comments; last on Apr 05, 2012

Two Commissioners Demanded Charlie Resign

Port Commissioner Mike McAuley did everything he could do to change Jim Jorgensen's mind. Jim and Scott Walker forced Charlie Sheldon out.

John Servais
Tue, Apr 03, 2012, 5:25 pm
6 comments; last on Apr 06, 2012

Charlie Sheldon resigns as Port Director

This morning, Charlie Sheldon, unexpectedly resigned as Executive Director of the Port of Bellingham.

John Servais
Mon, Apr 02, 2012, 11:35 am
10 comments; last on Apr 03, 2012

Port attempts to kill initiative for two new seats

Port Commissioner Scott Walker and attorney Frank Chmelik get caught ballot-rigging again

Paul deArmond
Tue, Jan 31, 2012, 8:36 am

Morning after thoughts on the election

Will close races shift to the other candidate? Just how many ballots are left to count? When will we know for sure?

John Servais
Wed, Nov 09, 2011, 9:31 am
1 comments; last on Nov 09, 2011

Charlie Sheldon reorganizes Port staff

Charlie Sheldon shifts Port staff to help economic development of private business and to support needed infrastructure.

John Servais
Wed, Oct 19, 2011, 8:16 pm
4 comments; last on Oct 23, 2011

Scott Walker asks for Charlie Sheldon’s resignation

Bellingham Port Commissioner Scott Walker motioned for the port to ask Executive Director Charlie Sheldon to resign.

John Servais
Wed, Oct 19, 2011, 12:13 am
5 comments; last on Oct 20, 2011

From the Political Junkie: Why is Dan Pike talking about Coal Trains?

Look at the title, it spells it out.

Riley Sweeney
Thu, Sep 08, 2011, 9:37 am
6 comments; last on Sep 13, 2011

From the Political Junkie: A Petree-Eye View of Downtown

Riley interviews Clayton Petree about his view of Downtown Bellingham

Riley Sweeney
Tue, Aug 09, 2011, 4:44 pm
6 comments; last on Aug 12, 2011


About NWCitizen

Donate to help support

Our writers
Thru the years

League of Women Voters

Feb 16 - Water discussion

Feb 25 - Up voter turnout

Local Online News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Business Journal
Bham Politics & Econ
Cascadia Weekly
Coal Stop
Ferndale Record
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
Noisy Waters
Northern Light
Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut C. Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Powder River Basin R. C.
RE Sources
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice

Our Governments

- Whatcom County

Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US House
US Senate
US Supreme Court
US The White House
WA State
Whatcom COG

NWCitizen 1995-2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
EPIC World Photos
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That?

Local Leisure

Adventures NW

Bellingham Wins
Entertainment NNW
Recreation Northwest

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Change The Mascot
Common Dreams
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Drudge Report
Edge of Sports
Foreign Policy in Focus
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Huffington Post
Innocence Project
Irish Times
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Sea Shepherd
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
War and Piece
Washington Votes

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register

Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Jack Petree
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Protect Bellingham Parks
Sweeney Politics
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders