The Way I See It - Mandatory CitizenshipPermalink +
Wed, Apr 28, 2010, 5:54 am // Ham Hayes
When I lived in Colorado a number of decades ago, Ridgeway was what we called a “blow-by” town. That’s as in, “I’m going to blow-by Ridgeway on my way to ski in Telluride.” Then, as now, it was a small ranching community with less than a thousand residents. Now, there are tele-techies and lifestylers living there amid a middle-aged population, but the town is still small. The region around Ridgeway is made up of river valleys nestling in some stunning mountain country; some would say idyllic.
Maybe it is not so idyllic after all. According to the Denver Post (Denverpost.com - April 26), the local pub owner has put Ridgeway on the map by proposing mandatory voting in town elections. The town has a very poor record of voter turnout, to the dismay of a number of citizens. The proposal has stirred up some emotion and some confrontations in this already occasionally contentious community. In a related article, the Post reports that 21 countries have mandatory voting laws, including Greece and Australia. “Penalties range from prohibitions on obtaining passports and driver's licenses for nonvoters in Greece, to being fined $15 in Australia.”
Is non-voting protected under the U.S. Constitution as a form of free speech? Or is it an obligatory act of citizenship like serving on a jury, paying taxes or serving in the military? The Post points to the 1896 Missouri Supreme Court ruling that the government can’t force citizens to vote. Proponents of mandatory voting might argue that the increase in voter participation is an admirable goal leading to better representation. But could it work, and is it worth it?
Mandatory voting would certainly change the political landscape in the U.S. The highly developed art of “getting out the vote” would be gone. Whipping up the emotional aspect of electioneering would take a real licking. It might even force politicians and political parties to spend more effort presenting convincing discussions and arguments for or against their platforms than is currently the case. But would it actually result in a more informed voting public, or would those who don’t vote today merely mail in their ballots with random votes or even no markings at all? I suspect the latter course, or worse, might be the case. Humans can really be passive/aggressive when they choose, and nonsense voting would be an interesting way to defeat the purpose of mandatory voting. Another possible consequence might be to make votes available for sale. If a voter doesn’t really care, they could easily make their ballots available to others -- for a price. I’m guessing people who voluntarily vote now are less likely to sell their ballots.
Mandatory voting would also add significantly to the immigration debate. If every eligible citizen were required to vote, and therefore register, there would be an almost certain check on citizenship, especially if linked to other documentation like driver's licenses, social security identification, tax records or employment records. Beyond the immigration issue, will the whole notion of mandatory voting for all eligible citizens finally force us into a national registration system? The technology is available to do so. We can track every citizen if we wish; it is merely a question of our will as a nation and as a society. Is that where we want to go?
In an open system of government, apathy and low voter turnout can’t be corrected by legislation or regulation. Those are misplaced strategies leading to the possibility of more onerous government control and intrusion, i.e. a police state. Instead, the reasons for voter apathy need to be understood and corrected. Is our electoral system overly corrupt and too strongly controlled by special interests? If so, then the voters and responsible elected officials need to respond by insisting on reform. Unfortunately, if they don’t, then guess what? Nothing will change. Or perhaps materialism has so overwhelmed our society we have forgotten the lessons about what it takes to sustain a democratic form of government. In that case, perhaps we need to look at the values we teach our children. Or perhaps we are happy with how well our government takes care of our problems. We can tell ourselves, "The Ship of State is running well, not to worry!"
The current debate about what is important to us in this country is smelly, noisy and exasperating. For all of the worst of it, that debate is still critically important to what we will become as a society and a nation. I, for one, don’t support mandatory voting or citizenship, for the reason that I believe it further enables us to not take our responsibilities to ourselves seriously. Let's be noisy and active. Let's not let our Ship flounder.
Wed, Apr 28, 2010, 5:54 am // Ham HayesMandatory voting - Worth it, or too high a price ?
3 comments; last on Jun 09, 2010
Mon, Apr 26, 2010, 5:55 am // Riley SweeneyRiley Sweeney shares his passion for board games and a few of his favorites games
4 comments; last on Apr 27, 2010
Fri, Apr 23, 2010, 4:00 am // Guest writerBo Richardson writes about "Indispensable Enemies" by Walter Karp.
6 comments; last on Apr 28, 2010
Wed, Apr 21, 2010, 5:29 pm // John ServaisBellingham Herald reporting is skewed to foster desired opinions and hide facts
4 comments; last on Apr 23, 2010
Wed, Apr 21, 2010, 11:20 am // Ham HayesOver-the-top cleric blames women for earthquakes.
Mon, Apr 19, 2010, 5:55 am // Riley SweeneyRiley Sweeney explains the difference between a political hack and a political wonk
2 comments; last on Apr 20, 2010
Fri, Apr 16, 2010, 1:11 am // Guest writerRichard Conoboy presents the reasons that our city has a need for more control of rental properties.
15 comments; last on May 02, 2010
Wed, Apr 14, 2010, 5:58 am // Ham HayesProcrastination, thy name is Self
Mon, Apr 12, 2010, 5:55 am // Riley SweeneyRiley Sweeney talks about his favorite justice and who the President should appoint
Fri, Apr 09, 2010, 4:12 pm // John ServaisAn article that questions the man-made global warming hysteria
Wed, Apr 07, 2010, 5:58 am // Ham HayesThe Tea Party reflects a major shift in citizen political participation.
7 comments; last on Apr 14, 2010
Mon, Apr 05, 2010, 6:00 pm // Riley SweeneyRiley Sweeney shares his humorous personal definitions for Whatcom County politics.
Mon, Apr 05, 2010, 5:30 pm // John ServaisGreenpeace has more empty threats for anyone who doesn't believe as they do. Guess they are going to cut off NwCitizen funding.
2 comments; last on Apr 08, 2010
Thu, Apr 01, 2010, 11:00 am // Guest writerTom Anderson submits this guest column. He brings attention to our local earthquake risks - and what we can do to prepare.
1 comments; last on Apr 01, 2010
Election InfoAuditor Election page
State Results - Nov 3
Whatcom Results - Nov 3
Coal, Oil & TrainsCoal Stop
Community Wise Bham
Powder River Basin R. C.
Local Blogs & NewsBellingham Herald
Bham Business Journal
Bham Politics & Econ
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
League of Women Voters
Western Front - WWU
Local CausesChuckanut C. Forest
City Club of Bellingham
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary
WA Conservation Voters
Whatcom Peace & Justice
Governments- Whatcom County
Port of Bellingham
State Results - Nov 3
US Supreme Court
US The White House
NWCitizen 1995-2007Early Northwest Citizen
Weather & ClimateCliff Mass Weather Blog
Nat Hurricane Center
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That?
Edge of Sports
Famous Internet Skiers
Good Web SitesAl-Jazeera online
Change The Mascot
Foreign Policy in Focus
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Middle East Times
New American Century
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Project Vote Smart
Stand for the Troops
Talking Points Memo
The Crisis Papers
War and Piece
Quiet, Offline or DeadBellingham Register
Bhm Herald Politics Blog
Citizens of Bellingham
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Intrnational Herald Tribune
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph