Mayor Linville Raids City Budget Funds To Subsidize Private Development
Permalink +Mon, Jun 17, 2013, 6:00 am // Wendy Harris
The City Council is meeting today and and after reviewing the agenda, I am dismayed to see the city administration’s attempt to create a new funding source for an expensive project, off-site wetland mitigation and stormwater management, by appropriating funds (1.5 million) from projects that were previously budgeted. The total costs will exceed $1,850,000. (Agenda Bill 20010 in the Council Public Works Committee
The public had an expectation of where public funds would be spent, as reflected in the city’s 2013 city budget. Transferring funds from one account to another to support new projects, after the 2013 budget has been approved, is an action that lacks public transparency. No one polices the city budget and provides public accountability when these things occur.
The funds will be used to purchase 13 acres for a regional stormwater facility, and 20 acres for “future wetland mitigation.” The city does not currently manage an off-site mitigation program, which would require amendment of the Critical Area Ordinance and a public hearing. It is disrespectful to the public to fund projects that have not been vetted through the public process and approved by the Council. I ask the Council not to be complicit in these types of actions anymore, particularly because they are becoming a hallmark of the Linville administration.
The Agenda Bill is misleading to the public. It notes the wetland mitigation project on the front page, and thereafter, drops the subject entirely to discuss the stormwater project, which is considerably less controversial.
The stated justification for the fund transfers is that “the City of Bellingham recognizes the importance of job creation and job retention.” Yet, that is completely irrelevant to creation of an off-site wetland mitigation project. Under Bellingham Code, off-site mitigation is authorized only if it is demonstrated to increase ecological function per project being mitigated. BMC 16.55.350.
Site selection for compensatory mitigation shall be based on a location that will provide the greatest ecological benefit and have the greatest likelihood of success. Where feasible, mitigation shall occur in the same subbasin as the permitted wetland alteration. However, if it can be demonstrated that a mitigation site in an alternative subbasin or watershed would provide a greater ecological benefit and offer a more successful replacement of wetland functions and values, compensatory mitigation can take place in an alternative subbasin or watershed.
It is a misuse of public funds to create a city sponsored off-site mitigation plan for the purpose of creating jobs. The administrative needs to be forthcoming about this, and it is not.
The Agenda Bill fails to disclose how the off-site mitigation program will work, such that it will result in increased ecological function, or, if in the alternative, the administration will be attempting to reduce existing levels of protection in the Critical Area Ordinance. Nor does the Agenda Bill disclose the most important fact of all….wetland mitigation is a documented failure. The practical reason to pursue this program is to permit more development and infill, not to protect natural resources.
Moreover, I question the use of $2 million dollars of public funds to essentially subsidize private development. The goal of these projects is to reduce the costs of mitigation for private developers. The City lacks adequate funding for important government services, and should be addressing this gap rather than attempting to subsidize private industry. Let the private sector be responsible for job growth and the public sector be responsible for enforcement and the provision of social services.
We need to stop this trend of funding, and amending into city comprehensive planning documents, projects that have not yet been approved. It may be legal, but it is still an unethical usurpation of power by the Executive Branch. Off-site wetland mitigation, in particular, is an important, controversial topic that requires a much wider community discussion before any actions are taken.
Comments (1)
To add a comment, click here to login or register.
John Servais // Mon, Jun 17, 2013, 10:44 am
Wendy, thanks for calling attention to this issue. As few know, this trashing of the city budget during the calendar year is a nasty habit of our mayors and councils. By drawing our attention to this larger than normal transfer, perhaps you can shine some light on the continued practice for smaller items. It has been under the radar for years.
All the conditions for this supposed “need” existed last fall when the budget was approved.
For me, there are just two major requests of candidates and elected officials - and rarely are they met. One is for openness and transparency. The second is for accountability. Then we citizens can sort out the competent from the incompetent and those with agendas that do not match what we the public want.
This funds transfer goes totally against accountability and transparency. Mislabeling and a process that is quietly practiced without the public being informed. A legal notice in legalese language does not make for informing the public.
Lets see who - if anyone - of our seven council members and the mayor explains this to us. Lets see who on the council questions this at the meeting this evening and votes to delay it until the public learns more and can comment. By explaining, I mean in writing with a full press release and a full explanation with facts - that we can all read and become informed about. And then have time to comment on.
Mayor Linville Raids City Budget Funds To Subsidize Private Development
Mon, Jun 17, 2013, 6:00 am // Wendy Harris
In what is becoming a hallmark of the Linville administration, the mayor is seeking funding for an off-site wetland mitigation program that has not yet been approved.1 comments; last on Jun 17, 2013
NWCitizen Stands With Edward Snowden
Mon, Jun 10, 2013, 1:53 pm // John Servais
Edward Snowden is a very courageous patriot, in the opinion of the publisher of NWCitizen.3 comments; last on Jun 14, 2013
Johns Repair
Intersection Art Comes to Happy Valley
Sun, Jun 09, 2013, 10:37 pm // John Servais
Intersection art - the painting of a design on the actual streets - is being developed in the Happy Valley neighborhood.
1 comments; last on Jun 15, 2013
Riley On An Astounding Practice by the Herald
Sat, Jun 08, 2013, 4:21 pm // John Servais
Over at the Political Junkie, Riley Sweeney has a report on one criteria the Herald uses to reject letters to the editor.1 comments; last on Jun 10, 2013
Bellingham Passes Fireworks Ban
Mon, Jun 03, 2013, 10:05 pm // John Servais
City Council passes long-debated ban 4 to 3. It is effective in 2014.0 comments
As Goes Slaughter, So Goes Coal
Sun, Jun 02, 2013, 1:41 pm // Tip Johnson
Wherein various comments are compiled and compounded, and citizens encouraged to act
2 comments; last on Jun 11, 2013
New Links
the OatmealCurrent Interest
Community Wise BellinghamFriends of Whatcom
Guardian Unlimited
Lummi Island Quarry
Reconveyance Challenge
Whatcom Elections
Publisher Recommended
GlobalPostGuardian Unlimited
League of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Sweeney Politics
Local Blogs & News
Bellingham HeraldBham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch
Local Causes
Bellingham Police ActivityChuckanut Community Forest
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Jail - local mega plans
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reconveyance Challenge
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters
Governments
BellinghamPort of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Whatcom Elections
Weather & Climate
Cliff Mass Weather BlogClimate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Leisure
Adventures NWEdge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy
Good Links
Al-Jazeera onlineAlaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com
NwCitizen 1995 - 2007
Early Northwest CitizenInternet At Its Best
TEDQuiet, Offline or Dead
Bellingham RegisterCarl Weimer
David Hackworth
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers