Transportation Economics

Permalink +

Wed, Feb 27, 2008, 1:10 pm  //  Craig Mayberry

It looks like another legislative session and another missed opportunity to deal with transportation problems in the state, especially around Seattle. Both political parties seem to ignore some of the fundamental economics at play. If you own a business and have seen a steady increase in customers until your factory no longer has capacity to build enough products, you have two choices. First, you can build another factory. Second, you can invest in efficiencies to improve the output of the current factory. Building a new factory comes with a substantial increase in capital costs and ongoing costs. Improving existing capacity also comes with a cost, but usually a fraction of the cost of building a new factory. Businesses usually jump to the second option and try to improve efficiency, before deciding to build a new factory. Why would our state government not take the same approach, instead of immediately jumping to the most expensive option?

The economics of roads are like the economics of factories. We have seen a steady increase in the use of roads to where our current roads cannot meet demand, the result being traffic gridlock. We have two choices. First, build new roads (or widen existing roads). Second, improve the efficiency of our existing roads through a better mass transit system (buses). It should be noted that light rail is the worst of both worlds due to the high construction cost and lower ridership. Buses move far more people in the same space as a few cars, and have the same flexibility of the current road system. A good bus system is the equivalent of an improvement in efficiency in a factory. Either option is going to cost money. New riders will not pay for the entire cost of an improved bus system, but then again neither will drivers pay for a new road. Just like the factory example above, we have a choice of building new roads at a few billion dollars per project, or we can spend a few hundred million dollars improving the bus system, and not build as many new roads. The cost of building new roads is now astronomical and cannot be done within current state economics, which is why each legislative session we come out with no real answers.

Many will claim that we are not willing to subsidize bus transportation, yet the fundamental question is whether we would rather spend $5 billion a year of our taxes on new roads, or $700 million a year of our taxes on a better bus system that improves convenience and reduces the number of cars on the road. If the bus systems were structured such that 10-20% of commuters could realistically use the bus, then that would free up that much space on our existing roads. Either way, the taxpayers will be on the hook for the bill, but it would be better to be on the hook for a few hundred million than a few billion. Bus ridership is based on availability and convenience, neither of which we have obtained to high enough levels that buses are a viable transportation alternative. I have heard many say that buses are not viable until gas is over $4.00 a gallon, but it is not that simple. Bus ridership is based on convenience, the more convenient the more likely someone is willing to ride even with cheaper gas prices. With our current inconvenient bus system, then even at $4.00 a gallon for gas it is unlikely to make a dent in bus ridership. There is no doubt that there is tremendous pressure on our state government to focus on road construction, versus cheaper alternatives, but economics will ultimately prevail.

Coming soon… A Tale of Two Cities

Tip Johnson  //  Wed, Feb 27, 2008, 2:30 pm

It seems necessary to continue repeating this:

There are more registered vehicles than people in our metropolitan areas.  Each vehicle is estimated to cost between $4,000 and $7,000 per year to keep running.  Therefore, we can multiply our population times a conservative $5,000 per year to estimate our direct out-of-pocket expense for private transportation.  So a population of 100,000 is spending at least $500,000,000 a year to drive around in congested traffic in the riskiest transportation system ever devised.  That’s irrational.

Besides smoking, there is nothing we choose to do that is more dangerous than driving cars.  The $500 million does not include our tax contribution toward roads, traffic enforcement and the cost of adjudicating infractions. It does not include the cost of deaths and injuries, or the ecological and health consequences.  It does not account for the alternative cost of committing between 20 and 50 percent of our urban land areas to automobiles.  Overall, it is estimated that we spend almost a third of our personal income on personal transportation.

As far as factories go, no good business would ever invest in a factory with the express intent of letting it sit idle 90% of the time.  Yet that is exactly what we do with our cars - the single biggest investment most Americans will make in their lifetimes.

There are compelling reasons to find alternatives.  First, we already know we can’t fix the problem by building more roads.  If 30% of our dough isn’t doing it, just how much do individuals want to contribute? Plus, our population is growing older.  Very soon a vast majority of us will be ill-equipped to compete with aggressive young drivers on over congested roads - and no one will want them to try!  Are older Americans destined to live shut-in lives, exiled from the economy?  We probably don’t want that, either.  Then there is the environmental aspect. Do we really want salmon in our streams?  What about the consequences of global warming?  And there is an important economic piece.  If we could do the job for 10 or 15 percent of our personal income, we’d have a lot more cash in our local economy that could create jobs and sustain our families.

Are there alternatives?  Light rail does make sense in some circumstances.  Getting around n New York, Singapore, Paris, or many European urban centers is fast, easy and affordable precisely because they chose to invest in fixed guideways before committing to roadway capacity.  Buses are also proven effective, but one hour waits are known to discourage ridership.  Any system requires adequate investment, but our singular comittment to the present system limits our resources for funding alternatives.

There are plenty of other alternatives. Personal Rapid Transit is a light guideway system that has been a theoretically superior people moving option for over twenty years. But it hasn’t been able to break through the many barriers to change.

For that matter, about $20 million a year would pay 200 people $50,000 a year and finance their vans and insurance to drive around Whatcom County, continuously picking folks up and dropping them off wherever and whenever they wanted to go.

Rising fuel prices and diminishing supplies, the cost of reinvesting in alternate fuels and compatible vehicles, the astronomical expense of providing adequate roadway capacity all point to the need for some serious revisions to our transportation infrastructure before the present system grinds to a halt.

It’s a matter of political will, and that has to start with our personal choices.  As long as we choose to do nothing, the outcome is destined to be more of the same.


Transportation Economics

Wed, Feb 27, 2008, 1:10 pm  //  Craig Mayberry

It looks like another legislative session and another missed opportunity to deal with transportation problems in the state, especially around Seattle. Both political parties seem to ignore some…

1 comments; last on Feb 27, 2008

First thoughts on library bond issue end

Tue, Feb 26, 2008, 3:35 pm  //  John Servais

Yesterday the city council tabled the library bond issue. In its present form, it is probably permanently gone. The project was a concoction from former mayor Mark and…

0 comments

Paper Dreams in Fairhaven

Next door to Village Books

When Negativity Might Just Pull You Through

Sat, Feb 23, 2008, 12:45 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

Unlike graffiti, it's easy to avoid the unclaimed posts on what serves as the Herald's exchange of political thought, and even more anonymous sites passing themselves off as…

2 comments; last on Feb 25, 2008

What you can’t see, won’t kill ya - a lesson in TBL

Fri, Feb 22, 2008, 12:24 pm  //  Ham Hayes

TBL, or Triple Bottom Line, is a nifty concept that says we want to be evaluating and measuring projects on the basis not only of economic, but environmental…

5 comments; last on Feb 24, 2008

The Impact of Taxes on Planning

Fri, Feb 22, 2008, 12:43 am  //  Craig Mayberry

In the ongoing discussion over land use, no one has brought up what potential impact the financing of city and county government has in the land use decision…

2 comments; last on Feb 27, 2008

Let’s Drink to Pete and Jay!

Thu, Feb 21, 2008, 12:18 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

With all due reverence for Messrs Jefferson and Reagan, a government that governs less is not always a government that governs best. Consider Ecology's performance the last twenty…

2 comments; last on Feb 21, 2008

Gas(p) Gulping to Oregon

Tue, Feb 19, 2008, 11:39 pm  //  Ham Hayes

What are we thinking? Or do we think at all? I drove to Portland this weekend to visit my daughter. Now I admit to being one of those…

1 comments; last on Feb 20, 2008

To vest or not to vest: Chuckanut Ridge & the CAO

Fri, Feb 15, 2008, 9:13 pm  //  Larry Horowitz

After an extended hiatus, the battle over Chuckanut Ridge has begun to heat up again. In one corner: landowners Horizon Bank and David Edelstein. In the other corner:…

2 comments; last on Feb 19, 2008

The Predatory Universe of Non-Profits in Happy Valley

Mon, Feb 11, 2008, 11:47 am  //  Tip Johnson

Something about Bellingham’s poverty brings out the worst, even in the best of us.

The Kulshan Land Trust ushered it’s presence into Happy Valley with the development

1 comments; last on Feb 12, 2011

Where There’s Smoke and No One’s Fired

Sun, Feb 10, 2008, 6:10 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

Karen Frakes is legal advisor to the Whatcom County Council,.though I will leave it to you to decide who she really represents. She's a deputy in Dave McEachran's…

1 comments; last on Feb 10, 2008

Congrats to Obama and “Other”

Sun, Feb 10, 2008, 1:15 am  //  Craig Mayberry

I have to laugh, although in no way does it mean I am laughing at the state and county Republican Party, who I do respect and support. At…

5 comments; last on Feb 18, 2008

Turning Straw Into Gold

Fri, Feb 08, 2008, 4:06 pm  //  g.h.kirsch

Allowing residential development on farmlands is turning straw into gold. Like most land use decisions, it is distributing wealth. So it is very much of interest who is…

0 comments

Kudos: The Big Kahuna’s Big Cojones

Thu, Feb 07, 2008, 2:03 pm  //  Tip Johnson

Today's Herald features a local story entitled, "Mayor taking tougher stance with Port on waterfront". It's high time someone started considering the City's interests in this fiasco!
1 comments; last on Feb 08, 2008

Stimulating the Economy

Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 6:53 pm  //  Tip Johnson

I'm amazed at the response our Administration and Congress have taken toward news that the economy might be in trouble. Their idea is to write a bunch of…

1 comments; last on Feb 07, 2008

City Council Flip Flop on Public Comment - UPDATE

Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 12:12 pm  //  Ham Hayes

Isn’t it fair to ask the city council to establish and consistently follow a procedure for when public comment will be allowed? Is it good open government to…

0 comments

Correction Direction

Tue, Feb 05, 2008, 11:49 am  //  Tip Johnson

I took a little heat from one of our new councilmembers, who took issue with yesterday's piece, "Continuing Parlor Tricks". Therein, I used a bad choice of words,…

0 comments

Continuing Parlor Tricks

Mon, Feb 04, 2008, 1:15 pm  //  Tip Johnson

The Herald's utility as an organ for community information is sometimes sorely tested - especially when things get controversial or confusing. Of course, it's not that they don't…

0 comments

Central Library - Are We Ready to Decide?

Mon, Feb 04, 2008, 10:49 am  //  Ham Hayes

Almost everyone of us has been significantly touched by the revolution of digitized information and the internet. And if you want to see what's happening to electronic libraries,…

6 comments; last on Feb 06, 2008

When Is Less More?

Sat, Feb 02, 2008, 3:55 pm  //  Tip Johnson

When Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) are prepared, more than one development model might be evaluated. But a no-action alternative is always required as a baseline reference. Convention

0 comments

Public Campaign Financing

Fri, Feb 01, 2008, 7:49 pm  //  Craig Mayberry

A couple of days ago Sam Taylor had an article in the Bellingham Herald and subsequent blog on the subject of public campaign finance. The state house voted…

0 comments

A Question for our County Auditor

Fri, Feb 01, 2008, 11:09 am  //  John Servais

Yesterday we all received our ballots for the presidential primary election. We are expected to fill them out and mail them in by February 19. The instructions are…

0 comments

 

New Links

Julia Ioffe/New Republic
the Oatmeal

Current Interest

Community Wise Bellingham
counterpunch
Friends of Whatcom
Guardian Unlimited
Lummi Island Quarry
Reconveyance Challenge
Whatcom Elections

Publisher Recommended

counterpunch
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
League of Women Voters
Paul Krugman - economics
Sweeney Politics

Local Blogs & News

Bellingham Herald
Bham Herald Politics Blog
Bham Politics & Economics
Bob Sanders
Cascadia Weekly
Citizen Ted
Ferndale Record
Friends of Whatcom
Get Whatcom Planning
HamsterTalk
Jack Petree
KGMI
Latte Republic
League of Women Voters
Lynden Tribune
MikeatthePort
Northern Light
Sweeney Politics
Twilight Zoning
Wally Wonders
Western Front - WWU
Whatcom Watch

Local Causes

Bellingham Police Activity
Chuckanut Community Forest
Chuckanut Mountains
Citizens of Bellingham
City Club of Bellingham
Community Wise Bellingham
Conservation NW
Cordata & Meridian
Facebook Port Reform
Futurewise - Whatcom
Lake Whatcom
Lummi Island Quarry
N. Cascades Audubon
NW Holocaust Center
RE Sources
Reconveyance Challenge
Reduce Jet Noise
Salish Sea Org.
Save the Granary Building
Transition Whatcom
WA Conservation Voters

Governments

Bellingham
Port of Bellingham
Skagit County
US - The White House
WA State Access
WA State Elections
WA State Legislature
Whatcom Auditor
Whatcom County
Whatcom Elections

Weather & Climate

Cliff Mass Weather Blog
Climate Audit
NW Radar
Two day forecast
Watts Up With That? - climate

Leisure

Adventures NW
Edge of Sports
Entertainment NNW
Famous Internet Skiers
Sailing Anarchy

Good Links

Al-Jazeera online
Alaska Dispatch
AlterNet.org
Antiwar.com
Arab News
Asia Times
Atlantic, The
Common Dreams
counterpunch
Crosscut Seattle
Daily Kos
Daily Mirror
Doonesbury
Drudge Report
FiveThirtyEight
Foreign Policy in Focus
GlobalPost
Guardian Unlimited
Gulf News
Haaretz
Huffington Post
Innocence Project, The
Intrnational Herald Tribune
James Fallows
Jerusalem Post
Joel Connelly
Juan Cole
Julia Ioffe/New Republic
Le Diplo
Media Matters
Michael Moore
Middle East Times
MoveOn.org
Nation, The
New American Century
News Trust
NMFA
numbers
Online Journal
Palestine Daily
Palestine News
Paul Krugman - economics
Personal bio info
Portland Indy Media
Progressive Review
Project Vote Smart
Reuters
Sea Shepherd
Slate
Talking Points Memo
the Oatmeal
Tom Paine.com
truthout
War and Piece
Washington Votes
WikiLeaks.ch
ynetnews.com

NwCitizen 1995 - 2007

Early Northwest Citizen

Internet At Its Best

TED

Quiet, Offline or Dead

Bellingham Register
Carl Weimer
David Hackworth
N. Sound Conservancy
No Leaky Buckets
Northwest Review
Orcinus
Post-Oklahoman Confessions
Protect Bellingham Parks
The American Telegraph
The Crisis Papers