From a Political Junkie: Abstaining from Abstinence-OnlyPermalink +
Mon, Nov 29, 2010, 6:16 am // Riley Sweeney
When it comes to most things, I am a facts-oriented guy. I believe evolution is scientific fact because it has been tested and verified. I believe if you leave milk out it spoils, and an acoustic guitar goes out of tune much faster in cold weather. I believe the more money you spend on a political campaign the more votes you get, and that the price of gas will continue to go up regardless of just about anything. These are things that can be checked, quantified and measured. In short, they are beliefs that can be tested and found to be true.
I also believe in many things that cannot be quantified. I believe in God, in the power of love, in the simple perfection of nature and the transformative power of storytelling. I believe Led Zeppelin is one of the best bands ever, that Brandi Carlile is underrated, and that Nathan Fillion, Christina Hendricks and Sam Rockwell are all going to be huge celebrities in the next five to ten years. I believe Lyndon Baines Johnson was involved in the JFK assassination, that there is no global conspiracy to control everyone, and fluoride in the water creeps me out but I can’t tell you why. In short, they are beliefs I have that I cannot back up with hard facts, they cannot be verified and proved to be true or false.
When it comes to government policy, we should always be pulling from the top category. Basing our community problem solving on feelings and unverified beliefs is not only foolish but shortsighted. We need realistic, results-based policy making. The kind that Wonks can verify and Hacks can espouse. Which brings me to my main point: abstinence-only education.
I went to public school in Olympia. Throughout my middle and high school education, I received abstinence-only education the entire time. There was very little discussion of condoms, and if they were discussed, it was only to talk about how ineffective they were and how often they fail. The pill, the diaphragm, various other methods were barely even mentioned. Just tons of scare tactics. Our classes were filled with lots of discussion about the various sexually transmitted diseases, the potential for pregnancy and why you should not have sex.
Speaking with my peers, I found it was pretty common in Washington state to get that sort of education. A few had better teachers; most had the same routine as I. All of us got our sex ed before Christine Gregoire mandated comprehensive sex education for all Washington public schools.
This goes back to beliefs and facts. It is a fact comprehensive sex education reduces teen pregnancies. Period. Here is a news article from earlier this year talking about California. Yet we continue to throw millions and millions of dollars away on the belief that if you tell a teenager not to do something, they won’t do it. Yeah, it sounds just as ridiculous even in principle.
I could make the financial argument that giving people the ability to decide when they have kids saves the state money in the long run, especially when you consider the aid we give to families unable to get by. But I think that detracts from the simple point that abstinance-only education simply doesn't work.
The fact is, two-thirds of all American teens will have had sex by the time they graduate high school. I know it is better to prepare them with good, medically accurate information. Just telling them "no" is not enough. We need to give them all the tools they need to make good decisions. When you look at it, it comes down to trust.
One of my favorite metaphors is gun safety. If you knew your children were going to have access to guns throughout their life, would you tell them, “No, don’t touch!” over and over again? Or, when they could understand, would you explain to them what guns are, how to safely handle them, and what the proper use is, trusting they will deal with it when they are ready?
I believe no one should be sexually active until they are ready. That is my belief, but I also know the facts on sex education. We need to push for comprehensive sex education nation-wide. Every year, the Republicans at various levels of government team up with conservative Dems to throw more money down the drain by mandating abstinence-only education. It's time we just said "no" to that.
Mon, Nov 29, 2010, 6:16 am // Riley SweeneyRiley Sweeney examines facts vs beliefs and comprehensive sex education
4 comments; last on Dec 01, 2010
Sat, Nov 27, 2010, 8:19 pm // John ServaisTSA puts young mother with a bag of breast milk through an illegal and unbelievable process.
5 comments; last on Nov 29, 2010
Fri, Nov 26, 2010, 2:09 pm // Tip JohnsonWherein surrender may be the key to success
5 comments; last on Dec 11, 2010
Wed, Nov 24, 2010, 5:00 am // Paul deArmondWhile Democrats pursue a Centrist strategy trying to persuade the “marginal voter,” Republicans promote wedge issues under the rubric of the “Big Tent.”
14 comments; last on Dec 01, 2010
Tue, Nov 23, 2010, 10:06 am // John ServaisSeth Fleetwood was one vote against, saying this is an Orwellian notion.
4 comments; last on Nov 25, 2010
Mon, Nov 22, 2010, 5:00 am // Riley SweeneyRiley Sweeney makes the case for investing and supporting local campaign managers
4 comments; last on Dec 05, 2010
Sat, Nov 20, 2010, 4:13 pm // Guest writerDave Stalheim warns us the Council is poised to rob the Conservation Futures Fund.
2 comments; last on Nov 25, 2010
Fri, Nov 19, 2010, 12:32 pm // John ServaisRevenue, not safety, is the reason for red light cameras.
6 comments; last on Nov 26, 2010
Mon, Nov 15, 2010, 6:17 pm // Ham HayesThe next round of invasive security procedures is not too far away.
2 comments; last on Nov 19, 2010
Mon, Nov 15, 2010, 5:00 am // Riley SweeneyRiley Sweeney takes a look at the GOP's love of the executive branch, the Dems love of the legislative...and where that leaves us.
Tue, Nov 09, 2010, 6:04 pm // Guest writerEric explains his resignation from the Greenways Advisory Committee and lists his concerns.
1 comments; last on Nov 10, 2010
Tue, Nov 09, 2010, 3:17 pm // Ham HayesA Hidden Bellingham Gem
Mon, Nov 08, 2010, 5:53 am // Riley SweeneyRiley Sweeney returns from a drunken stupor to determine why Tuesday was so painful for the Dems
Sat, Nov 06, 2010, 11:22 am // Larry HorowitzWhy Washington Federal's best option is to accept Bellingham's offer to take Fairhaven Highlands off its hands
6 comments; last on Nov 14, 2010
Fri, Nov 05, 2010, 4:00 pm // Paul deArmondWhat went wrong in the mid-term election, why, and what we can expect now.
3 comments; last on Nov 16, 2010
Wed, Nov 03, 2010, 11:25 am // John ServaisWhatcom Democratic Party leaders have failed local liberals again. They have no concept of inclusion and live in their own dream world.
16 comments; last on Nov 25, 2010
Election InfoCandidate Filings
Coal, Oil & TrainsCommunity Wise Bellingham
Powder River Basin R. C.
Local Blogs & NewsBellingham Herald
Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
League of Women Voters
Western Front - WWU
Local CausesChuckanut Community Forest
City Club of Bellingham
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
WA Conservation Voters
Port of Bellingham
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Weather & ClimateCliff Mass Weather Blog
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate
Edge of Sports
Famous Internet Skiers
Good Web SitesAl-Jazeera online
Foreign Policy in Focus
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Middle East Times
New American Century
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Project Vote Smart
Stand for the Troops
Talking Points Memo
The Crisis Papers
War and Piece
NwCitizen 1995 - 2007Early Northwest Citizen
Quiet, Offline or DeadBellingham Police Activity
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph