Mobile SlaughterPermalink +
Sat, Mar 15, 2014, 12:11 pm // Tip Johnson
The Whatcom County Council is doing for pot what they should have done for slaughter. Amazingly, they have the juice to minutely regulate the growing of plants, but insisted on a laissez faire approach to slaughterhouses.
Under new rules contemplated by the County Council, a marijuana business will have to be at least 300 feet from an existing home. The council recently adopted rules allowing slaughterhouses as close as 150 feet from existing residences. In areas with eight or more residences, marijuana businesses will have to be at least 1,000 feet away. The setback for slaughterhouses remains 150 feet regardless of the number of homes. Marijuana businesses will have to be at least 1,000 feet from community centers, religious institutions, schools and daycares. Slaughterhouses can be 500 feet from a school, but the rules are silent on the distance from other facilities where people or youth congregate.
This may be as rational as zoning gets north of the Chuckanuts, whether due to parochial isolation or the waterfront's missing 500 tons of mercury no one will talk about. We may never know, but it seems that our county's legislative body can distinguish between more or less suitable areas for a given activity or use. That's a good sign, but one we didn't see when they forced through a blanket industrial upzone allowing an unlimited number of slaughterhouses anywhere on 88,000 acres of agricultural land.
Now, setbacks and environmental concerns are out the window. The slaughter of poultry will soon occur any place you can park a truck, whether there are homes, schools, churches or day-cares.
Continuing to prove that the Herald is about a good story rather than information, Ralph Schwartz published a piece about mobile chicken slaughter based on a March 3rd press release from Sera Hartman at the Northwest Agriculture Business Center.
The release promotes the coming arrival of a mobile slaughter facility this spring and offers, "Pastured poultry has long been recognized as a viable enterprise for diversified family farms…With the closing of the last remaining northwest Washington custom processor in October last year, local poultry businesses not already possessing their own processing facility are faced with either building a licensed facility and obtaining costly product liability insurance, or shutting down operations altogether."
Ralph, bless his soul, wrote me to ask, "Based on your research on the environmental impacts of slaughter facilities, what can you say about these mobile units? To your knowledge, do they pose a environmental/health problem or do they handle waste water, offal, etc. safely?"
In a classic pullout approach, Ralph quotes me thus: ""It all has potential to go in the water, and these are the limits we don't have a handle on," Johnson wrote in an email to The Bellingham Herald."
The article does address a real need producers have for facilities, and underscores the growing demand consumers are expressing for better product. What is left out is any realistic discussion of the environmental consequences and whether a mobile work-around is better than the community working together to put the appropriate facilities in the best possible place. Mobile slaughter will dispose of blood and offal on and in the ground. It will encourage greater animal production which will increase nitrogen and phosphorus loads on pasture lands. With a mobile unit, who will know whether these wastes are disposed in critical areas, wetlands, near wellheads or on aquifer recharge areas? Will there be a threshold for loading, as we have established for the municipal watershed?
A mobile facility will help farmers continue raising poultry and that's good for them. But a mobile facility will make answering environmental questions and controlling impacts more difficult than at a stationary facility. Eventually, the county may need to consider slaughter, whether mobile or not, with the same energy they have found for marijuana, in order to protect our water quality and the public health.
Here are my complete remarks to Ralph:
Mobile units are an economically rational solution to a lack of slaughter facilities. They can be operated safely but are not without their problems. North Cascades Meat Cooperative intends to employ such a facility, but possibly leave it in a single location. That could be problematic. We need to ask how much the land can absorb. Eventually, mobile units may prove uneconomical.
According to the Northwest Agricultural Business Center, "Each farm must provide on-farm composting for offal…potable water, a receiving area for waste water (a suitable pasture or other well drained area that will not pollute a water supply or stream)…"
"At this time it is estimated that a producer with 150 birds to process per batch including, for this example, 90 miles round trip travel, cutting-up, packaging and custom labeling all product will be paying approx. $3.60 per bird. Clearly fewer birds would cost incrementally more and a greater number of birds would cost less per processed package."
A report by the Economic Research Service of the USDA entitled "Slaughter and Processing Options and Issues for Locally Sourced Meat" admits that "biosecurity issues may also pose a risk" with mobile units, and concludes that "Although MSUs may provide an opportunity for producers marketing locally sourced meat products, their small scale can also compromise the cost-effectiveness of the slaughter process, since more inputs are required per animal relative to larger fixed slaughter plants. Given the current slaughter capacity and the number of units in operation now, the extent to which MSUs can facilitate growth in local markets may be marginal in the short term."
This underscores the essential problem with the industry. It is marginal at every turn. Economic forces drive producers to maximize production and provide ample incentive for cutting costs at every opportunity. This can lead to over application of manure wastes, improper composting of offal, improper disposal of regulated wastes, bad reporting and the like. This is a matter of record with Whatcom County's only USDA facility.
A crucial issue is how much nitrogen, phosphorus and offal can we put in or on the land without damaging ground or surface water quality. For Lake Whatcom we have completed a TMDL study to benchmark the loads we impose on the environment. Our rainy climate produces abundant waterways. These also have limits that we have not scientifically explored. Exceeding them will affect water quality, animal health, habitat, endangered species, etc.
According to Pew Research, each 100 birds will produce 8 cubic feet of manure per year. That's over 1,600 cubic feet of nitrogen and phosphate rich waste per year for each producer generating their exempt limit, and doesn't include offal or feathers. Feathers are notoriously difficult to compost. One disadvantage of mobile units is that they are not generally equipped to consolidate these wastes and get them to a rendering plant. Waste streams produce some revenue in larger facilities. Users of mobile units will not benefit from these offsets.
In an article entitled "An egg industry perspective" (Poultry Digest, Jan. 1990), D. Bell observes, "The amount of animal wastes produced in the U.S. is staggering. In chickens, for example, the daily production of wastes is essentially equal to the amount of feed used. This means for every truckload of feed that is brought onto the farm, a similar load of waste must be removed." Alternatively, it may instead be left in the pasture by the birds or applied to land as fertilizer. Over application of manure fertilizer has already polluted many aquifers in Whatcom County with too many nitrates. The pollution problem extends beyond manure and offal to antibiotics, heavy metals, chemicals and concern over GMO feedstocks. There are also pathogenic vectors of concern, including diseases, bacteria, parasites, pathogen cysts, and viruses.
In "Animal Waste Pollution in America: An Emerging National Problem", a staff report prepared for Senator Tom Harken and the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture in December of 1997, "Poisoned well water is a major problem on..the Eastern Shore of Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia, which slaughters over 600 million chickens a year, resulting in an annual 3.2 billion pounds of raw waste, 13.8 million pounds of phosphorous, and 48.2 million pounds of nitrogen."
We may not slaughter near that many chickens, and raising pastured poultry certainly seems nicer than factory farms, but we can't escape that in pastured stocks, manure is going on the ground. With mobile units, blood is going on the ground and offal in the ground. Presumably, waste from the chicken houses will go on crops or for compost. It all has potential to go in the water and these are the limits we don't have a handle on. Ironically, there is a better chance of stricter control in a factory setting.
But there's the rub. Consumers want better and safer product than the factories are able to produce. They want not only better product, but a more conscious methodology. That was a key piece missing from the slaughter ordinance last year: Adopting the highest quality standards for feeding, husbanding and processing the animals not only assures quality product, it is critical to limiting environmental damage. Generally, we do not have and cannot supply sufficient staff to adequately monitor many dispersed operations.
Slaughter was the originating cause of land use regulation. No sooner had government understood that slaughter must move "outside the walls" of the city, then it also realized it must also not be too remote for frequent inspection.
In the end, we would likely be better off taking a public health approach, forming a consortium of producers, buyers. sellers, consumers and operators, adopting high quality standards, assessing local need, finding the best location and planning an adequate facility. Low-interest, tax-free, federally-guaranteed industrial development bonds could help defray the enormous start-up costs. Simply connecting such a facility to publicly owned water supply and wastewater treatment would solve at least 80% of the potential problems.
Related Links:-> Ralph's puff piece
-> About the Mobile Slaughter Unit
Sat, Mar 15, 2014, 12:11 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein there's a crackdown on growing plants, and plans to let slaughter run free
2 comments; last on Mar 16, 2014
Sat, Dec 07, 2013, 8:23 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the direct, indirect, hidden and lost opportunity costs make this a waterfront boondoggle of billions
3 comments; last on Dec 11, 2013
Paper Dreams in Fairhaven
Thu, Nov 14, 2013, 1:39 am // Tip JohnsonDear Mr. President, There's a sucker born every minute, and two to take him.
7 comments; last on Nov 21, 2013
Mon, Oct 28, 2013, 10:19 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein we discover why we exert our rights - and grab some more petitions before it's too late
3 comments; last on Nov 06, 2013
Sun, Jun 02, 2013, 12:41 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein various comments are compiled and compounded, and citizens encouraged to act
2 comments; last on Jun 11, 2013
Sat, Apr 13, 2013, 8:19 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein we see how the Ds do the work the Rs can't get away with
7 comments; last on Apr 17, 2013
Sat, Apr 13, 2013, 2:47 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the people who call capping a clean-up say toxics safe enough for day care.
1 comments; last on Apr 25, 2013
Mon, Apr 08, 2013, 11:56 am // Tip JohnsonWherein we complain about the City and Port stealing from the public
6 comments; last on Apr 13, 2013
Sun, Mar 24, 2013, 3:01 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the Cattlemen define 'small scale' as an unlimited number of facilities of up to 50 million live pounds per year.
3 comments; last on Mar 26, 2013
Sat, Mar 23, 2013, 10:53 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the rate base gets a soaking while officials keep big-bubble toking
7 comments; last on Apr 08, 2013
Tue, Mar 05, 2013, 3:20 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein it's even worse when the legislation is about sausage
Sat, Mar 02, 2013, 8:03 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the ironies of life are explored and the necessities of life are contemplated
2 comments; last on Mar 12, 2013
Mon, Feb 25, 2013, 5:51 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein artists have to eat, too!
Fri, Feb 15, 2013, 12:20 am // Tip JohnsonWherein the Slaughterhouse Ken and Barbie show present Slaughterville, their new vision for Whatcom County
9 comments; last on Feb 19, 2013
Mon, Dec 03, 2012, 3:26 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein citizens must hold their representatives' feet to the fire
6 comments; last on Dec 09, 2012
Sat, Nov 03, 2012, 1:21 pm // Tip JohnsonAn letter to the County Council on opening the county to the slaughter industry
8 comments; last on Nov 08, 2012
Mon, Oct 08, 2012, 2:53 pm // Tip JohnsonThe Lummi Nation Declares Their Sovereign Objectives at Cherry Point
2 comments; last on Oct 14, 2012
Sun, Jul 15, 2012, 12:54 am // Tip JohnsonWherein we see the Railroad walking it's walk while we get ready to talk our talk.
1 comments; last on Jul 16, 2012
Thu, Jun 07, 2012, 7:37 pm // Tip JohnsonHereby hoping to stimulate discussion of what expanding the Port Commission is meant to achieve, what constitutes good government and how we might best achieve it.
18 comments; last on Jun 14, 2012
Wed, Jun 06, 2012, 9:32 am // Tip JohnsonWherein the port proves they are incompetent to do the public's business
Thu, May 17, 2012, 9:43 am // Tip JohnsonFootage overlooking the Fairhaven area
5 comments; last on Jun 19, 2012
Sun, Apr 22, 2012, 6:28 pm // Tip JohnsonWill donuts prove more important than street trees?
10 comments; last on May 02, 2012
Sun, Apr 08, 2012, 10:33 am // Tip JohnsonWherein the shenanigans start smelling too fishy to tolerate
1 comments; last on Apr 11, 2012
Mon, Jan 09, 2012, 9:27 pm // Tip JohnsonWe have a new mayor!
4 comments; last on Jan 10, 2012
Sun, Dec 04, 2011, 5:53 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the sooty prospect of economic necessity rears its ugly head
2 comments; last on Dec 05, 2011
Sat, Nov 26, 2011, 4:30 pm // Tip JohnsonO.K. Who's in charge of all these ungulates?
14 comments; last on Dec 02, 2011
Fri, Nov 11, 2011, 4:11 pm // Tip JohnsonDaydreams of a recovering politician
2 comments; last on Nov 12, 2011
Thu, Sep 29, 2011, 8:00 pm // Tip JohnsonI think we've got a winner!
3 comments; last on Sep 30, 2011
Sun, Sep 25, 2011, 11:59 pm // Tip JohnsonEeny, meeny, miny, moe
15 comments; last on Sep 29, 2011
Sun, Sep 18, 2011, 5:16 pm // Tip JohnsonSpoiler Alert: If you are enjoying your blackberries this year, read no further
2 comments; last on Sep 19, 2011
Wed, Sep 14, 2011, 12:38 am // Tip JohnsonA bad deal, but good enough - for now
1 comments; last on Sep 15, 2011
Mon, Sep 12, 2011, 1:44 pm // Tip JohnsonLegislation and Sausage: Very hard to watch being made.
2 comments; last on Sep 13, 2011
Sun, Sep 11, 2011, 9:36 pm // Tip JohnsonRepublished from Whatcom Watch - Let's Save Vendovi Island!
2 comments; last on Sep 15, 2011
Mon, Aug 15, 2011, 10:49 pm // Tip JohnsonShould we accept or dig into Chuckanut Ridge?
21 comments; last on Aug 30, 2011
Mon, Jun 20, 2011, 10:42 am // Tip JohnsonWherein something smells a bit fishy
2 comments; last on Jul 29, 2011
Mon, May 30, 2011, 10:40 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein blackened hearts and minds are initially examined
6 comments; last on Jun 02, 2011
Thu, Mar 03, 2011, 1:16 am // Tip JohnsonOr, The Village That Once Was. Or, I Didn't have Time to Write Something Short, Again.
7 comments; last on Apr 24, 2011
Thu, Feb 24, 2011, 2:09 am // Tip JohnsonYou've gotta be kidding!
13 comments; last on Mar 01, 2011
Fri, Nov 26, 2010, 1:09 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein surrender may be the key to success
5 comments; last on Dec 11, 2010
Thu, Aug 26, 2010, 3:01 pm // Tip JohnsonLegal or Political Football?
4 comments; last on Aug 27, 2010
Fri, Aug 20, 2010, 4:26 pm // Tip JohnsonIslanders need a new game
1 comments; last on Aug 24, 2010
Wed, Aug 18, 2010, 5:07 pm // Tip JohnsonIgnoring the real problem
3 comments; last on Aug 19, 2010
Sat, Aug 14, 2010, 1:20 pm // Tip JohnsonTime for hardball?
Thu, Aug 05, 2010, 2:50 pm // Tip JohnsonWhere, oh where, are our federal representatives?
6 comments; last on Aug 06, 2010
Mon, Jul 19, 2010, 12:53 pm // Tip JohnsonFor-Profit Non-Profits - Pulling the Plug on Services
Mon, Jul 19, 2010, 12:20 pm // Tip JohnsonTaxation without representation
4 comments; last on Apr 16, 2011
Mon, Jun 21, 2010, 5:40 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein the absurdity of the Lummi Blockade is explored in yet more excrutiating detail
1 comments; last on Jun 22, 2010
Tue, Jun 08, 2010, 10:31 pm // Tip JohnsonI mean, come on!
3 comments; last on Jun 09, 2010
Tue, Jun 01, 2010, 8:33 am // Tip JohnsonOil Addiction: All Day Every Day
Sun, May 02, 2010, 5:31 pm // Tip JohnsonMore problems with secret government
1 comments; last on May 03, 2010
Sat, May 01, 2010, 8:53 pm // Tip JohnsonIn which the perils of a police state are only barely considered
2 comments; last on May 04, 2010
Fri, Feb 05, 2010, 1:23 am // Tip JohnsonLummi officials and Lummi Island residents meet -Village to Village
2 comments; last on Feb 07, 2010
Wed, Feb 03, 2010, 2:31 pm // Tip JohnsonWhatcom County lacks both authority and leverage to negotiate a Lummi Island ferry deal
Sat, Jan 23, 2010, 7:15 pm // Tip JohnsonThe Lummi Nation appears prepared to implement a threatened blockade of Lummi Island commencing February 14th
1 comments; last on Jan 24, 2010
Tue, Jan 05, 2010, 12:17 am // Tip JohnsonPort of Bellingham in the news
Thu, Dec 31, 2009, 6:15 pm // Tip JohnsonTip writes a letter to President Obama about Health Care and about his concerns that Obama has sold us short.
8 comments; last on Jan 04, 2010
Mon, Dec 21, 2009, 2:59 pm // Tip JohnsonIt looks like we've got a pretty watered down climate accord. It doesn't provide accountability and won't limit warming to within the two degree Celsius out-of-control climate tipping…
9 comments; last on Dec 23, 2009
Sat, Dec 05, 2009, 8:00 am // Tip JohnsonI always hate public issues that involve decades of history and require integration of multiple points. I refer to it as 'the indignity of explanation.' Public interest advocates…
9 comments; last on Dec 09, 2009
Wed, Nov 25, 2009, 12:25 pm // Tip Johnson
Paul de Armond's recent article about Leonard Zeskind's new book, "Blood and Poli
3 comments; last on Nov 29, 2009
Sat, Nov 14, 2009, 11:19 am // Tip JohnsonWe don't make special offers like this very often, but if you act right now, you'll not only continue getting free access to fresh views, news and opinion…
14 comments; last on Nov 18, 2009
New LinksJulia Ioffe/New Republic
Current InterestCommunity Wise Bellingham
Friends of Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
League of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Local Blogs & NewsBellingham Herald
Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
League of Women Voters
Western Front - WWU
Local CausesBellingham Police Activity
Chuckanut Community Forest
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
WA Conservation Voters
Port of Bellingham
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Weather & ClimateCliff Mass Weather Blog
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Edge of Sports
Famous Internet Skiers
Good LinksAl-Jazeera online
Foreign Policy in Focus
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Middle East Times
New American Century
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Project Vote Smart
Talking Points Memo
War and Piece
NwCitizen 1995 - 2007Early Northwest Citizen
Internet At Its BestTED
Quiet, Offline or DeadBellingham Register
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers