Chapter 2:  Playing the race card

Permalink +

Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 9:02 pm  //  Dick Conoboy

After the “Shout Down” by Council President Pinky Vargas on August 8, Anne Mackie and Dick Conoboy received the following email from Council Member April Barker, author of the motion to remove “owner occupancy” requirements for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) in single-family neighborhoods. Bellingham’s working class neighborhoods have no protective covenants to prevent absentee owners from converting backyards into more rental units.

Hello Anne and Dick,

Thank you for your comments to Council during public comment. I heard your concerns. In the future, please remember, my interests lie in looking at all these issues through a race equity lens. 

Using 'owner-occupied' language in policy must be very intentional, as it can be perceived, and has been used historically, as exclusionary. Absolutely, there are places in the City that are subject to predatory developers and leasing agents that would warrant adding this restrictive language. However, there may be circumstances where the language wouldn't match the intent of the zoning. Or maybe in areas that have grown to be very exclusive, removing the language could add opportunity for inclusion. 

As you know this Comprehensive Plan was not noticed as to discuss an ADU ordinance. Thus, many were not aware of the opportunity to be heard. Because of this, leaving the language in the Comp Plan would have been irresponsible of the Council and thwarted the public process. Had the tables been turned, many would have felt blindsided with language that bound the Council's hands to not allow for restrictive language in a future ordinance.

I am confident we will have a very dynamic discussion when the ordinance comes forward to Council for consideration. Then we can decide what language is appropriate for where.

As always, please call or email if you would like further clarification or what to discuss your concerns and ideas. Feel free to share my email with your Neighborhood Associations.

April Barker
City Council Member, Ward 1

Anne Mackie’s response to April Barker and other members of the Council, August 15.

Dear Bellingham City Council Members:

The ongoing discussion about our city's Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, and specifically the recent majority Council vote to remove the "owner occupancy" requirement for ADUs, has degenerated into accusations toward citizens who disagree with that vote. We have been unfairly characterized as not supporting "race equity," being "anti renters," and even not being supportive of "different people." These types of false accusations serve to intimidate citizens who wish to participate in the public debate about the Comprehensive Plan.  Using these kinds of tactics are harmful to the full participation of citizens. Being labeled as something we are not is inappropriate in a public discourse. What we are about is protecting opportunities for families to achieve home ownership and protect single family neighborhoods from being overrun by absentee landlords who serve to profit from an up-zone and a property gift from this zoning change. 

April Barker states: "my interests lie in looking at all these issues through a race equity lens."  She further states, that "owner occupied language" has been used "historically, as exclusionary."  The implication of her statement is that, somehow, neighborhoods or individuals who object to the removal of the "owner occupancy" requirement for ADUs in single family neighborhoods are not in support of "race equity."  That is, someone such as myself who supports the "owner occupancy" zoning requirement is somehow racially exclusionary? 

A second example of Ms. Barker's false accusations happened during the August 1, 2016, City Council meeting when she stated that people are "mistaken that renters are bad. They aren't." Again, this was in the context of her arguments to remove "owner occupancy" as a requirement for ADUs in single family zones. I, and others who are opposed to removing this requirement, worked for over 15 years to get renters' rights for safe housing through the Rental Registration and Inspection program.  We certainly should not be unfairly characterized by Ms. Barker as "anti renters."

A third example of Ms. Barker's false accusations occurred during the June 20, 2016, City Council meeting in which she expresses concerns that people who do not support removal of the owner-occupancy requirement for ADUs in single family zones are not supportive of "making room for different housing types and different people." In that meeting (video time slot 51:01) Barker is addressing the issue of the murderous rampage by the individual who attacked the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, FL, on June 12, 2016.  During this portion of the meeting Council members Vargas, Knutson, Murphy, and Barker expressed opinions about the Orlando tragedy.  It was a highly-charged moment in the meeting. For all of America, it was an emotional and terrifying event. For myself, the proud mother of a married LGBT couple, it was excruciatingly terrifying because I have loved ones who have been and will continue to be the target of bigotry. 

Ms. Barker turned this tragedy into an opportunity to express her opinion about people who do not support the dismantling of single family zoning by allowing non-owner occupied ADUs, as people who do not want to make room for "different people" in our neighborhoods. Connecting the Orlando murder rampage to the issue of ADUs in Bellingham is nothing but opportunism on her part.  The tactic of using a "straw man" is nothing but a debate tool designed to falsely characterize one's opponents.  Ms. Barker's false accusations toward citizens who disagree with her position is, in my opinion, not acceptable behavior for an elected official.

I am waiting to be accused of being anti-single mothers and children, as well; but before that false insinuation is stated, let me set the record straight.  I have been one of those single mothers and I have been a political activist for 50 years in the women's liberation, pro-choice, civil rights movement, pro-LGBT, and labor movements. I can stand on my record and am proud of it. 

I was the target of rude behavior by Council President Vargas and Council member Murphy during the August 8, 2016, meeting -- with giggling and laughing while I spoke -- and then I was shouted down when I exceeded the three minute time limit by 30 seconds. Unlike members of the real estate and building industry, who frequently exceed the three-minute time limit, I was not afforded the simple courtesy to be allowed to wrap up my remarks. 

This action, now coupled with the attached letter from Ms. Barker and her previously recorded false accusations toward citizens who disagree with her position, serves to intimidate and stifle public participation in a process that must be open to public discourse.  I believe that public discourse on the Comprehensive Plan update is protected by law and the Washington State Growth Management Act. 

Please advise me as to how you, as a Council, will correct these injuries to myself and other citizens who are attempting to exercise our rights to be heard.

Anne Mackie

Dick Conoboy’s response to April and other members of the city council, 16 April 2016.


Thanks for taking time to respond to the concerns from me and Anne Mackie about removing the ‘owner-occupied’ language in the Comp Plan section addressing ADU’s. 
I stand with Anne’s reflection in her message […] on your lens of “race equity” which implies that those of us who are fighting hard to maintain the character of our neighborhoods are somehow not interested or ignoring the equity issue.  I do not find that approach productive.
Personally, I have been dealing with equity issues my entire life from an early age when my family could not buy into a neighborhood a block away where Jews and Negroes were specifically excluded.  My mother was a Jew.  For all my childhood from my non-Jewish “friends”, I constantly heard talk of kikes and yids from these people who did not know my origins but thought I was an ally in their prejudices.  As a young boy I was severely physically handicapped which led to a decade or more of physical and psychological difficulties, ignored by my parochial school educators who had little sense of compassion or equity. I spent nearly a decade in the 70s and 80s working for recognition of sexual stereotyping as it affects males in our society only to receive the sneers and vitriol of the feminists of the time.  With little or no help (and at times active opposition) from city council and city hall, I fought for nearly ten years along with Anne to get licensing and inspection legislation to protect ALL renters regardless of race.  Yes, April, I know a few equity issues.
And now you indicate that the term ‘owner-occupied’ “can be perceived, and has been used historically, as exclusionary” (i.e., not consistent with race equality).  I fail to see the nexus between requirement for owner occupancy and anything to do with race.  At your convenience, would you please provide a few examples of where owner-occupied ADU’s has been found to be racist?
If you want to probe equity issues, you need to talk to the landlords (the rentier class), resident or often absentee, who have bought up properties by the dozens that they now rent at exorbitant prices while taking homes out of the market that might have been available to potential home buyers of more modest means.  You need to talk to the Realtors who fail to enforce their own code of ethics to police the outrageous behavior of those landlords and property managers who regularly flaunt the laws of the city.  You need to talk to the builders and developers who will not consider affordable housing unless they get their expected tax break or fee relief to ensure maximum profits.  Where is their sense of equity?  Where is their sense of community?
The city also has to address the equity issue of a living wage such as they have done in the city of Seattle.  When will you be proposing to boost the minimum wage in Bellingham from the paltry state standard of $9.47 [$19,000/yr] to a true, living wage of $20 an hour? (Yes, not even $15/hour works when a house rents for $30.000 per year.  Do the math).  When will the council look at the price gouging in the rental market?  Is that not also an equity issue? [Note: Minimum wage requirements for some small businesses may require special attention.]

Additionally, you seem confused about what had been in the city’s comprehensive plan since 1995.  The ‘owner-occupied’ language was not being added to the comprehensive plan; it has been there for more than 20 years.  Rather, council’s vote removed this language from the comprehensive plan.  Your logic that the comprehensive plan was not “noticed” as to discuss an ADU ordinance actually supports leaving the comprehensive plan language as it has been for the past two decades.
The action to remove the owner occupancy requirement is little more than a not-so-subtle, back door rezone of all single family neighborhoods (except those lucky enough to have restrictive covenants which then turns ADU placement into a crap shoot).  You speak often of property rights.  Property rights extend to the individual homeowners as well as the landlords who are good at rent extraction but not much else. 



Related Links:

-> Temper Tantrum Taints City Council - by Anne and Dick

Thomas R. Scott  //  Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 11:24 pm

I wish I could feign shock at how civil discourse has faltered lately at many levels of government. Sadly, I cannot. The race card and double-talk at the national level have become the norm.

Our local politics have been tainted from time to time as well.  However, I see a new level of late.

First, insinuations and even more open charges of racism and amorphous phobias employed so as to shut up those earnestly disagreeing or questioning a given topic or decision. Then, logic is altered into double-speak or inverse logic.

Recent activities and statements (verbal and written) from at least a couple City Council members lately defy civil discourse through borderline to outright rude behavior crossing the line into physical confrontation. This followed by insinuations of racism, general exclusionism and double-speak.

Then Councilmember Barker turned logic on its head (in writing).  This was with regard to why removing “owner occupancy” for Auxiliary Dwelling Units (ADUs) in Single Family zoning without notice was the right thing to do.

As she writes two engaged citizens, she admits to a lack of notice with “As you know this Comprehensive Plan was not noticed as to discuss an ADU ordinance.” She continues to admit, “Thus, many were not aware of the opportunity to be heard.”

From a logic perspective, all fine and good so far. Yes, lack of notice logically results in lack of awareness. I would also add it results in a lack of “daylight” and openness (as required by law, but I digress).

Then the logic flips as she states, “Because of this, leaving the language in the Comp Plan” (as in NOT making a change) “would have been irresponsible of the Council and thwarted the public process.” She polishes that off with another inverse logic “Had the tables been turned, many would have felt blindsided…”

In the first inverse logic, a lack of notice is equated with the responsible need to make a change to the Comprehensive Plan language.  Normally a lack of notice, by logic and by law, must result in the status quo until a future time when notice is properly given as per the proper process. Apparently, Councilmember Barker believes otherwise.

She even slips in additional inverse logic by mentioning the “public process” which, by the way, requires notice.

In the second inverse logic musing, she somehow believes that a lack of change would have “blindsided” folks when nothing happened just when they expected nothing to happen. Logic dictates that nobody is blindsided when expectations are met.

If her intention was to NOT blindside the public, she, and other councilmembers failed miserably as most citizens paying attention were blindsided. (The possible/probable exception being some of her peers in the real estate, development and rental management communities. As I understand it, they were virtually the only persons who seemed in attendance at the meeting in question aside from City staff and the Council itself).

Again she WROTE this.  Apparently, this is her CONSIDERED opinion.  Time was taken to settle her thoughts. Write them down, reconsider them, spell check them and send them off.

I have two “take aways”:
1 - Logic and law dictate that, regardless of any merits, the motion to remove the language, thus, taking action without notice and proper process must be considered void due to the process violation.
2 - Attempts to bully erstwhile citizens taking part in the public process must stop immediately.

Tim Paxton  //  Wed, Aug 24, 2016, 2:39 am

This contemptible and illegal lack of public notice is a deliberate tactic by the City Executive branch and the legal staff.

Smells like big bribes are being protected by the City.  Nothing else explains their sudden intense interest in scamming the public.


David Camp  //  Wed, Aug 24, 2016, 8:14 am

Does it strike anyone else as passing strange that a City Councilor, supposed to represent the interests of the citizens who elected her, seems to believe that her sole role is to promote race equity? What else does this mean: “I heard your concerns. In the future, please remember, my interests lie in looking at all these issues through a race equity lens.”

So the April Barker Racial Equality Crusade trumps all citizen concerns - and if we little citizens dare criticize the saintly Ms. Barker and her selfless crusade for racial equality we must be filthy racists?

Junga Subedar  //  Wed, Aug 24, 2016, 1:16 pm

Thank you April Barker for your comment and insight on how the inclusion of “owner occupancy” for Accessory Dwelling Units can adversely affect some neighborhoods and people.

Marilyn Williams  //  Wed, Aug 24, 2016, 5:32 pm

Thank you Thomas for helping me understand what I thought had to be ignorance on my part, because I could not understand what April Barker meant when she said that it would be irresponsible and thwart the public process (so on). Inverse logic.

I, too, am concerned that this meeting was almost held in secret and a huge decision - a change to the comprehensive plan - was made without noticing the public. I must be old fashioned, because I always thought that public input was part of the process and a decision wasn’t made until all things were considered. And, what the public wanted was what we got. When did the rule become - “We The Government?”

Only one group is excluded with the “owner occupied” language and that group is not a protected group - investors. A return on investment is not a right.

This town sorely lacks equity. The growth machine has divided this town into ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ by telling those of us that worked hard, made tough choices and managed to hang on during many recession and life events, that we do not deserve to keep what we have. We do not deserve to enjoy the fruits of our labor, since that is selfish. We should instead give to those that want easy money by buying property and renting to people who need housing. Turning things around and making it about not sharing with renters.

FYI - I live in multifamily zoning. All I asked for was some decent design review, that required the buildings fit into the surrounding housing. But, even that was too exclusionary for the city of Bellingham. It limited the builders choices.

Tip Johnson  //  Thu, Aug 25, 2016, 2:28 pm

While sensitive to the need for careful consideration of race equity in the promulgation of city code, it does not justify the removal of the owner-occupied requirement for ADUs.  This requirement should apply to any owner of any property with ADU potential, without regard for race (color, creed, etc.).

ADUs have the potential to diversify our housing stock and provide more affordable housing solutions without public investment. This benefits anyone of lower income, regardless of race, etc.

There are many other advantages to ADUs, like helping homeowners make their nut, helping tenants save to buy, creating community with it’s helpful advantages, like “eyes on the property” security, like low-impact infill, etc.

I’m all for ADUs because we need to practice smarter housing.  We have gotten very good at enabling stupid housing, like the four+ bedroom duplex animal house student housing developments, or the seven bedroom single family homes managed as boarding houses, or the rabbit warren stack dorms where there isn’t even room to store a kayak.  I oppose the “not more than three unrelated by blood or marriage” rule because families have become far more diverse.  I think we need much more latitude in exploring housing that keeps folks off the streets and helps them toward better accommodations.  We have essentially legislated affordable housing out of existence.

However, when infilling one’s own backyard, supervision is critical to prevent common nuisances spilling into your neighbor’s or the general public.  This is not discriminatory in any way.  It’s just good management.

It makes me think there may be other, unspoken reasoning behind the change.


Chapter 2:  Playing the race card

Three emails: April Barker writes about ADUs and her perspective; Anne Mackie and Dick Conoboy respond.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 9:02 pm
6 comments; last on Aug 25, 2016

Temper Tantrum Taints City Council

Council President Pinky Vargas loses it over minor violations of the three-minute comment rule. Is this any way to run a council?

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Aug 15, 2016, 3:13 am
10 comments; last on Aug 23, 2016

Memorial Day 2016 - Thanking a True Soldier

This veteran, Chris Brown, deserves our deep thanks for his achievement with Growing Veterans as Executive Director, a post that he has left. He will continue as President…

Dick Conoboy
Thu, May 26, 2016, 5:23 am
3 comments; last on Jun 08, 2016

Reader paid for ads. Click to see all choices.

Singing the Comp Plan Blues

As the city council takes up consideration of the comprehensive plan, citizen input is critical. Otherwise in a few years and in response to housing and land use…

Dick Conoboy
Mon, May 23, 2016, 5:21 am

Uber: Supporting the Troops?

Uber, the cheap ride taxi company, is targeting the troops to become drivers in ads disguised as articles in publications such as the Army Times.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, May 16, 2016, 5:20 am

Report on City Council Retreat

The Bellingham City Council conducted a retreat on 16 April to discuss a number of issues, including a set of proposed strategies to ensure "sustainable services."

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Apr 19, 2016, 5:14 am

$15 Minimum Wage - Assured Debt Peonage

Accelerating efforts across the U.S. to install a $15 minimum wage are playing into the hands of big business and codifying enormously insufficient wages for years to come.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Apr 04, 2016, 5:25 am
2 comments; last on May 24, 2016

Durham, NH, - Surprise! - Rental Inspections Worked

Durham is an example of the efficacy of rental inspections, putting to bed the unsupported objections of landlords by presenting facts about conditions.

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Mar 09, 2016, 2:20 pm
1 comments; last on Mar 12, 2016

Stop the Rental Fires Now!

Inspections of rentals cannot begin too soon. Seven fires in rental units since 2011 and almost half with ONE landlord. No but the clock may be running out.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Feb 08, 2016, 6:26 am

Super Bowl 50 - Wretched Excess

From all the monumentally boring hoopla to the shameful rousting of the homeless Super Bowl 50 exceeds all expectations for greed and excess.

Dick Conoboy
Fri, Feb 05, 2016, 12:45 pm
4 comments; last on Feb 12, 2016

Mayor Picks Lisa Anderson for City Planning Commission

Lisa Anderson will fill the remaining term of real estate broker, Cerise Noah. who left the Bellingham Planning Commission several months ago.

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Feb 03, 2016, 2:53 pm

Say Nein to Uber

Uber has started a new type of public taxi service in many cities, including Bellingham. It is controversial.

Dick Conoboy
Sun, Jan 31, 2016, 12:04 pm
3 comments; last on Feb 04, 2016

WA State Minimum Wage Initiative - A Race To The Bottom

Raising the minimum wage to $13.50/hr by 2020 cements workers into permanent slave wages that cannot pay the bills.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Jan 18, 2016, 6:35 am
1 comments; last on Jan 20, 2016

Planning Commission Opening Calls for Neighborhood Rep

The Planning Commission has a vacancy. Now is the time for the appointment of a member who represents the interests of the neighborhoods.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Nov 30, 2015, 6:29 am

Update on Lincoln Street Student Housing Project

The student housing project for 648 individuals called NXNW (North by Northwest) on Lincoln Street is moving forward briskly. This is an update.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Nov 23, 2015, 6:41 am
7 comments; last on Dec 27, 2015

Accessory Dwelling Units - There Is No Rush

There is no reason to rush an updated ordinance on ADUs when we do not even know what the current number is or where existing illegal units are…

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Nov 16, 2015, 5:30 am
9 comments; last on Dec 10, 2015

Veterans Day and Thanking Veterans

Some personal thoughts on thanking our veterans for their service

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Nov 11, 2015, 5:23 am
1 comments; last on Nov 11, 2015

Growing Veterans

Growing Veterans was created to empower military veterans to grow food, communities, and each other.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Nov 02, 2015, 9:04 am
2 comments; last on Nov 04, 2015

$15/hr Minimum Wage - Seriously?

Moves to set the minimum wage to $15, even if successful, are woefully insufficient. And why aren't people speaking out about abusive work scheduling?

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Aug 19, 2015, 5:00 am
2 comments; last on Sep 17, 2015

The Hansen’s Giant Rental Megaplex - Part 2

While the city deals with permitting on the Hansen rental megaplexes, the council has asked for proposals from staff on design standards for historic areas.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Aug 04, 2015, 10:14 am
9 comments; last on Aug 08, 2015

Kudos to Our Police

Bellingham police are obviously trained to de-escalate armed confrontations. This is the way it should be.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Jul 13, 2015, 5:38 am
6 comments; last on Jul 14, 2015

Family Home For Rent: $44,000/year

For Rent: York neighborhood, new, 7 bedroom single-family home, near WWU. Only $44,000 a year. City planning not paying attention.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Jul 07, 2015, 5:34 am
6 comments; last on Jul 09, 2015

Fireworks and Clay Butler

If your 4th of July holiday is much more quiet this year, you can thank Clay Bulter who passed away at the end of May.

Dick Conoboy
Thu, Jul 02, 2015, 7:47 am

A Tale of Three Rezones

The Samish Neighborhood Plan has been the subject of three undesired rezones in the last year. The city ignores its own guidelines to the detriment of all.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Jun 29, 2015, 5:00 am

Hansen-Iron Street Rental Megaplex Planned for York Neighborhood

Three extraordinarily large (7-bedroom) single family home rentals are proposed by developers Dave and Jon Hansen on Iron St. in the York Neighborhood.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Jun 01, 2015, 3:49 am
7 comments; last on Jun 10, 2015

Student Housing Project Revived for Lincoln St. Development Site

The Puget Neighborhood is about to become a bit more crowded but less than originally planned. 600+ students to be housed south of Fred Meyer.

Dick Conoboy
Thu, Apr 09, 2015, 5:03 am
6 comments; last on Apr 12, 2015

County Meth Ordinance Sent Back to Committee

The Whatcom County Council has sent discussion on changing the meth ordinance back to the Public Works, Health and Safety Committee

Dick Conoboy
Fri, Mar 13, 2015, 5:00 am

Dealing with Meth Contamination - A Race to the Bottom in Whatcom County

In a hearing, possibly on 3 March, the Whatcom County Council will consider an ordinance changing the rules for contaminated meth use sites.

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Feb 25, 2015, 6:31 am
1 comments; last on Feb 27, 2015

Rent-to-Own Scam on Tenants

Not all rent-to-own propositions are an unwise method to buy a home but some are schemes to rip off the unsuspecting tenant.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Feb 09, 2015, 6:00 am

Bellingham City Council Approves Rental Inspections

7-0! City Council Unanimous. Rentals Will Be Inspected in Bellingham. Thanks go to WWU students for speaking out to city council.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Dec 16, 2014, 3:51 pm
5 comments; last on May 03, 2015

Council Moving Rapidly on Rental Registration and Inspections

The Bellingham City Council has added an inspection component to the registration-only rental ordinance proposal of Councilmember Murphy

Dick Conoboy
Thu, Dec 11, 2014, 5:05 am
4 comments; last on Dec 16, 2014

New Year’s Eve and Consumer Fireworks - Ban in Effect

The ban on consumer fireworks that took effect last summer is valid all year, even New Year's Eve

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Dec 10, 2014, 6:37 am
1 comments; last on Dec 11, 2014

Campus View Apartment Project Officially Defunct

Campus Crest Communities, Inc. has officially offered for sale the Lincoln St. property that was to be a student apartment development.

Dick Conoboy
Thu, Nov 20, 2014, 9:15 am
2 comments; last on Nov 24, 2014

Lincoln Street Apartment Development May Be Abandoned

The Campus Crest apartment complex may be the "victim" of a corporate restructuring plan.

Dick Conoboy
Thu, Nov 06, 2014, 6:53 am
3 comments; last on Nov 10, 2014

Rental Conditions -  A Real Estate Inspector’s View

An experienced real estate inspector provides a window to the dangeroous conditions found in rentals in Bellingham

Dick Conoboy
Fri, Oct 03, 2014, 10:26 am
3 comments; last on Oct 05, 2014

Hickory, Dickory, Docketing…Yet Another Spot Rezone

Last Thursday, the Planning Commission voted to recommend the docketing of the spot rezone of 801 Samish from Residential Single to Commerical Planned (non-retail)

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Sep 22, 2014, 5:07 am
6 comments; last on Oct 03, 2014

Councilmember Murphy’s Proposed Rental Ordinance Is Deeply Flawed

Councilmember Murphy's proposal is based on a complaint-based rental ordinance from Tacoma, demonstrated to do little for the health and safety of tenants.

Dick Conoboy
Fri, Aug 01, 2014, 8:00 am
14 comments; last on Oct 01, 2014

Plan Commission & Samish Neighbors Bypassed on Rezone Docketing

In contravention of the Bellingham Municipal Code, the City Council will consider on 4 August a last minute docketing request that ignores the Planning Commission and Samish Neighborhood.

Dick Conoboy
Thu, Jul 24, 2014, 7:52 am
1 comments; last on Jul 31, 2014

Intrado Not to Intrude in Bellingham

The city council "persuades" the city administration to withdraw a request for an intrusive police threat warning system

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Jul 08, 2014, 8:20 am
2 comments; last on Jul 09, 2014

DOJ Grant Brings Confusion and Anger to City Council Meeting

The Bellingham Police Department wants to purchase "threat assessment" software with federal monies. Citizen comments were vehement and negative. City Council confused.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 10:24 am
5 comments; last on Jul 03, 2014

Fireworks Ban in Bellingham in Effect as of 18 June

The possession and use of consumer fireworks are no longer permitted within the city limits.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Jun 17, 2014, 7:53 am
1 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014

Planning or Development Commission?

Every Bellingham Planning Commission member has ties to development or development-related businesses.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Apr 28, 2014, 6:28 am
4 comments; last on Apr 30, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XII - Citizens Win Against University Ridge

Ambling University Development Group pulls out. University Ridge will not be built.

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Apr 02, 2014, 6:00 am
12 comments; last on Apr 06, 2014

Is ALEC Jr. Coming to Whatcom County or Bellingham Soon?

The infamous American Legislative Exchange Council plans to send its spawn to cities and counties throughout the U.S.

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Mar 12, 2014, 8:28 am
1 comments; last on Mar 24, 2014

Panem et Circenses - Why I Did Not Watch “The Super Bowl”

Professional and even college sports have morphed into a circus of corporate greed and the fleecing of the public.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Feb 03, 2014, 6:30 am
3 comments; last on Mar 02, 2014

Anatomy of a Development Part XI - The Doldrums at University Ridge

The developers of University Ridge have been silent since shortly after the hearing examiner's decision on 23 October last year. Will they walk?

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Jan 20, 2014, 6:14 am

The Bellingham “Riot” - Let’s Expand the Conversation

The post "riot" conversation is terribly lacking in several areas. We must expand the discussion or risk learning little from the experience.

Dick Conoboy
Thu, Dec 05, 2013, 6:00 am
3 comments; last on Dec 15, 2013

Walmart and McDonald’s - Partners in Institutionalized Cluelessness

The advice coming from Walmart and McDonald's to its low paid employees becomes more and more bizarre and inane.

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Nov 20, 2013, 6:03 am

Anatomy of a Development - Part X Appeals of the Hearing Examiner’s Decision

Ambling's motion to the hearing examiner for reconsideration was definitively rejected. The developer has not met the deadline for an appeal to the Superior Court

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Nov 19, 2013, 6:35 am

Puget Neighborhood Likely New Home for 1,300 Students

Puget Neighborhood will likely have in the immediate future 1,300 new rental units that will be marketed primarily to the student population.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 6:16 am

Health Insurance Scams - Washington Not Spared

The call of the dollar speaks more loudly to health insurance companies than does the voice and well-being of the consumer, even here in Washington.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Nov 04, 2013, 10:55 am
8 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013

Anatomy of a Development - Part IX BMC Rule of Three Thwarts Plans

Four bedroom dorm rooms have been nixed by the hearing examiner. University Ridge may be in trouble as a cash cow for Ambling Development of Georgia

Dick Conoboy
Thu, Oct 31, 2013, 11:19 am
3 comments; last on Nov 04, 2013

Dick’s Picks for City Council - Burr and Petree

Independent voters are for independent thinkers on the city council. Vote for Burr and Petree.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Oct 28, 2013, 1:00 am

Anatomy of a Development Proposal - Part VIII The 12 October Riot and University Ridge

The development of University Ridge will replicate the student ghetto that fueled the riot on 12 October.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Oct 15, 2013, 4:16 pm
6 comments; last on Oct 25, 2013

Anatomy of a Development Proposal - Part VII The Hearing on University Ridge

Hearing held on 11 September. Comment period extended 10 days. Effects on home owners already manifest.

Dick Conoboy
Fri, Sep 20, 2013, 8:09 am
8 comments; last on Sep 23, 2013

Anatomy of a Development Proposal - Part VI Hearing Examiner Date Set - A Broken Process

The University Ridge process works only to the benefit of the developers. The public is offered tight deadlines and insufficient information.

Dick Conoboy
Mon, Aug 26, 2013, 5:00 am
1 comments; last on Sep 21, 2013

Anatomy of a Development Proposal - Part V The SEPA Determination

The University Ridge dormitory development approval process is broken. The City Council should act.

Dick Conoboy
Fri, Aug 16, 2013, 5:00 am
1 comments; last on Aug 17, 2013

Charter Schools Redux - Primary Election for School Board upon Us

Candidates for the Bellingham School Board need to let us know where they stand on charter schools.

Dick Conoboy
Tue, Jul 23, 2013, 11:22 am
3 comments; last on Aug 06, 2013

Anatomy of a Development Proposal - Part I The Variance

A variance request without merit is the centerpiece of a development proposal to construct a complex of four dormitory-style buildings among single family homes in the Puget Neighborhood

Dick Conoboy
Wed, Jun 26, 2013, 8:04 pm

D-Day 6 June 2013

D-Day forgotten.

Dick Conoboy
Thu, Jun 06, 2013, 6:30 pm


We Thank Our Sponsors

Click to See All Sponsors

About NWCitizen

Donations maintain site

Our writers
Thru the years

League of Women Voters

Calendar of Events

Home page
Videos of Districting Committee

Local Online News

Bellingham Herald

Bham Business Journal
Bham Politics & Econ
Cascadia Weekly
Coal Stop
Ferndale Record
KPLU fm radio
Latte Republic
Lynden Tribune
Noisy Waters
Northern Light
Seattle Times
Twilight Zoning
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Chuckanut C. Forest

City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bham
Conservation NW
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Powder River Basin R. C.
RE Sources
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice

Our Governments

- Whatcom County

Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US House
US Senate
US Supreme Court
US The White House
WA State
Whatcom COG

NWCitizen 1995-2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Climate Audit
EPIC World Photos
Nat Hurricane Center
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That?

Local Leisure

Adventures NW

Bellingham Wins
Entertainment NNW
Recreation Northwest

Good Web Sites

Al-Jazeera online

Alaska Dispatch
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Change The Mascot
Common Dreams
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Drudge Report
Edge of Sports
Foreign Policy in Focus
Gulf News
Huffington Post
Innocence Project
Irish Times
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Sea Shepherd
Stand for the Troops
Ta-Nehisi Coates
Talking Points Memo
The Crisis Papers
The Intercept
the Oatmeal
War and Piece
Washington Votes

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register

Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Bob Sanders
Carl Weimer
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizen Ted
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
David Hackworth
Facebook Port Reform
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Jack Petree
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Protect Bellingham Parks
Sweeney Politics
The American Telegraph
Wally Wonders