Little Hong Kong by the BayPermalink +
Thu, Jan 29, 2015, 9:56 pm // Tip Johnson
Most understand that the reason the Port and City went through such gyrations over so many years (with so little result) was to wear citizens down until officials could replace our Waterfront Futures vision with their little Hong Kong on the Bay fantasy. Few understand that Harcourt is just like the derelict Horizon ship tied to the derelict international shipping pier to create the illusion of a functional port. Harcourt is intended to keep things tied up in complicated deals and/or litigation until the roughly tax$30 million we put into the AIG insurance policy has matured to a level sufficient to cover remediation AND make AIG money. That's why we will keep studying for the ever lower cost remedial alternatives the Port agreed to accept.
So, anyone still interested in an expanded commission?
How about a crowdsource funding campaign to hire a crack team of professional help to thoroughly dissect the mess? Many are tired of fighting the Port, or even trying to follow their shenanigans. Here's a proposal. Who's got talent? Who's got interest? Let's pay someone to do the dirty work. That's what the Port does! We can tax ourselves through crowdsource. The Port taxes us to do harm, why not tax ourselves to right the wrongs?
Bellingham Waterfront Public Interest Education Project ~
Exploring the Costs and Benefits of a Public vs Private Waterfront
Goals: 1) Investigate the Port of Bellingham's peculiar management of Bellingham's newly consolidated public waterfront, 2) Produce the highest quality information for citizens, auditors and prosecutors, and 3) Inventory issues that might be litigated or prosecuted. Estimated Cost (Phase I - III): $________ dollars.
Phase I: Fund a professional forensic public disclosure and analysis of public process, principles and procedures pertaining to the waterfront plan. Provide volunteer public interest opportunities for research and reporting.
Phase II: Fund professional public education exhibits and reports for citizens, auditors and prosecutors, including recommendations in the public's best interest.
Phase III: Fund professional education of legislative delegates, auditors and prosecutors, and explore civil litigation opportunities to assure an honest environmental clean-up and a continuing public waterfront.
Background: In 2001, Georgia-Pacific West ceased its Bellingham pulp, paper and integrated chemical operations. The Port of Bellingham bought G-P's waterfront land and environmental liabilities for $10, put almost $30 million dollars into an AIG environmental insurance account, agreed to adopt the lowest cost remedial alternative and promised not to prospect for further liabilities, even though approximately 500 tons of mercury remain unaccounted and numerous unregulated G-P landfills remain unexplored.
What we know so far:
- The Port intentionally managed the waterfront environmental review to prevent evaluating the benefits of using G-P's wastewater treatment facility for water treatment. They insist it become a yacht basin to complement upscale private waterfront condominiums. The Port has 500 empty slips in its moorage inventory.
- Eliminating G-P's treatment capacity orphans a large city-owned stainless steel industrial water supply and inhibits our ability to support jobs. It forecloses treatment options for industrial effluent and urban run-off. Municipalities will soon be mandated to install stormwater treatment. The City is currently spending $200 million expanding it's wastewater treatment plant and is out of room. Future capacity will come at much higher costs.
- The Port doctored public records, changing consultant estimates by over $21 million to make their preferred marina plan look falsely better than alternatives. Port staff admitted to this revision only after it was exposed in local publications.
- 14 public stakeholder agencies spent ten years developing 9 remedial alternatives for the removal of between 160,000 to 1,900,00 cubic yards of contaminated sediments. Within a month of buying the G-P site, the Port unilaterally imposed a tenth plan - Alternative 'K' - a capping plan that leaves most toxic sediments in place.
- Despite more than a decade having passed, almost no clean-up has occurred. Some analysts suggest that while the insurance policy remains unspent, AIG can afford to provide 'encouragements' to those who help delay. They suggest a forensic financial analysis of key Port staff is warranted.
- The Port insists on selling new waterfront lands for private development. They propose 6 million square feet of mixed-use, commercial/retail/residential development on the waterfront immediately adjacent to downtown. Only one million square feet at a local mall put downtown into a disastrous economic tailspin for more than two decades. The Port has avoided comparing the county-wide benefits of a generous, less developed public waterfront.
- The Port continues changing project parameters and ordering ongoing studies in a blinding fog of confusing public participation deadlines that have overwhelmed most concerned citizens. The documents are extremely technical and circularly self-referential. Qualified, professional scientific review and analysis is needed.
- Port-produced exhibits for public decision-makers have systematically shifted over time to obfuscate, conceal and minimize environmental liabilities, to eliminate earlier public priorities and to encourage maximum development.
- The Port and City sponsored a thoroughgoing public participation process, the Waterfront Futures Group, a citizen committee that produced well-framed public interest policies and principles. These were buried and ignored, replaced with a new "Framework and Assumptions", negotiated in private, radically expanding the project scope, but without affording the public opportunity to comment.
- The Port hired the world's preeminent waterfront redevelopment consultants, whose recommendations for a generous public waterfront they also completely ignored.
- A new Port Director, Charlie Sheldon, who questioned the wisdom of selling the waterfront for maximum development, and tried to steer the agency back toward more traditional port services and activities, was summarily dismissed in a sudden, notoriously opaque and procedurally questionable move that prompted a significant public response.
- Citizens mounted an initiative to increase the Port Commission in hopes of broader representation and better public outcomes. The Commission offered to help by sponsoring the measure. They adopted it in an advertised meeting to much public acclaim but subsequently reversed it without notice, disingenuously subdividing it into an impossible two-stage, if-then measure. Indignant proponents refused support, but it still nearly passed.
- The Port pretends to operate an international shipping terminal. They moor a derelict ship at a derelict pier and pretend it is a newly expanded shipping terminal even though they earlier petitioned congress to abandon the federal waterway, rendering the facility utterly useless. Nevertheless, they have produced new professional marketing brochures and the facility supports good executive jobs - though no one bothers to respond to shipping inquiries.
- The City will provide hundreds of millions of street and utility infrastructure, usually provided by developers, at taxpayer expense to support property sales that will only benefit the Port, and which could harm the City's tax base.
Overall, the public will bear remarkable costs but it is not clear what benefit they will receive. The Port is operating like a private property development company, not a public agency. Gaming the environmental review, falsifying documents, hiding liabilities, subdividing projects, obstructing a citizen initiative, pretending to operate a port, burying details under clouds of reports and dragging tprocess out for over a decade - all suggest a process rife with fraud and deception, and possibly indictable criminal offenses.
It is in the public's best interest to leave no stone unturned in evaluating the hidden details of the Port's unfolding plan and to educate themselves about the true costs. Bellingham will never have a public waterfront or a functional port if the Port succeeds in selling it for upscale development unrelated to port activities. This is potentially a billion dollar boondoggle that only the power of daylight can bring to right.
If 1,000 people - less than 2% of Bellingham's population - donate $___ dollars, citizens could finally have the resources and information to become a force that can no longer be ignored in determining Bellingham's waterfront futures.
Thu, Jan 29, 2015, 9:56 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein Bellingham's billion dollar boondoggle is revisited
1 comments; last on Jan 30, 2015
Sun, Jan 18, 2015, 8:15 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the ridiculous is ridiculed
5 comments; last on Jan 21, 2015
Sun, Nov 23, 2014, 3:27 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein Whatcom's Klan heritage may be oozing from some cracks
8 comments; last on Dec 06, 2014
Sat, Nov 01, 2014, 11:29 am // Tip JohnsonOr why to vote for Nyima, the dog, for County Prosecutor
4 comments; last on Nov 03, 2014
Thu, Oct 23, 2014, 10:01 am // Tip JohnsonIt's just how things roll in Whatcom County
5 comments; last on Oct 26, 2014
Sat, Oct 04, 2014, 11:23 am // Tip JohnsonWherein we see that sometimes government can do what business can't.
9 comments; last on Oct 07, 2014
Tue, Jun 17, 2014, 9:18 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the failings of a bad policy framework are revealed
1 comments; last on Jun 19, 2014
Mon, May 05, 2014, 2:34 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the gyrations of the bid for widespread county slaughter are exposed.
2 comments; last on May 07, 2014
Sat, Mar 15, 2014, 12:11 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein there's a crackdown on growing plants, and plans to let slaughter run free
2 comments; last on Mar 16, 2014
Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 8:23 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the direct, indirect, hidden and lost opportunity costs make this a waterfront boondoggle of billions
3 comments; last on Dec 11, 2013
Thu, Nov 14, 2013, 1:39 am // Tip JohnsonDear Mr. President, There's a sucker born every minute, and two to take him.
7 comments; last on Nov 21, 2013
Mon, Oct 28, 2013, 10:19 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein we discover why we exert our rights - and grab some more petitions before it's too late
3 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013
Sun, Jun 02, 2013, 12:41 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein various comments are compiled and compounded, and citizens encouraged to act
2 comments; last on Jun 11, 2013
Sat, Apr 13, 2013, 8:19 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein we see how the Ds do the work the Rs can't get away with
7 comments; last on Apr 17, 2013
Sat, Apr 13, 2013, 2:47 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the people who call capping a clean-up say toxics safe enough for day care.
1 comments; last on Apr 25, 2013
Mon, Apr 08, 2013, 11:56 am // Tip JohnsonWherein we complain about the City and Port stealing from the public
6 comments; last on Apr 13, 2013
Sun, Mar 24, 2013, 3:01 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the Cattlemen define 'small scale' as an unlimited number of facilities of up to 50 million live pounds per year.
3 comments; last on Mar 26, 2013
Sat, Mar 23, 2013, 10:53 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the rate base gets a soaking while officials keep big-bubble toking
7 comments; last on Apr 08, 2013
Tue, Mar 05, 2013, 3:20 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein it's even worse when the legislation is about sausage
Sat, Mar 02, 2013, 8:03 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the ironies of life are explored and the necessities of life are contemplated
2 comments; last on Mar 12, 2013
Mon, Feb 25, 2013, 5:51 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein artists have to eat, too!
Fri, Feb 15, 2013, 12:20 am // Tip JohnsonWherein the Slaughterhouse Ken and Barbie show present Slaughterville, their new vision for Whatcom County
9 comments; last on Feb 19, 2013
Mon, Dec 03, 2012, 3:26 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein citizens must hold their representatives' feet to the fire
6 comments; last on Dec 09, 2012
Sat, Nov 03, 2012, 1:21 pm // Tip JohnsonAn letter to the County Council on opening the county to the slaughter industry
8 comments; last on Nov 09, 2012
Mon, Oct 08, 2012, 2:53 pm // Tip JohnsonThe Lummi Nation Declares Their Sovereign Objectives at Cherry Point
2 comments; last on Oct 14, 2012
Sun, Jul 15, 2012, 12:54 am // Tip JohnsonWherein we see the Railroad walking it's walk while we get ready to talk our talk.
1 comments; last on Jul 16, 2012
Thu, Jun 07, 2012, 7:37 pm // Tip JohnsonHereby hoping to stimulate discussion of what expanding the Port Commission is meant to achieve, what constitutes good government and how we might best achieve it.
18 comments; last on Jun 14, 2012
Wed, Jun 06, 2012, 9:32 am // Tip JohnsonWherein the port proves they are incompetent to do the public's business
Thu, May 17, 2012, 9:43 am // Tip JohnsonFootage overlooking the Fairhaven area
5 comments; last on Jun 19, 2012
Sun, Apr 22, 2012, 6:28 pm // Tip JohnsonWill donuts prove more important than street trees?
10 comments; last on May 02, 2012
Sun, Apr 08, 2012, 10:33 am // Tip JohnsonWherein the shenanigans start smelling too fishy to tolerate
1 comments; last on Apr 11, 2012
Mon, Jan 09, 2012, 9:27 pm // Tip JohnsonWe have a new mayor!
4 comments; last on Jan 10, 2012
Sun, Dec 04, 2011, 5:53 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the sooty prospect of economic necessity rears its ugly head
2 comments; last on Dec 05, 2011
Sat, Nov 26, 2011, 4:30 pm // Tip JohnsonO.K. Who's in charge of all these ungulates?
14 comments; last on Dec 02, 2011
Fri, Nov 11, 2011, 4:11 pm // Tip JohnsonDaydreams of a recovering politician
2 comments; last on Nov 12, 2011
Thu, Sep 29, 2011, 8:00 pm // Tip JohnsonI think we've got a winner!
3 comments; last on Sep 30, 2011
Sun, Sep 25, 2011, 11:59 pm // Tip JohnsonEeny, meeny, miny, moe
15 comments; last on Sep 29, 2011
Sun, Sep 18, 2011, 5:16 pm // Tip JohnsonSpoiler Alert: If you are enjoying your blackberries this year, read no further
2 comments; last on Sep 19, 2011
Wed, Sep 14, 2011, 12:38 am // Tip JohnsonA bad deal, but good enough - for now
1 comments; last on Sep 15, 2011
Mon, Sep 12, 2011, 1:44 pm // Tip JohnsonLegislation and Sausage: Very hard to watch being made.
2 comments; last on Sep 13, 2011
Sun, Sep 11, 2011, 9:36 pm // Tip JohnsonRepublished from Whatcom Watch - Let's Save Vendovi Island!
2 comments; last on Sep 15, 2011
Mon, Aug 15, 2011, 10:49 pm // Tip JohnsonShould we accept or dig into Chuckanut Ridge?
21 comments; last on Aug 30, 2011
Mon, Jun 20, 2011, 10:42 am // Tip JohnsonWherein something smells a bit fishy
2 comments; last on Jul 29, 2011
Mon, May 30, 2011, 10:40 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein blackened hearts and minds are initially examined
6 comments; last on Jun 02, 2011
Thu, Mar 03, 2011, 1:16 am // Tip JohnsonOr, The Village That Once Was. Or, I Didn't have Time to Write Something Short, Again.
7 comments; last on Apr 24, 2011
Thu, Feb 24, 2011, 2:09 am // Tip JohnsonYou've gotta be kidding!
13 comments; last on Mar 01, 2011
Fri, Nov 26, 2010, 1:09 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein surrender may be the key to success
5 comments; last on Dec 11, 2010
Thu, Aug 26, 2010, 3:01 pm // Tip JohnsonLegal or Political Football?
4 comments; last on Aug 27, 2010
Fri, Aug 20, 2010, 4:26 pm // Tip JohnsonIslanders need a new game
1 comments; last on Aug 24, 2010
Wed, Aug 18, 2010, 5:07 pm // Tip JohnsonIgnoring the real problem
3 comments; last on Aug 19, 2010
Sat, Aug 14, 2010, 1:20 pm // Tip JohnsonTime for hardball?
Thu, Aug 05, 2010, 2:50 pm // Tip JohnsonWhere, oh where, are our federal representatives?
6 comments; last on Aug 06, 2010
Mon, Jul 19, 2010, 12:53 pm // Tip JohnsonFor-Profit Non-Profits - Pulling the Plug on Services
Mon, Jul 19, 2010, 12:20 pm // Tip JohnsonTaxation without representation
4 comments; last on Apr 16, 2011
Mon, Jun 21, 2010, 5:40 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the absurdity of the Lummi Blockade is explored in yet more excrutiating detail
1 comments; last on Jun 22, 2010
Tue, Jun 08, 2010, 10:31 pm // Tip JohnsonI mean, come on!
3 comments; last on Jun 09, 2010
Tue, Jun 01, 2010, 8:33 am // Tip JohnsonOil Addiction: All Day Every Day
Sun, May 02, 2010, 5:31 pm // Tip JohnsonMore problems with secret government
1 comments; last on May 03, 2010
Sat, May 01, 2010, 8:53 pm // Tip JohnsonIn which the perils of a police state are only barely considered
2 comments; last on May 04, 2010
Fri, Feb 05, 2010, 1:23 am // Tip JohnsonLummi officials and Lummi Island residents meet -Village to Village
2 comments; last on Feb 07, 2010
Election InfoCounty election results
State election results
Coal, Oil & Trains
Community Wise Bellingham
Powder River Basin R. C.
Local Blogs & NewsBellingham Herald
Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
League of Women Voters
Western Front - WWU
Local CausesChuckanut Community Forest
City Club of Bellingham
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice
Port of Bellingham
State election results
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Weather & ClimateCliff Mass Weather Blog
Nat Hurricane Center
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Edge of Sports
Famous Internet Skiers
Good Web SitesAl-Jazeera online
Foreign Policy in Focus
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Middle East Times
New American Century
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Project Vote Smart
Stand for the Troops
Talking Points Memo
The Crisis Papers
War and Piece
NwCitizen 1995 - 2007Early Northwest Citizen
Quiet, Offline or DeadBellingham Police Activity
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph