If you enjoy the content you find here, please consider donating to support our continued efforts to bring you the best news and opinion articles we can. We hope you like the recent update to NWCitizen, and look forward to bringing you more insight into local politics and issues in 2017.

Support NWCitizen Not Now

A note from the publisher

By On

If you live in the selected area of south Bellingham where the new park district will be formed, then you received your ballot in the mail this past week. If you did not receive a ballot already then you are not in the proposed park district. Also, if you are in the park district and the proposal passes, you will be taxed even if you vote no. This has been a question from some.

I urge you to scan the comments as well as the articles. Some comments are from very knowledgeable people who provide perspective and facts that are sometimes more valuable than the article they are commenting under. At some point, we will hopefully each learn enough to make a decision and fill out our ballot. This site is trying to provide you with enough opinions so you can easily pick and choose what you want to read.

I particularly want to thank commenters for providing us with their views. Some have either never commented here before or have rarely done so. NWCitizen requires every person to use their real name and we verify every person's identity before enabling them to comment. There are now over 200 verified commenters. Not allowing anonymous comments leads to far fewer comments, but a higher level of dialogue. The whole point of this website is to help us learn of public processes and have a community discussion of issues.

Over the past week, there have been the highest levels of readers checking this website in the 17 years it has existed. As I write this Saturday noon, almost 3,000 have checked it since midnight, and 18,000 visits were made in the past 7 days - of course many making multiple visits. It kicks me back to realizing my role is to try and present a fair forum.

I will continue to post articles and comments on this issue right up to Feb 12. If you want to delay voting and learn more, this park district discussion will continue for another 10 days.

About John Servais

Writer • Fairhaven, Washington USA • Member since Feb 26, 2008

John started Northwest Citizen in 1995 to inform fellow citizens of serious local political issues that the Bellingham Herald was ignoring. With the help of donors from the beginning, he has [...]

Comments by Readers

Dan Pike

Feb 02, 2013

John,

While we disagree on many issues—and agree on many others—I really appreciate your providing this forum, and moderating it fairly.  There are too few places where a give-and-take of ideas can occur in our community, yet that is necessary for better informed decision-making. NW Citizen provide a key role in filling that need ofr productive dialog.

Thanks.

Read More...

Christopher Grannis

Feb 02, 2013

John,
The essence of democracy is that the better informed the citizens are, the better the choices they will make with their votes. Thank you for providing this forum and for the way you manage it.

Read More...

Jack Petree

Feb 03, 2013

Impressive readership numbers and you do address important topics.  Any chance the Indy will ever get going again?

Read More...

Delaine Clizbe

Feb 03, 2013

John,
Thanks for posting!  I really had not spent time reading your blog before this MPD issue.  Looking over past posts I see that for the most part you do present a variety of information and I will continue to read this blog for important information.  If you could please contact me at my email delaine918@gmail.com   I would eventually like to post an article about another topic.

Read More...

Alex McLean

Feb 03, 2013

I disagree with Mr. Servais’ prior contention that Greenways is a secretive institution. I further disagree with Mr. Servais’ general animosity toward committees and commissions in this town—yes, there are too many and, yes, they can clutter and gum up the works occasionally; I still see having citizen volunteers as watchdogs over our tax dollars as an overall good thing. I probably don’t like the same flavor of ice-cream that Mr. Servais’ does. I hear he is a “cat person,” but dogs clearly are better.

Ultimately, however, I’m really glad to have (re) discovered this forum that Mr. Servais’ provides for our community. It takes a lot of work massaging blogs into shape and, unlike this MPD ballot measure, he has so far failed to try to dip into my wallet to support his pet cause.

Thanks, John, for gutting it out all these years.
(Dogs Rule!)

Read More...

Frank James

Feb 03, 2013

John

I wish I could be as positive as other commenters. There is an obvious interest that you have in creating as much controversy as possible as your above readership numbers demonstrates.

It is very unfortunate that you headline an article with

“Nicholas Zaferatos explains why he is against the park district “

When in the first paragraph of the article Mr Zaferatos says

“For the record, I have not come out publicly opposing the measure.”

Seems like your personal interest and you editorial bias are showing more than a little.

Frank

Read More...

David Marshak

Feb 03, 2013

The Greenway Advisory Committee’s Strategic Plan is here:

http://www.cob.org/documents/mayor/boards-commissions/greenway/greenway-strategic-plan.pdf

While this document was published toward the end of 2011, it is still largely accurate.

The plan is a public document. There are no secrets in it.

Read More...

John Servais

Feb 03, 2013

Frank, fair enough.  I had missed that sentence - or failed to note how my lead was not justified.  And the lead is now changed, dropping “against” and in its place using “concerned”.  Thanks.

Read More...

Riley Sweeney

Feb 04, 2013

I just wanted to echo what everyone else said. There is literally no other place of this caliber for discussing local news. When I’m writing for my blog, I often say to myself, “Is this high enough quality for NWCitizen?” if not, I often scratch it or re-write it. Thank you John for all the hard work you do keeping this ship afloat.

Read More...

Dudley Evenson

Feb 05, 2013

John, I remember you said you were opposed to saving this forest but when you saw the videos we made, you changed your mind and understood what an important ecological treasure this Chuckanut Community Forest is.  Here are the video links of the short excerpts of the video to remind you and also to let your readers get some more historical background on the forest that so many in our community have worked tirelessly for over 20 years to save.  Thank you.
To view all parts of the Chuckanut Community Forest Video click these links:
Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTe7EjQw0J0
Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhZSuLQYCro
Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlbJHcWDiuc
Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E43thMZngXI

Read More...

John Servais

Feb 05, 2013

Dudley,  I never said such.  Perhaps I said it did not all need to be saved. And we have not spoken in a long long time - years?  Please do not put words in my mouth that end up with a he says she says. 

Thanks for the links to your videos.  The videos focus on the wetlands and those are securely saved and will never be built on and not part of this Park District issue.  To use the wetlands as a motivator to vote for the Park District is misleading.

Read More...
Facebook Google LinkedIn Print Reddit Twitter